Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Americans Had Better Wake Up’: Biden Admin Fires Next Regulatory Salvo In Its Push For EVs
Daily Caller ^ | 7/28/23 | Nick Pope

Posted on 07/29/2023 10:19:52 AM PDT by Libloather

The Biden administration proposed a new and ambitious set of fuel economy standards for cars and light-duty trucks Friday, its latest move to prod American consumers towards adopting electric vehicles (EVs).

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), a subagency of the Department of Transportation (DOT), unveiled the updated Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards, which would require cars and lighter trucks to improve their respective fuel efficiencies by 2% and 4% starting in 2027, according to a DOT press release announcing the proposal.

The rule would also mandate work vans and pickup trucks to increase their fuel efficiencies by 10% each year, starting in 2030, according to the DOT press release. If manufacturers fail to meet the stipulations of the proposed CAFE standards, they will have to pay punitive fines to the government, according to the rule’s text.

General Motors voiced its concerns to the Biden administration about prospective new fuel economy standards, telling administration officials in mid-July that such standards could cost American automobile manufacturers as much as $100 billion in 2031 and $300 billion over a five-year timeline, according to Reuters. The administration reportedly dismissed General Motors’s concerns, telling the company that their analysis was incorrect.

“This is an EV mandate and further evidence that the elites want normal people to hoof it or take the bus,” Dan Kish, senior fellow at the Institute for Energy Research, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “Americans had better wake up, because cars will soon be so expensive that people won’t be able to afford them.”

The NHTSA believes that the proposal will save Americans money at the gas pump while boosting American auto manufacturing and reducing reliance on foreign oil, the press release says.

However, the agency has conceded that the rule would saddle the auto manufacturing industry...

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: automotive; biden; bidencrookedregime; bidenvoters; brandon; bus; cafe; electric; electricvehicle; electricvehicles; ev; evs; greatreset; nhtsa; regulations; unconstitutional; vehicles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: Jacquerie

Once they steal 2024 the gloves will be off. Biden, Newsom or whomever, it won’t matter. They’ll turn the US into CA to complete Bammy’s fundamental transformation.

But, we’ll just keep voting and pretend it matters.

Or we could all just stop voting. I would love to see what we could say with that.

I agree with you, however.


41 posted on 07/29/2023 12:10:13 PM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
Clearly, China and India are the world's biggest polluters, and emit more CO2 (that "dangerous gas" 'n all that) than the rest of the world combined.

A lot of China's air pollution travels to California via air currents. We are forced to live under government mandates to not burn and pollute, while China is free to do so and send their pollutants to us.

So yes, China and India pollute with abandon. In India, millions of villagers collect wood every day for burning in their stoves to cook. Why no mandates against that? Etc. Can't wait for the White House moron and his minions to go away.

42 posted on 07/29/2023 12:14:42 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Ride ze bus. Eat ze bugs. EUTHANIZE ze DEMOCRATS!


43 posted on 07/29/2023 12:29:48 PM PDT by OHPatriot (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarMema

I cast my first vote in 1972 for Richard Nixon and haven’t missed an election since.

However, in 2016 I stopped voting in congressional elections.

While I did and will vote for Trump again, and participate in state and local elections, I have no respect for Congress and will not condone the Uniparty.

My three congressional members from FL are GOP. “Eff ‘em all.


44 posted on 07/29/2023 1:15:34 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

After this election, if they steal it again, what if only half the country voted next time?


45 posted on 07/29/2023 1:19:46 PM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Good thing the Biden administration will be gone end of next year a lot of clean up work ahead.

Prison visiting hours 12:00pm to 2:00pm Sundays


46 posted on 07/29/2023 1:23:25 PM PDT by Vaduz (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
72 miles per gallon of gas is pretty good. I’d rather they go this route then electric cars. Not everything is a bad thing. I remember when you complained that cars were going from 10 miles to the gallon to 25 miles a gallon. The sky is falling. Lol.

You are clearly not an engineer or even mathmatically inclined what so ever. Stupid.

47 posted on 07/29/2023 1:26:28 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MarMema

<>After this election, if they steal it again, what if only half the country voted next time?<>

It won’t matter to our oligarchs in the Imperial City, Washington DC, Rome-on-the-Potomac.

Hmmm. Perhaps the Uniparty will pass a law that makes voting mandatory and subject to felony prosecution for violations?


48 posted on 07/29/2023 1:46:27 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: leaning conservative

They did that already. He just printed his own ballots.


49 posted on 07/29/2023 1:47:43 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

It would be a statement however. If it comes to that I think we should consider a mass abstainment.


50 posted on 07/29/2023 1:58:39 PM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: central_va

And your a dried up fossil that we don’t have to suffer for long.


51 posted on 07/29/2023 2:18:00 PM PDT by napscoordinator (DeSantis is a beast! Florida is the freest state in the country! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Not to democrats. They prefer solar & wind.


52 posted on 07/29/2023 2:22:54 PM PDT by entropy12 (Career politicians are there to build wealth. Trump is in there to lose wealth to serve people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Carriage Hill

Name Barack Hussein Obama ring a bell?


53 posted on 07/29/2023 2:24:27 PM PDT by entropy12 (Career politicians are there to build wealth. Trump is in there to lose wealth to serve people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

Good!


54 posted on 07/29/2023 2:48:02 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (Disband and Defund the putrid FBI. America does not need an out of control Gestapo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“The NHTSA believes that the proposal will save Americans money at the gas pump while boosting American auto manufacturing and reducing reliance on foreign oil”

They don’t believe in any such thing. All government departments always promises to save us money and create jobs while laying down their onerous regulations. And it never comes true. For example, millions of Americans are still waiting on their annual 2600 in savings on their health care thanks to Obamacare.


55 posted on 07/29/2023 3:05:25 PM PDT by lowbridge ("Let’s check with Senator Schumer before we run it" - NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), a subagency of the Department of Transportation (DOT), unveiled the updated Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards, which would require cars and lighter trucks to improve their respective fuel efficiencies by 2% and 4% starting in 2027, according to a DOT press release announcing the proposal.

Doe the efficiency-improvement mandate apply to EV's as well?

56 posted on 07/29/2023 3:08:08 PM PDT by gitmo (If your theology doesn’t become your biography, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

EVs are a waste of money and resources, not to mention time.


57 posted on 07/29/2023 3:20:29 PM PDT by popdonnelly (All the enormous crimes in history have been committed by governments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

I’m thinking back to LBJ’s “Great Society” and forward, under almost all administrations.


58 posted on 07/29/2023 3:26:46 PM PDT by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The rule would also mandate work vans and pickup trucks to increase their fuel efficiencies by 10% each year, starting in 2030, according to the DOT press release. If manufacturers fail to meet the stipulations of the proposed CAFE standards, they will have to pay punitive fines to the government, according to the rule’s text.

But...

...we were supposed to get STRAW for our bricks!!!

59 posted on 07/29/2023 6:00:16 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Last year, Gavin Newsom and the California Air Resources Board, decreed that no new internal combustion vehicles can be sold in California in 2035.

No wonder Carvana etal are buying up all the USED ones!!

60 posted on 07/29/2023 6:02:15 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson