Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $22,916
28%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 28%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: bushguard

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Surprise: GOP challenger outraises Maurice Hinchey in NY-22 race

    04/21/2010 6:51:59 PM PDT · by raptor22 · 20 replies · 1,003+ views
    HotAir.com ^ | April 21, 2010 | Ed Morrissey
    Not that Ithaca Journal readers would know it from the reporting. They sniff at the notion that the GOP might make a concerted effort to push Maurice Hinchey out of Congress, then neglect to point out the rather troubling development for an incumbent of having a challenger surpass him in fundraising in an election year: Democratic Rep. Maurice Hinchey, meanwhile, is not a major GOP target in the 22nd Congressional District covering Ithaca and Binghamton and stretching east to Poughkeepsie on the other side of the Hudson River. Yes, yes, nothing to see here, just move along. Or — perhaps...
  • Bush's Guard Service

    08/28/2009 5:23:46 PM PDT · by Kaslin · 31 replies · 3,129+ views
    IBD Editorials ^ | August 28, 2009 | INVESTORS BUSINESS DAILY Staff
    Media Bias: Veteran reporter, author and commentator Bernard Goldberg reports that when CBS News did its fake National Guard story on George W. Bush avoiding service in Vietnam, it knew it was a lie.It's a liberal urban legend that Bush used the influence of his father and his father's friends to land a cushy position in the Texas National Guard to avoid service in Vietnam. The Democrats would run John Kerry as a hero in the war, and CBS News was all too eager to help with Mary Mapes producing a "60 Minutes II" segment in September 2004 charging exactly...
  • Rather Reminder: Texas Air National Guard Right about President Bush-(FACTS, from USAF COLONEL!)

    03/08/2005 8:59:09 PM PST · by freeholland · 13 replies · 1,557+ views
    CHRONWATCH.COM ^ | MARCH 9, 2005 | COL. JOHN H. WAMBOUGH, USAF (Ret)
    Dan Rather and Mary Mapes are still embracing the veracity of content of their 60 Minutes fraudulent memos aired on September 8, 2004. They need to re-read the Report of the Independent Review Panel “Concerning President Bush’s Air National Guard Service” by Dick Thornburgh and Louis D. Boccardi. For a fair perspective of President Bush’s Air National Guard (ANG) Service, I suggest reading “Bush and I were lieutenants““ by Col. William Campenni (retired), and my article: Bush and Uncommon Valor,as well as “Bush’s Air National Guard Years“ by Byron York. For a better understanding of the Dan Rather scandal, I...
  • Bill Burkett Fights Back: A key player in the Dan Rather Memogate saga sends.........

    02/22/2005 3:36:35 PM PST · by Hillary's Lovely Legs · 25 replies · 1,568+ views
    Salon ^ | 2-22-2005 | Eric Boehlert
    <p>If CBS CEO Leslie Moonves had hoped the investigation by an independent panel into the network's botched "60 Minutes Wednesday" feature regarding President Bush's National Guard duty would be enough to put the controversy behind the media giant, recent days have brought him unsettling developments. Five weeks after the panel issued its 224-page report; those it singled out for wrongdoing are fighting back -- taking issue with the investigation as well as the Viacom-owned network. The new rumblings suggest that the sour taste of CBS's National Guard story may linger for months to come. And it will almost certainly remain beyond the network's planned farewell next month for longtime anchor Dan Rather, who was the on-camera reporter for the story.</p>
  • Man who swore Bush into Air Guard speaks out

    09/24/2004 11:09:19 AM PDT · by blogblogginaway · 117 replies · 5,694+ views
    The Daily Times ^ | Sep 24, 2004 | Lance Coleman
    Ed Morrisey Jr. has his opinion about rumors President Bush received preferential treatment when he was allowed into the Texas Air National Guard in the late 1960s. The Blount Countian also has firsthand knowledge. The 75-year-old Jackson Hills resident is a retired colonel with Texas Air National Guard. He swore Lt. George W. Bush into the service in May 1968. On Thursday, Morrisey said the argument that Bush got off easy by being in the National Guard doesn't take into consideration the context of the 1960s. ``Bush and the others were flying several flights day or night over the Gulf...
  • Democrats Still Say Bush Dishonored Guard

    09/13/2004 6:39:21 PM PDT · by gortklattu · 44 replies · 797+ views
    Democratic National Committee Website ^ | Sept 13, 2004 | Democratic National Committee
    McPeak and Turner: Bush Dishonored the National Guard Then, Dishonoring Guard Now General and Admiral Offer Pre-Buttal to Bush’s National Guard Speech Washington, D.C. - After a week of new revelations regarding George W. Bush’s military service in the National Guard and just one day before Bush will address the National Guard Association in Las Vegas, General Tony McPeak and Admiral Stansfield Turner called on the President to answer questions about his time in the National Guard and also to own up to his failed record for the National Guard as President. Statements from McPeak and Turner below:
  • Evidence Against Rather (cont'd): FR Forgery Talking Points

    09/11/2004 5:33:30 PM PDT · by dickmc · 130 replies · 8,145+ views
    About 1500 or more posts on this site. :-) | dickmc and skypilot
    As you may know a thread was started yesterday morning to attempt to summarize the important forgery points. This original thread is at Evidence Against RatherThis was initiated by SkyPilot and I agreed to help out. This is a continuation of that thread. The information below needs your review, analysis, and suggested changes in the form of final edits. If you see things that should be changed, please retype the suggested revision including the line number in a new reply. While we have tried to capture the hundreds of comments and posts in the last few days, the likelihood is...
  • The Evidence Against Rather

    09/10/2004 7:18:39 PM PDT · by SkyPilot · 208 replies · 6,903+ views
    free republic ^ | 11 Sep 04 | self
    Mods and Jim, I hope you will forgive me, but no one seems to have posted this in one inclusive thread before. This is a list that has been circulating the blogs regarding the evidence of forgery of the CBS documents. OK? Here we go: _________________________________________________________________ Some have already been clarified, but here are the running discrepancies: 1. proportional spacing not generally available (no confirmation this type of technology was available at TANG) 2. CBS admits that it does *not* have the originals, but only original documents can be proven to be real; copies can *never* be authenticated positively...repeat: only...