Did you know Jay Sekulow has a band?
Not my choice. Next SG perhaps.
63 yo
Not a good idea. Need a much younger constitutionalist who has at least some experience on the bench of an appeals court.. While he has had great success arguing several religious freedom cases before the Supreme Court he has no experience as a judge and any confirmation hearings would focus on his advocacy rather than his ability to be unbiased. Appointing someone that has been a close advisor to the President is simply an invitation to make it totally political. The battle will be hard enough without adding personal relationship issues.
Amy Barrett most likely next up for appointment...to replace Ginsberg.
Check this one out
https://www.facebook.com/JaySekulowBand/videos/421368045184117/
Ted Cruz would be a great SCJ. Provided we win a lot of senatorial seats from dims.
Too old. Maybe another federal court.
Jay, at this time, is U.S. Court of Appeals-level material. Alternately, appointment to one of the independent commissions, e.g. FCC. To keep our caucus together, we need nominees that our weak sisters can support. They will - maybe - support principled conservatives who have established a track record on the U.S. Court of Appeals or a State Supreme Court. Plus, it would be good for Trump to nominate a principled conservative who is female. While, the President is no longer restricted by his campaign promise, the list he developed back then has many very fine potential nominees.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_Supreme_Court_candidates#Possible_nominees
HA! Doubt that it’s true but it is like sticking the puppy’s nose in his mess.
Need to go young with these SCOTUS picks. Sekulow is into his 60s.
Sekulow’s history is rather astounding.
Argued his *first* SCOTUS case at age 30?!
Very few attorneys get to SCOTUS in their entire careers. What most people don’t seem to realize is that the Supremes agree to hear a very small number of cases each year. One party has to petition the court and wait. The court will only hear those issues it deems to have such significant national or public policy importance that it has no real choice but to resolve it with finality.
How many times has Sekulow been up there? I believe it’s 12, is that correct? Just amazing.
A truly brilliant legal mind. This is all we’re really seeking; not ideology. Rather, justices who will remain faithful to the law as it is written.
That shouldn’t be such an outrageous request.
He is also a Jew for Jesus.
Fun to see him take on whatever the corrupt dems on the judiciary committee throw at him
I hate the term “floated” unless it’s used on someone I don’t like. I like Jay. I’d rather have him on the high court than RBG or any of those other commies.
I believe Jay is the founder of the ACLJ "American Center for Law and Justice", which is the antithesis of the ACLU.
https://aclj.org/
Many are “floated,” but the choice will be a judge with experience—one who would and could support our Second Amendment. The appointee will not be chosen with regard to sex, religion or race but rather merit alone. Our freedoms and nation are at stake, and there’s no room for the errors too often imposed by hysterical factions this time.
Very good man. DJT’s Rommel, who’s wall really worked.
I say yes.
Beware of a judge who would support criminals for bearing arms while being willing to agree with so-called assault weapons bans under state and local jurisdictions.
Like it...
Wow really good band