Skip to comments.
Support for a Young Earth? Scientists Baffled by Preserved Dinosaur Blood Cells [Psalms 85:11]
CNS News ^
| 6/15/2015
| Garrett Haley
Posted on 07/09/2015 9:48:38 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
LONDON The discovery of well-preserved blood and proteins in a supposedly 75-million-year-old dinosaur fossil has stumped secular scientists and led one Christian apologist to herald the findings as evidence of a young Earth.
A team of scientists at the U.K.s Imperial College London carefully examined eight Cretaceous dinosaur bones discovered in North America, scrutinizing the bones interiors with an electron microscope. The researchers were stunned when they discovered what appeared to be red blood cells in one of the specimens.
Upon closer examination, the British scientists identified an internal structure within the dinosaur cells, complete with nuclei and amino acids. Then, in addition to the blood cells, the scientists discovered excellently-preserved collagen, which is a common soft tissue.
The scientists published their findings last week in Nature Communications, emphasizing that the dinosaur bones they studied were not exceptionally preserved.
It has long been accepted that protein molecules decay in relatively short periods of time and cannot be preserved for longer than 4 million years, the researchers noted. They described the discovery of preserved blood cells and soft tissue as unprecedented and very exciting...
(Excerpt) Read more at christiannews.net ...
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: belongsinreligion; blood; christianmythology; creationism; dinosaur; dna; earth; evolution; nonsense; notanewstopic; notasciencetopic; paleontology; superstition
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
Psalms 85:11 Truth shall spring out of the earth; and righteousness shall look down from heaven.
To: Jan_Sobieski
Lol! Cue pic of Jesus riding a dinosaur.
2
posted on
07/09/2015 9:54:25 AM PDT
by
GunRunner
To: Jan_Sobieski
“If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be persuaded even if someone rises from the dead.”
3
posted on
07/09/2015 9:55:08 AM PDT
by
Fester Chugabrew
(Even the compassion of the wicked is cruel.)
To: Zionist Conspirator
4
posted on
07/09/2015 9:55:08 AM PDT
by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
To: Jan_Sobieski
5
posted on
07/09/2015 9:55:27 AM PDT
by
dadfly
To: Jan_Sobieski
The 4.5 billion year figure on the age of the Earth they’ve been bantering on about just didn’t seem right to me. I have no way of actually knowing, but it seemed to me that at some point there could very easily be a retraction of that figure, in favor of one much shorter.
Well there be a shorter age determination? I’m not sure about it. My gut says yes. We all know what that’s worth.
LOL
6
posted on
07/09/2015 9:56:49 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Conservatism: Now home to liars too. And we'll support them. Yea... GOPe)
To: Jan_Sobieski
I can picture Noah on deck; “I think we’re going to need a bigger Ark.”
7
posted on
07/09/2015 9:57:37 AM PDT
by
Bringbackthedraft
(2016 The RNC better come up with a Winner this time. Run some one like Cruz and Go for Broke!)
To: Jan_Sobieski
Support for a Young Earth? Not in the least.
8
posted on
07/09/2015 9:57:40 AM PDT
by
gdani
(No sacred cows)
To: DoughtyOne
Well there be a s...
Will there be a s...
9
posted on
07/09/2015 9:57:44 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Conservatism: Now home to liars too. And we'll support them. Yea... GOPe)
To: Jan_Sobieski
The researchers were stunned when they discovered what appeared to be red blood cells in one of the specimens. Upon closer examination, the British scientists identified an internal structure within the dinosaur cells, complete with nuclei and amino acids. If I remember my HS Biology correctly, red blood cells do not have nuclei.
10
posted on
07/09/2015 10:00:32 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: fishtank
To: DoughtyOne
” The 4.5 billion year figure on the age of the Earth theyve been bantering on about just didnt seem right to me”
Because you have a brain that functions most of the time : )
12
posted on
07/09/2015 10:04:22 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
To: Jan_Sobieski
Because dragons are myths, of course....
13
posted on
07/09/2015 10:07:21 AM PDT
by
roamer_1
(Globalism is just socialism in a business suit.)
To: tacticalogic
The discovery of well-preserved blood and proteins in a supposedly 75-million-year-old dinosaur fossil has stumped secular scientists and led one Christian apologist to herald the findings as evidence of a young Earth.
A team of scientists at the U.K.s Imperial College London carefully examined eight Cretaceous dinosaur bones discovered in North America, scrutinizing the bones interiors with an electron microscope. The researchers were stunned when they discovered what appeared to be red blood cells in one of the specimens.
Upon closer examination, the British scientists identified an internal structure within the dinosaur cells, complete with nuclei and amino acids.
IM NOT CERTAIN that they meant to say that nuclei were discovered within the Blood Cells as protein cells were also under the microscope
14
posted on
07/09/2015 10:08:06 AM PDT
by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: GunRunner
How `bout a hug?
15
posted on
07/09/2015 10:10:17 AM PDT
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: gdani
16
posted on
07/09/2015 10:12:40 AM PDT
by
sopwith
(getting a six pack)
To: sopwith
17
posted on
07/09/2015 10:13:53 AM PDT
by
sopwith
(getting a six pack)
To: tacticalogic
“If I remember my HS Biology correctly, red blood cells do not have nuclei.”
That is correct, but only for mammals. Dinosaurs weren’t mammals.
To: MeshugeMikey
IM NOT CERTAIN that they meant to say that nuclei were discovered within the Blood Cells as protein cells were also under the microscope The only cells mentioned are the red blood cells. I don't see any mention of "protein cells", nor do I recall ever seeing that term in the chapters on the various cell types (but that was some considerable number of years ago).
19
posted on
07/09/2015 10:16:20 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: Jan_Sobieski
Why do so many Christians get stuck on the idea that a “day” in the Genesis story is one revolution of the earth during annual orbit around the sun, or 24 hours?
According to the story, the first day of creation doesn’t even have the earth revolving between night and day at all!
Hence, it is obvious to me at least that the term “day” was used as a symbolism for one phase following another.
The genesis story wasn’t originally given to educated people. I believe that God used symbolism that was simple for them to understand.
20
posted on
07/09/2015 10:17:13 AM PDT
by
teppe
(... for my God ... for my Family ... for my Country ....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson