Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN: HARRIET MIERS HAS WITHDRAWN!

Posted on 10/27/2005 5:54:48 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper

just breaking!!!!!!!!


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0; 00000000000000000000; 00000nosantorum; 000sorryfirstkeyword; 0notsofast1stkeyword; 0real1stkeyword; 1firstkeyword; alangreenspan; alito; alltogethernow; angieharmon; borked; botsuicidewatch; bradpitt; brown; bushsquagmier; dealwithit; edithbrownclement; faves; fredthompson; harrietemiers; harrietmiers; harrietthemere; hightechlynching; humphreybogart; janicerbrown; janicerogersbrown; jellopudding; jrb; judgeclement; judicialnominees; luttig; marklevinforscotus; miers; noloyaltytopresident; noricksantorum; rightsviolated; rino; sadday; santorumdogcatcher08; scotus; snugasabuginarug; sorrybushbots; spinelessrinos; stupidsenatetricks; traitorrepubs; unjustandunfair; victory; withdrawal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740 ... 3,421-3,436 next last
To: SoFloFreeper

Halle - freakin - lujia!!!!

My heart gained back half its spark upon hearing of Miers' withdrawel.

The other half will (hopefully) return when President Bush puts up a solid, take-no-prisoners conservative originalist nominee.

I am already trying to erase this potentially huge GWB initiated mistake from my political memory.

IT's TIME TO GO ON THE OFFENSIVE, MR. PRESIDENT!!!

Not some tepid on your heels selection, either.


701 posted on 10/27/2005 6:41:52 AM PDT by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

I hope you are right but I don't think Bush works that way.


702 posted on 10/27/2005 6:41:54 AM PDT by bonfire (dwindler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 694 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
With that having been said, President Bush does now have a clear choice; he can either nominate a clear conservative or a clear liberal.

Sounds wonerful, what a bumper sticker. Do you even care if the nomination is confirmed or is it just about "making a point"?

703 posted on 10/27/2005 6:41:55 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 680 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify
***Yes, this has got to be incredibly embarrassing to all involved. I feel sorry for her.***

Don't feel sorry for her.

Remember one of her main assets was that she's a good bowler - she's got that going for her.
Oops, I'm sorry I'm being 'petulant' again.

(White Sox win the WS, she withdraws - YES!)

704 posted on 10/27/2005 6:41:58 AM PDT by Condor51 (Leftists are moral and intellectual parasites - Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile; Clint N. Suhks


I love that photo. A great jurist, courageous and with real intellect and substance.

Luttig, McConnell and Ted Olson are also good picks along with Edith Jones and Priscilla Owens.

With our pool of legal talent, it really is an embarassment of riches for Dubya.

</quagMier>

705 posted on 10/27/2005 6:42:07 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]

To: bethtopaz
what's a Mulligan?

A Mulligan's a "do over" shot in golf. I don't know whether to be happy about this or not. I just hope GW picks an unambiguous constructionist/conservative. If there has to be a knock-down drag-out fight, then so be it. I think it would hurt the Dems worse than us.

706 posted on 10/27/2005 6:42:10 AM PDT by Ranald S. MacKenzie (Its the philosophy, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 551 | View Replies]

To: Issaquahking

I would pay good money to watch her carve T. "The Swimmer" Kennedy up in hearings. : )


707 posted on 10/27/2005 6:42:10 AM PDT by Politicalmom ((Must I use a sarcasm tag?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81
It's hard for dems to oppose the second nominaton, especially of someone they already confirmed for the court of appeals.

The next one... if really a conservative... will take more heat. The dems will make what Miers has taken from our side look like childs play.

708 posted on 10/27/2005 6:42:22 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 694 | View Replies]

To: Timeout

This is also a sure sign that Rove will be indicted. This is emergency damage control, taking them one at a time.


709 posted on 10/27/2005 6:42:42 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: XJarhead
But he did promise to appoint "strict constructionist" judges, which he has done, for the most part.

But this is the big one, and he wanted us to close our eyes while he rolled the dice.

710 posted on 10/27/2005 6:42:47 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 641 | View Replies]

To: i_dont_chat

I don't know .... it wasn't me. I thought she'd end up getting confirmed.


711 posted on 10/27/2005 6:42:50 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 700 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats
and a devastating loss in the Senate when the 'Rats and moderate Republicans prevent a vote.

Do you really think Miers withdrew because of pressure from higher-ups?  I don't.  I think she is smart enough to realize that the 'masses' don't support her therefore won't support their senator.  If the masses truly want a JRB for examples, they will be more compelled to listen to their constituents particularly if they are up for re-election.  That's how it is supposed to work.
712 posted on 10/27/2005 6:42:53 AM PDT by quantim (I just reek of the antithesis of liberalism. They smell me and scatter like rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 527 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
That may be what you want.

I want a good judge on the Court. Whether they get there by acclimation or bloodbath is immaterial.

But it is heartwarming to see your love of country so beautifully expressed. It must've pained you to no end that Roberts was such a good candidate that no serious person could mount real opposition. Or that you were denied the opportunity to pay the price that is inherent in every fight.

I'm thinkin' you need to read a little Clausewitz. Or Sun-Tzu.

713 posted on 10/27/2005 6:42:55 AM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 519 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Reid up on CSPAN 2 whining that his nominee pick has withdrawn her name.


714 posted on 10/27/2005 6:43:01 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

I was for hearing her too. She deserved that much.


715 posted on 10/27/2005 6:43:05 AM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
HARRIET MIERS HAS WITHDRAWN!

Thank God. President Bush please nominate a true conservative jurist and while you're at it defend the borders of this country.

716 posted on 10/27/2005 6:43:06 AM PDT by Maynerd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

Do you really want a person on the court who is acceptable to the democrats? That's the case in a nutshell of why I can barely support the R.P. any longer. They are always willing to moderate 'the plan' to get it through. And generally that 'plan' winds up being a near mirror of democrat policy.

Simply unacceptable! There damn well should be a fight. That's how wars are won, and we're fighting for the existance of this nation in adherence to what the founding fathers vision was.


717 posted on 10/27/2005 6:43:12 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
Really. Let's see him try to say the same about her that he said about Bork.
718 posted on 10/27/2005 6:43:20 AM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 707 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Janice Rogers Brown. I think she was who GWB had in mind from the beginning.

My favorite. I would love to see Chuckie and Leaky attempt a battle of wits with JRB.

719 posted on 10/27/2005 6:43:24 AM PDT by auboy ("Don't get stuck on whiny")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

Bill Crystal just said he's SURE there will be indictments tomorrow...and more than one.


720 posted on 10/27/2005 6:43:28 AM PDT by bonfire (dwindler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 709 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740 ... 3,421-3,436 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson