Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $25,807
31%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 31%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: bushvgore

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Why didn't the CIA talk to the FBI to prevent 9/11? [Dated] [Clinton Administration "Chinese Wall"]

    09/11/2021 6:41:18 AM PDT · by SES1066 · 32 replies
    Quora ^ | 09/11/2020 | Brian Good
    Later the CIA did inform the FBI about these two al Qaeda agents. There was debate in the FBI about whether a full-scale criminal investigation should be undertaken, or just a background intelligence investigation. The latter was chosen. A rookie was assigned to the case. Within days he was on their trail, and he wanted to run a credit card check. A FBI superior said it was a bad idea. According to Bob Woodward, the credit card check would have revealed that these two known al Qaeda agents had bought ten airline tickets dated 9/11/01 under their own real names.
  • Trump Attorney Jenna Ellis on Wisconsin Supreme Court Case: Bush v. Gore Is Precedent Here – President Trump Gets Same Opportunity as Bush to Argue His Case (VIDEO)

    12/29/2020 8:15:26 PM PST · by bitt · 13 replies
    GATEWAY PUNDIT ^ | 12/29/2020 | Jim Hoft
    President Trump’s Senior Legal Advisor Jenna Ellis joined Grant Stinchfield Tuesday night on Newsmax. Jenna was asked about the latest legal moves to bring justice to the Trump campaign in the stolen 2020 election. Ellis told Stinchfield that the Trump legal team is going to continue to fight because they care about election integrity and they’re going to push these cases through every legal and viable avenue. Jenna then added that President Trump’s Wisconsin case is very similar to George Bush’s 2000 case in Florida. Jenna Ellis: If this election and all of the fraud is not corrected by January...
  • An Illegitimate Election Plunges the Republic into a Crisis

    11/27/2020 9:32:18 AM PST · by Mount Athos · 66 replies
    Frontpage Mag ^ | Nov 27, 2020 | Daniel Greenfield
    However the presidential election turns out, one thing is clear, half the country will believe that the man officially sitting in the White House is an illegitimate pretender. And that’s the way it’s been throughout this century. The crisis of presidential legitimacy really kicked into gear in 2000. Before that people might hate the president, but the opposing political party wouldn’t insist on his illegitimacy. Afterward every president has been treated as an illegitimate criminal to be opposed and driven out. Twenty years later, the Democrat strategy of presidential illegitimacy has brought the country to the brink of civil war....
  • Bush to begin transition, urges Gore not to contest Florida (old article - look what a difference 20 years makes)

    11/27/2020 4:13:36 PM PST · by DoodleBob · 18 replies
    CNN ^ | November 27, 2000 | N/A
    AUSTIN, Texas (CNN) -- Texas Gov. George W. Bush said he will go ahead with forming an administration after Florida officials certified his 537-vote lead in that state's presidential recount Sunday, but Vice President Al Gore prepared to challenge those results in a formal contest. Bush named his running mate, former Defense Secretary Dick Cheney, to lead his transition team, and former Transportation Secretary Andrew Card to serve as chief of staff. "This has been a hard-fought election, a healthy contest for American democracy," Bush said. "But now that the votes are counted, it is time for the votes to...
  • Gore: "No Intermediate Step Between A Final Supreme Court Decision And A Violent Revolution"

    05/01/2013 5:57:20 AM PDT · by Biggirl · 50 replies
    Real Clear Politics Video ^ | May 1,2013 | Real Clear Politics Video
    In an interview with Bloomberg TV from the Milken Global Conference in Beverly Hills, former Vice President Al Gore claims American democracy has been "hacked." Gore also opined on former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor recently commenting that she regretted her decision in Bush v. Gore.
  • News Media Keep Peddling Their Bush Vs. Gore Lie

    05/01/2013 5:03:49 AM PDT · by IBD editorial writer · 25 replies
    Investor's Business Daily ^ | 04/30/2013 | IBD Staff
    Media Bias: When Sandra Day O'Connor said she regretted her decision in Bush v. Gore, the press threw another fit about the "stolen" election. They seem to forget their own studies proved the court's ruling didn't matter. [snip] After that election, USA Today, the New York Times and every other major news organization spent months manually recounting Florida ballots in hopes of proving that the court did, in fact, hand victory to Bush. And what did these recounts find?
  • Goodwin Liu had a hand in Bush v. Gore

    08/31/2011 3:09:57 PM PDT · by SmithL · 14 replies
    SFGate: Politics Blog ^ | 8/31/11 | Bob Egelko, Chronicle Staff Writer
    Senate Republicans were irate at Goodwin Liu's opposition to President George W. Bush's Supreme Court candidates. Imagine their indignation if they'd known that Liu had a hand in a Supreme Court opinion that, if it had prevailed, might have kept Bush out of the White House. The information comes from Herma Hill Kay, a law school colleague of Liu's at UC Berkeley. She wrote to the state Commission on Judicial Appointments in support of Gov. Jerry Brown's nomination of Liu to the California Supreme Court, after President Obama's choice of the 40-year-old academic for a federal appeals court seat in...
  • Bush vs Gore 10 years later

    12/22/2010 3:02:31 PM PST · by big black dog · 10 replies · 1+ views
    Ten years ago, Al Gore tried to steal the presidency of George W. Bush. That is how the story should be written for all of history, but the left will try to spin it otherwise. Rehashing every single moment in the 36 day 2000 Election drama would be more boring than an Al Gore speech. A decade later, some things that were true in 2000 remain true in 2010. Richard Nixon could have sued to challenge the election of John Kennedy in 1960. There was real election fraud, with dead people in Chicago and other dirty tricks in LBJ’s home...
  • Rx for national vote-count chaos

    06/29/2010 2:34:23 AM PDT · by Scanian · 18 replies
    NY Post ^ | June 29, 2010 | MICHAEL M. UHLMANN
    The state Senate may be clueless about how to fix New York's fiscal mess, but it's absolutely confident that it knows how to reform the nation's electoral system. It just endorsed the so-called National Popular Vote plan, which would radically alter the nation's presidential election system without bothering to amend the Constitution. The Assembly and the governor should kill this scheme. The idea is to prevent a repeat of the 2000 election, when Al Gore won the popular vote but George W. Bush won the electoral vote and the presidency. Sounds reasonable -- but this "solution" would only bring greater...
  • Bush vs. Gore Attorneys Team up to Fight Prop 8 in Federal Court

    05/26/2009 6:12:50 PM PDT · by Maelstorm · 58 replies · 2,714+ views
    http://laist.com ^ | May 26, 2009 | By Zach Behrens
    Two top attorneys who argued Bush v. Gore on opposite sides have now joined forces to strike down Prop 8 in federal court, filing for a preliminary injunction against same-sex marriage ban until the case is resolved, which would immediately reinstate the right for all Californians to marry. Theodore B. Olson and David will officially announce their case tomorrow morning in downtown, according to the American Foundation for Equal Rights. Olson, a former U.S. Solicitor General represented President Bush, against Al Gore, who was represented by Boies. The pair is representing two gay men and two gay women who were...
  • Lesley Stahl vs. Antonin Scalia In the Court of Public Opinion

    04/28/2008 11:06:57 AM PDT · by Congressman Billybob · 28 replies · 440+ views
    Special to FreeRepublic ^ | 28 April 2008 | John Armor (Congressman Billybob)
    Sunday night on “60 Minutes,” Lesley Stahl interviewed Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. Half of the interview was excellent, reviewing his history from his childhood in New York City. The other half of the interview, on his judicial philosophy, was dreadful. Several times, Stahl attacked Scalia for his judicial theory of “originalism,” while leaving parts of his comments on the cutting room floor. She displayed a lack of knowledge about the Constitution. She referred to Scalia’s theory as fixing the meaning of the Constitution as the intentions of “people who ratified it over 200 years ago.” That echoed the comments...
  • Partisan Fissures Over Voter ID: [U.S. Supreme Court] Justices to Hear Challenge to Law

    12/25/2007 11:47:24 AM PST · by Aristotelian · 30 replies · 173+ views
    The Washington Post ^ | December 25, 2007 | Justices to Hear Challenge to Law
    The Supreme Court will open the new year with its most politically divisive case since Bush v. Gore decided the 2000 presidential election, and its decision could force a major reinterpretation of the rules of the 2008 contest. The case presents what seems to be a straightforward and even unremarkable question: Does a state requirement that voters show a specific kind of photo identification before casting a ballot violate the Constitution? The answer so far has depended greatly on whether you are a Democratic or Republican politician -- or even, some believe, judge. "It is exceedingly difficult to maneuver in...
  • Bush's recount lawyer blasts White House administration

    11/09/2007 10:48:54 AM PST · by SubGeniusX · 33 replies · 73+ views
    National Law Journal ^ | 11/08/07 | Julie Kay
    Barry Richard, the Greenberg Traurig lawyer who achieved fame for his successful representation of George Bush in the Bush v. Gore recount suits, is set to give a speech blasting the Bush administration Saturday night. Richard will be the keynote speaker at the National Association of Former U.S. Attorneys' (NAFUSA) annual conference starting Thursday and running through Saturday at the Ritz Carlton Hotel in Miami Beach, Fla. More than 100 former U.S. attorneys are expected to attend the conference, which will also feature a panel discussion on the controversial U.S. attorney firings by former Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez. That panel...
  • In 2008, Bush v. Gore Redux (Democrats Shudder In The Face Of Almost Certain Defeat)

    09/22/2007 2:05:37 PM PDT · by shrinkermd · 87 replies · 884+ views
    New York Times ^ | 22 September 2007 | Bob Herbert
    ...It’s panic time in Republican circles. The G.O.P. could go into next year’s election burdened by the twin demons of an unpopular war and an economic downturn. The party that took the White House in 2000 while losing the popular vote figures it may have to do it again. The Presidential Election Reform Act is the name of a devious proposal that Republican operatives have dreamed up to siphon off 20 or more of the 55 electoral votes that the Democrats would get if, as expected, they win California in 2008. That’s a lot of electoral votes, the equivalent of...
  • Book Says Souter Mulled Resignation After Bush v. Gore

    09/04/2007 6:48:15 AM PDT · by Roberts · 95 replies · 3,614+ views
    Examiner.com ^ | 9/4/07 | Jeff Dufour and Patrick Gavin
    According to Jeffrey Toobin’s new book on the Supreme Court, Justice David Souter nearly resigned in the wake of Bush v. Gore, so distraught was he over the decision that effectively ended the Florida recount and installed George W. Bush as president. In “The Nine,” which goes on sale Sept. 18, Toobin writes that while the other justices tried to put the case behind them, “David Souter alone was shattered,” at times weeping when he thought of the case. “For many months, it was not at all clear whether he would remain as a justice,” Toobin continues. “That the Court...
  • Justices defend Florida recount decision ('had no choice but to intervene' in the Florida fiasco)

    01/24/2007 11:26:25 PM PST · by NormsRevenge · 116 replies · 2,496+ views
    AP on Yahoo ^ | 1/24/07 | Mark Sherman - ap
    WASHINGTON - Three of the five Supreme Court justices who handed the presidency to George W. Bush in 2000 say they had no choice but to intervene in the Florida recount. Comments from Justice Anthony Kennedy and retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor are in a new book that was published this week. Justice Antonin Scalia made his remarks Tuesday at Iona College in New York. Scalia, answering questions after a speech, also said that critics of the 5-4 ruling in Bush v. Gore need to move on six years after the electoral drama of December 2000, when it seemed the...
  • Here's a query for Judge Alito [ Bush v. Gore, the ultimate test]

    01/09/2006 7:35:09 PM PST · by SJackson · 16 replies · 655+ views
    When the Senate Judiciary Committee begins questioning Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito this week, Americans will again be reminded of the limitations of the confirmation process for presidential picks to serve on the federal bench. Alito will lie to the committee, intentionally and repeatedly. In keeping with the standard set by all recent high court nominees, he will treat the process and, by extension, the American people who this process is intended to serve with utter and complete disrespect. Alito will be asked direct questions and he will claim that he cannot answer them for two reasons. AP Photo/Manuel Balce...
  • The Nation: Senators Sould Press Alito on Bush v. Gore (Kookfest)

    01/09/2006 4:18:38 PM PST · by new yorker 77 · 39 replies · 677+ views
    The Nation via Yahoo! News ^ | January 9, 2006 | John Nichols
    The Nation -- When the Senate Judiciary Committee begins questioning Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito this week, Americans will again be reminded of the limitations of the confirmation process for presidential picks to serve on the federal bench. Alito will lie to the committee, intentionally and repeatedly. In keeping with the standard set by all recent high court nominees, he will treat the hearings, and by extension the American people, who the confirmation process is intended to serve, with utter and complete contempt. Alito will be asked direct questions and he will claim that he cannot answer them for two...
  • My Friend, Gene McCarthy, 1916-2005

    12/11/2005 6:32:38 PM PST · by Congressman Billybob · 60 replies · 2,527+ views
    Special to FreeRepublic ^ | 11 December, 2005 | John Armor (Congressman Billybob)
    The reporting on the life and death of my friend, Gene McCarthy, has been woefully inadequate to the truth of the man, especially in his last three decades. Gene was an intelligent and honest man, who had the courage of his convictions. That included the courage to change his convictions when the facts required. The news media brought on a number of classic tax-and-spend liberals like Eleanor Clift to talk about Gene as if he was one of them. Of course, he was that, as a professor first elected as a Senator. But in his final maturity he was much...
  • Supreme Hype - Let's separate some of the developing mainstream mythologies.

    07/05/2005 12:29:06 PM PDT · by OESY · 10 replies · 857+ views
    American Thinker ^ | July 5, 2005 | Richard Baehr
    The media is abuzz and hoping for a great battle. While most Americans are not particularly excited about the choice of a new Associate Justice for the Supreme Court, activists from the left and right, and those who report or comment on politics, are fired up. So it is a worthwhile exercise to separate some of the developing mainstream mythology about the current and future state of the Court from the reality. 1. Sandra Day O’Connor has not been the key swing justice. The liberal activists, Democratic senators and their media acolytes have been making the case that O’Connor has...