Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

POLITICS Report: Jay Sekulow Floated as Trumpís Next SCOTUS Justice Nominee
WayneDupreeShow ^ | Feb. 6, 20 | Missy Crane

Posted on 02/09/2020 4:01:46 AM PST by WWG1WWA

Snip~

He led #TeamTrump to victory in the U.S. Senate and managed to destroy Joe and Hunter Biden in the process – all without breaking a sweat.

Sekulow is President Trump’s lead counsel. The two have a very close relationship and unlike many lawyers who have gotten the boot by President Trump, Mr. Sekulow has stood the test of time.

(Excerpt) Read more at waynedupree.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: aclj; no; scotus; sekulow; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
Yes! The SC would never be the same. This is one smart, dedicated Conservative lawyer. Please make it happen. I've been a fan of Sekulow for years.

Did you know Jay Sekulow has a band?

https://youtu.be/om-oM-gXPEs

1 posted on 02/09/2020 4:01:46 AM PST by WWG1WWA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WWG1WWA

Not my choice. Next SG perhaps.


2 posted on 02/09/2020 4:04:04 AM PST by jimfree (My19 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than an 8 year Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

What is your reasoning concerning Sekulow?


3 posted on 02/09/2020 4:06:16 AM PST by WWG1WWA (Brothers, what we do in life echoes eternity." -Marcus Aurelius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WWG1WWA

63 yo


4 posted on 02/09/2020 4:10:46 AM PST by gasport (The dung beetle should be the symbol of the Democrat Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WWG1WWA

He’s already 63. The confirmation hearing would refight the impeachment trial. It’s a fun speculation, but I’m afraid it’s dead on arrival. Solicitor General, if it gaps in the next term, is a shorter gig by definition and would be a great honorific to add to Sekulow’s resume.


5 posted on 02/09/2020 4:12:57 AM PST by jimfree (My19 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than an 8 year Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

That’s a point. Still, he could easily do 20 on the court and it would never be the same. I’d love to see him take on Roberts. What a show that would be.


6 posted on 02/09/2020 4:16:08 AM PST by WWG1WWA (Brothers, what we do in life echoes eternity." -Marcus Aurelius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

Jay is a good choice.


7 posted on 02/09/2020 4:17:25 AM PST by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

You don’t move someone who is right for the job hr’d in. Not sure he would even want it.


8 posted on 02/09/2020 4:17:51 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WWG1WWA
Still, he could easily do 20 on the court and it would never be the same

Same argument for Harriet Myers.

He's never been a judge.

9 posted on 02/09/2020 4:20:56 AM PST by Jim Noble (There is nothing racist in stating plainly what most people already know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WWG1WWA

Not a good idea. Need a much younger constitutionalist who has at least some experience on the bench of an appeals court.. While he has had great success arguing several religious freedom cases before the Supreme Court he has no experience as a judge and any confirmation hearings would focus on his advocacy rather than his ability to be unbiased. Appointing someone that has been a close advisor to the President is simply an invitation to make it totally political. The battle will be hard enough without adding personal relationship issues.


10 posted on 02/09/2020 4:23:01 AM PST by LibertyOh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

True, but legally that is not a requirement.


11 posted on 02/09/2020 4:23:58 AM PST by WWG1WWA (Brothers, what we do in life echoes eternity." -Marcus Aurelius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Love Jay, but I think Cruz would be a better choice.


12 posted on 02/09/2020 4:27:14 AM PST by misanthrope (Deranged, sinister, deplorable troll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WWG1WWA

Amy Barrett most likely next up for appointment...to replace Ginsberg.


13 posted on 02/09/2020 4:28:39 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WWG1WWA
Wow, they are good.......

Check this one out

https://www.facebook.com/JaySekulowBand/videos/421368045184117/

14 posted on 02/09/2020 4:29:42 AM PST by Hot Tabasco (I want an impeachment pen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyOh

A good point as well. I’m thinking that if we take back the House it would make all the difference. The Crats have been so busy destroying themselves, it will be a whole different landscape in 2021.


15 posted on 02/09/2020 4:32:07 AM PST by WWG1WWA (Brothers, what we do in life echoes eternity." -Marcus Aurelius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: misanthrope

You don’t pull a Senator for the job.


16 posted on 02/09/2020 4:32:49 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: misanthrope

Someone who doesn’t follow the Constitution when it’s not in their favor isn’t someone who should be on the bench.


17 posted on 02/09/2020 4:38:02 AM PST by ASA Vet (Jus Soli + Jus sanguinis = NBC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: WWG1WWA

Ted Cruz would be a great SCJ. Provided we win a lot of senatorial seats from dims.


18 posted on 02/09/2020 4:42:10 AM PST by Chickensoup (Voter ID for 2020!! Leftists totalitarian fascists appear to be planning to eradicate conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WWG1WWA

Too old. Maybe another federal court.


19 posted on 02/09/2020 4:43:36 AM PST by Preachin' (I stand with many voters who will never vote for a pro abortion candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

Someone who doesn’t follow the Constitution when it’s not in their favor isn’t someone who should be on the bench.


20 posted on 02/09/2020 4:46:35 AM PST by ASA Vet (Jus Soli + Jus sanguinis = NBC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson