Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump asks the Supreme Court to block sentencing in his hush money case in New York
The New York Post ^ | 01/08/2025 | Ben Kochman

Posted on 01/08/2025 8:55:13 AM PST by thegagline

President-elect Donald Trump urged the US Supreme Court Wednesday to take the extraordinary step of halting his sentencing later this week in his Manhattan “hush money” case.

Trump’s lawyers urged the nation’s highest court to step in after a New York appeals court refused to postpone the Friday hearing, at which he is set to face a no-punishment sentence.

The attorneys argued that going ahead with the sentencing would unconstitutionally interfere with Trump preparing for his second term. This Court should enter an immediate stay of further proceedings in the New York trial court to prevent grave injustice and harm to the institution of the Presidency and the operations of the federal government,” attorneys Todd Blanche, Emil Bove and D. John Sauer wrote.

***

Trump’s lawyers also simultaneously asked New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals in Albany, to stay the sentencing, according to the US Supreme Court filing. The judge overseeing the hush money case, Juan Merchan, last week set sentencing for Jan. 10 — just 10 days before Trump’s second inauguration as president.

The judge said that he planned to give Trump the most lenient possible sentence — no jail time, fine or probation. He also will let Trump appear virtually for the 9:30 a.m. hearing in Manhattan Supreme Court.

Trump, 78, can’t appeal to overturn the conviction until the sentencing is complete. A Manhattan jury in May found the real estate mogul-turned-politician guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records for lying on company files to conceal a 2016 payoff by his former fixer, Michael Cohen, to adult film actress Stormy Daniels. The payoff was meant to stop Daniels from telling her story about having sex with a married Trump in a Lake Tahoe hotel suite years earlier, according to trial testimony. ***

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: attainder; expostfacto; fakefreepers; federalism; jurisdiction; lawfare; merchan; nda; nevertrumpingtroll; notfoolinganyone; nothushmoney; notillegal; tds; thefagline; trump; whyishestillhere; zotthistroll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Here is the Application for a Stay

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24A666/336760/20250107212856360_2025-01-07%20-%20Trump%20v.%20New%20York%20-%20Supreme%20Court%20Stay%20Application.pdf

1 posted on 01/08/2025 8:55:13 AM PST by thegagline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thegagline

John Roberts will NOT allow this!! He DESPISES TRUMP!


2 posted on 01/08/2025 8:56:03 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline
In the Supreme Court of the United States
3 posted on 01/08/2025 8:58:12 AM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

What a farce that we actually have to entertain this Ghana banana republic-level nonsense. I hope they all get their covid boosters and the clots/immune disorders that go with them.


4 posted on 01/08/2025 8:58:37 AM PST by Strict9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

Yep, Roberts will use the usual leap frogging excuse to dodge this.


5 posted on 01/08/2025 9:00:08 AM PST by iamgalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

If he does, it will contradict his immunity ruling.


6 posted on 01/08/2025 9:00:37 AM PST by vivenne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vivenne

I should say, if Robert’s doesn’t allow the stay.


7 posted on 01/08/2025 9:01:26 AM PST by vivenne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

What was in the bag John?


8 posted on 01/08/2025 9:02:32 AM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

Why doesn’t he argue there was no standing and its not a legitimate charge? Bragg didn’t have standing to prosecute a federal charge.


9 posted on 01/08/2025 9:07:32 AM PST by TiGuy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TiGuy22

How do you know he isn’t?

I’m sure Trump’s attorneys are including that in their argument.


10 posted on 01/08/2025 9:11:32 AM PST by laplata (They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possiWe neve hear of gambling paying off $billioble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: iamgalt

Roberts: “It’s a tax”


11 posted on 01/08/2025 9:12:41 AM PST by WeaslesRippedMyFlesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

He hasn’t been getting much help from the Supremes.


12 posted on 01/08/2025 9:15:45 AM PST by bigbob (Yes. We ARE going back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TiGuy22

The “no standing” argument is absolutely relevant, but only in the normal appeal process — which wouldn’t begin until after sentencing. That is not sufficient grounds to get an immediate stay in the sentencing. To stop the sentencing, the defendant in the case has to demonstrate that there’s an urgent, compelling reason to circumvent the normal process.


13 posted on 01/08/2025 9:30:42 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Well, maybe I'm a little rough around the edges; inside a little hollow.” -- Tom Petty, “Rebels”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

Why must you make things up.


14 posted on 01/08/2025 9:37:38 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

This whole thing is a wash. The intent of going after Trump for all these things was to keep him out of the white house. It didn’t work. And after this trip, he won’t be going again unless his wife wins. So it will make no difference as if they want to slap the republican party they have their share of politicians in jail along with fines. So liberals should make the deal and try to save face. If the jail him, Vance will have him out in about 10 minutes.

A site to display the liberals illegal acts is this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_American_federal_politicians_convicted_of_crimes

wy69


15 posted on 01/08/2025 9:55:19 AM PST by whitney69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

Unlikely that the Supremes will take this.

He will just have to take the scenic route through the appeals process.


16 posted on 01/08/2025 10:05:53 AM PST by lurk (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

You’re a GAS!!! LOL!! You REALLY think Roberts doesn’t HATE TRUMP? I thought you were smarter than that.


17 posted on 01/08/2025 10:14:38 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

Why would you even think Roberts hates Trump??


18 posted on 01/08/2025 10:20:06 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

So John Roberts as Chief Justice can block ANYTHING all by himself? That’s how it works? I thought it was 9 of them in the process of what happens in a case but you say Roberts acting alone means the rest don’t matter?


19 posted on 01/08/2025 10:25:03 AM PST by txrangerette (Make America Great Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

American patriots can’t win in “American Feral Government “Courts”.


20 posted on 01/08/2025 11:04:13 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Deport that piggie, Marchan!!! NOW!!! Send his butt back to Colombia! He's milked America enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson