Skip to comments.
CNN: HARRIET MIERS HAS WITHDRAWN!
Posted on 10/27/2005 5:54:48 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
just breaking!!!!!!!!
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0; 00000000000000000000; 00000nosantorum; 000sorryfirstkeyword; 0notsofast1stkeyword; 0real1stkeyword; 1firstkeyword; alangreenspan; alito; alltogethernow; angieharmon; borked; botsuicidewatch; bradpitt; brown; bushsquagmier; dealwithit; edithbrownclement; faves; fredthompson; harrietemiers; harrietmiers; harrietthemere; hightechlynching; humphreybogart; janicerbrown; janicerogersbrown; jellopudding; jrb; judgeclement; judicialnominees; luttig; marklevinforscotus; miers; noloyaltytopresident; noricksantorum; rightsviolated; rino; sadday; santorumdogcatcher08; scotus; snugasabuginarug; sorrybushbots; spinelessrinos; stupidsenatetricks; traitorrepubs; unjustandunfair; victory; withdrawal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640, 641-660, 661-680 ... 3,421-3,436 next last
To: conservativecorner
We gave our time and money, so when you say he won the election you need to understand that he did it by espousing a conservative agenda. Is it too damn much for us to ask the President to live up to his promises. Bull...hockey.
I remember the debate here during the 2000 primary. A whole lot of Freepers were not happy with Bush because they thought he was too moderate. They were nervous about the whole "compassionate conservatism" thing. And it was readily acknowledged that he was more of a moderate than was his brother Jeb. We knew all of that in 2000.
This stuff about him going back on all his promises is a load of bunk. Aside from CFR and steel tariffs, we basically got exactly what we elected. Was "No Child Left Behind" something that we shouldn't have expected? He pretty much campaigned on that. And he told us he'd do prescription drug coverage as well. Again, none of that was a surprise, so to say he campaigned as a "conservative" and that he hasn't "lived up to his promises" is not accurate
In 2000, we were so terrified of the prospect of the CLinton legacy being continued by Gore that we valued electability over conservatism. In 2004, we had to go with the sitting President, and valued his position on the war. And that was after he failed to veto CFR, expanded the Department of Education, etc.
I'm not saying that we were right to have supported a moderate. I'm just saying that accusing the guy of going back on his promises is bogus.
To: beyond the sea
"F. Lee Levin"
Ah, what a wonderful fantasy that would be. Can you imagine Levin facing those Congress Creatures? ... "Shut up, you moron! Next question!"
To: sinkspur
Thanks for confirming my question of Miers nomination was spot on.
To: You Dirty Rats
Watch what happens to the next nominee. Watch what 'Rat Senators and the Leftist press say. Watch the moderate Republican Senators refuse to back the President's nominee with the "nucular" option.Most of us are going to be doing considerably more than "watching" should those things start to happen. Are you?
644
posted on
10/27/2005 6:37:02 AM PDT
by
inquest
(FTAA delenda est)
To: workerbee
Let's hope all Congress critters up for re-election kindly advise him to do otherwise.Great point, there are some vulnerable seats.
To: Les_Miserables
And all those who don't hate anyone but who honestly felt she was not either qualified nor a true conservative are praying that Bush will now nominate a truly qualified conservative constructionist with a substantial track record supporting that assessment. That's right.
To: nina0113; Flux Capacitor
I gues what I'd really like is to win my ebay bid on the flux capacitor, put it in my DeLorean and have him not pick her to begin with.ROTFLMAO!
BTW you know you should ping someone when you speak of them! ;)
647
posted on
10/27/2005 6:37:13 AM PDT
by
RushCrush
(The Original Harriet Miers Free Zone ™)
To: unsycophant
Et tu Brute!!!!!!I believe President Bush has endured the
Ides of March &
Groundhog Day rolled into one!
He has seen folks (that I believed) were supportive of him, or at least, like minded....
..not only turn their backs on him....
..but pull their long knives repeatedly!
I can't abide to listen to Coulter, Ingraham, Kristol, et al...anymore and don't believe they are halfway genuine!
Some folks had 'concerns ' about Miers, but others were downright vicious!
To: NRA2BFree
If he gives us Estrada, the GOP is finished for 25 years.
So much for Rove's "McKinley" strategy.
To: visualops
That sort of nonsense is unnecessary.Indeed. We're past 600 posts now. Miers is history. Can we stop fighting over her now?!
I'm grateful to her for having the grace and loyalty to withdraw. She doesn't deserve to have us continue the unflattering remarks about her.
650
posted on
10/27/2005 6:37:15 AM PDT
by
Timeout
To: ALWAYSWELDING
Well I said the first day or two into this thing.... W has found out what it's really like to stand in the middle with both sides shooting at you.
651
posted on
10/27/2005 6:37:16 AM PDT
by
kjam22
To: pepperhead
And everyone else that didn't tow the Miers is great line needs to be congratulated as well. A White Sox win and now this...its been a good last 12 hours.
652
posted on
10/27/2005 6:37:19 AM PDT
by
BureaucratusMaximus
(The 2005 Chicago White Sox---World Series Champs---WOO! HOO!)
To: Lazamataz
653
posted on
10/27/2005 6:37:26 AM PDT
by
chris1
("Make the other guy die for his country" - George S. Patton)
To: SoFloFreeper
Good picture of a really fine justice (Janice Rogers Brown). I concur.
654
posted on
10/27/2005 6:37:35 AM PDT
by
auboy
("Don't get stuck on whiny")
To: buckeyeblogger
A caller to Laura Ingraham's radio show just brought up a great point. Will President Bush now nominate a verifiable judicial conservative or will he be angry at "us" (the base that didn't support Miers) and start meeting with Chuck Schumer and whoever to get their insight on whom to nominate?
Just something to ponder..
Doubt it. I've been suspecting for about a week that this whole nomination was a red herring, and that's coming from a Miers supporter. I think Bush didn't expect to get her in, but knew that it would be harder for the dems to oppose two of his nominees. So he used a decoy to draw the worst of the dems fire. Once again, Bush is proving himself to be a master political operator. This time him and Rove outdid themselves so much that even many of Bush's supporters were fooled, to say nothing of his opponents. If that's true, then that's M4D politicking skillz.
I vote for Janice Rogers Brown or Priscilla Owen. And not because they're women. But because they're good justices.
To: NRA2BFree
to be honest I like "W" and i trusted him, just as i do with my soldier's life. I now hope he nominates "HILLERY"
To: rollo tomasi
Wow. Thanks for the link. Hadn't seen that. I'm glad she was withdrawn. Let's hope we see Brown or Owens sent up. It's time to make clear what conservatives stand for, and Bush should not be afraid to lay it out there. Reagan did.. Bush can if he chooses to, but won't if he doesn't believe it will help HIM. Conservatives left in the Senate need to hold strong for the howling jackals that have highjacked this country. Their interests are not for Americans nor the rule of law WE believe in. Nor the nation who has sacrificed hundreds of thousands of lives for. Conservatives stand strong. Stand up. Fight back.. Take the fight TO THE ENEMY of this country. The are seated before us and we have a clear view of their intentions. They are for the power of government over the people. Do NOT let this next nomination go without a clear message to all electeds that we will not stand for a globalist to finish off the constitution protecting our individual rights. To what laws of the land will American soldier sons and daughters, mothers and fathers return to by next year? A nation whose voice and sovereignty were merely rallying words to fool a nation, at least half a nation still grateful for the vision of it's founders.
Thanks again for the link.
657
posted on
10/27/2005 6:37:39 AM PDT
by
JesseJane
(Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country. (More than a typing exercise))
To: unsycophant
658
posted on
10/27/2005 6:37:43 AM PDT
by
Solson
(I've got eyes in the back of my head.)
To: livius
You are right on the money, livius. And now we will NEVER know what HM was all about. Shame shame shame.
659
posted on
10/27/2005 6:37:43 AM PDT
by
bonfire
(dwindler)
To: TeleStraightShooter
An what if the A team took a pass on the first time around? Can you name any candidate's close friend or candidate's family member or the candidate him/herself who would back up the assertion that Miers was the only person who wanted such an apparently crappy job as SCOTUS justice? It was a creation of Karl Rove's mind.
660
posted on
10/27/2005 6:37:43 AM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640, 641-660, 661-680 ... 3,421-3,436 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson