Posted on 07/06/2004 4:33:22 AM PDT by djf
NBC breaking says for sure it's Edwards for veep
No offense, but man are you asking for it today :-)
1960; JFK & LBJ
BTW, LBJ despised Kennedy and wanted to be POTUS, but back then in the days of 'smoky back rooms', the candidate was really picked by the political machines, not the people.
LBJ 'owned' the Senate (and Texas) but Jack's dad had the Mob & the Daley Machine - kind of hard to beat that combo. The rest as they say - is history.
Edwards voted for the war along with Kerry. It will be interesting to see how they finesse it.
Could the Dims pick two more phoney persons to run for pres and vp? Oh yeah, forgot Bill and Al.
Good one! Better register that one now! In fact, too late, I'm stealing it. See my NEW Tagline!! Thanks!
Right down the drain!
Since you live in Connecticut, you probably don't realize that John Edwards has one of the worst Senate attendance and voting records, along with John Kerry. Edwards has NEVER represented the values of his constituents, but merely followed along the liberal leadership in the Senate. He had such a negative rating in North Carolina that he chose to not seek re-election. He spent the last 4 full years touring outside North Carolina in an effort to become President, forsaking his responsibilities to North Carolina citizens. He will not help Kerry in North Carolina. Both of these pukes' Senate attendance records will be heavily publicized.
This is a big political blunder among all the many the Democrats have created. Announcing his VP 3 weeks before the convention, Kerry may not even get that big bounce the media is hoping he'll get coming out of convention week.
New tagline alert
Yea,,,I'll take the Cowboy and The Man!
You need to review your history.
If Kerry does win, what really concerns me is the future makeup of the Supreme Court. There have been no new appointments in ten years, and it stands to reason that there could be several vacancies in the next four years. Can you say Chief Justice Hillary Clinton? (without choking)
Thank you for the clarification, that's what I was looking for.
I really don't think Hill is gonna move this time. She'd be running the risk of challenging a somewhat popular president during wartime, and played as un-patriotic.
She's playing her cards right. If GW wins, she's prime for 2008. If Kerry was to pull it off, I think she'd have no trouble stealing it back in 2008.
You Bugger! Mine is capitalized
"Yup, Bush and Cheney are about to sail into a shit storm."
You serioulsy think the Bush/Cheney campaign hasn't prepared for this?
They Might Be Midgets
now, now "Don't don't don't let's start"!!
I honestly think Dim internal polling was suggesting that Bush had weathered the storms of this spring that the media had created full-bore against him and that he might sink too far if he waited. Anyone have info to support this hypothesis out there (I know folks who know are here reading this)
TWO JOHNS ... NO WAITING
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.