THE MSM RECRUITS IT'S READERS TO HELP SMEAR SARAH PALIN

JEFFHEAD.COM ^ | 10 June 2011 | Jeff Head

[Jeff Head]

THE MSM & THE LEFT ENLIST READERS TO HELP SMEAR SARAH PALIN
OR...OH HOW THEY HATE HER! By: Jeff Head, 6/10/2011
[SARAH 2012] - [SARAH-IMMIGRATION] - [BEST FRIEND] - [NOW,NOW,NOW] - [PALIN HIDING?] - [FAREWELL AS GOV]



If you didn't need any more proof to the contrary, the left, the mainstream media (who in large represents the left), the DNC, and many establishment, RINO politicians are scared to death of Sarah Palin and will do anything in their power to keep her from becoming President of these United States, or even intertaining the prospect.

Witness the actions today, the 10th of June, 2011, of three major news media outlets enlisting their own readers to help smear her.

In the run up to today's events, they have smearing her since the 2008 campaign, they have intruded into her family's difficulties and personal lives, they have lied about her and her record, they have camped out on her door step, in her town, and hounded her every step when she is traveling...literally stalking her 24x7, everywhere she goes.

They have done so in a heated, angry, viscous manner...using what they themselves would call, "hate language," threats, inuendo, discrimination...you name it.

Why do they do this? The answer is simple.

As stated earlier, they fear her. They fear what she represents. Here is an extremely talented, extremely successful, happily married woman who has done very well financially, politically, and in almost every endeavor she puts herself to. She has the full support of a loving, hard working husband. How can the left, the DNC, the press, and the RINOs...the so-called "champions" of women's rights fear and literally hate this?

Again, the answer is simple.

She is a conservative Christian, dedicated to the founding principles of this nation, wouldn't abort her down's syndrom baby, large, traditional family, woman. As such, she puts the lie to all of their entitlement, "you must have our help" politicians and ideologs who really do not care for women's rights, but who are driven by ideology and power to control others into thinking they are...and entrapping millions of poor souls into believeing it so they can use government to impower themselves and use the government and all of our treasure to control those whom they can fool into following them.

And they want to fool ALL of us into doing it so they can gather absolute power over this nation...thereby fundamentall transforimng and changing it (funny, haven;t we heard this song and dance before? As most lately in the 2008 Presidential election?).

So, here in June of 2011, as Sarah Palin is traveling about the country on tour speaking xonservatively and, perhaps considering a Presidential run in 2012...the left, the DNC and the Press are, without a shred of shame, consorting together to stop her at any cost. Here on June 10th, 2011, three (and the number is growing in what is obviously a concerted, orchestrated effort) major news media outlets, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and the Los Angeles Times, are releaseing something on the order of 24,000 emails they have gathered from Sarah Palin's days as Governor of Alaska, and enlisting their own readers and the public to pour through them for those outlets (in other words...do their work for them) and find any email, any shred of what they are calling "Interesting and Newsworthy" information they may find in them.

NEW YORK TIMES
NY Times asks readers to help dig up 'Interesting and Newsworthy' Palin emails
http://www.mrc.org/timeswatch/articles/2011/20110609034640.aspx

LOS ANGELES TIMES
LA Time to Post data base of Palin email
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/help-analyze-the-palin-emails/2011/06/08/AGZAaHNH_blog.html

WASHINGTON POST
"Help Analyze the Palin emails"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/help-analyze-the-palin-emails/2011/06/08/AGZAaHNH_blog.html

Really?

All three outlets (and probbaly many more before the day is out) happened to do this on the same day? Really? They want to use the public at large to try and join them in their smear tactics? Really? They have done this to so many other politicians, particularly democrats?

Really?

Smells like shades of Dan Rather to me.

But, as Dan Rather failed in his own attempt to use fraud and deceipt to discredit a sitting President, they too shall fail in their attempts against Sarah Palin.

Why?

Precisely because Sarah Palin represents so ably those very things the left and these pundits and poiticians are so afraid of. tradiational American values. Honor, integrity, moral values, a belief in and reliance upon God in Heaven, and a dedication to the fundamental principles that underly the Constitution of ths land...all of which these people are so devoid of and seperated from by their own ambition, averace, dis-honor, and lack of moral integrity.

They cannot fathom how her traditional, down to earth, unsophisticated manners and rock solid values appeal to a growing number of Americans...and in numbers I will wager, that will crush them at the polls.

But they fear she might...thus the prolonged, viscous nature of their vitriol against her.

As Air Force poliots are fond of saying...You know when you are directly over the target because that is when you take the most flak!

All I can say is...GO SARAH GO!

God grant that she does run, and God grant us another monumental, crushing victory in 2012...like the one that occurred in 2010...over the left and any whose aim is the detruction and fuindamental change of America and these United States and the way of life and liberty she has created, defended and preserved.

THE GREAT FEAR OF THE LEFT AND DNC: THIS PIC APPLIED TO JANUARY 2013

“The lamestream media is no longer a cornerstone of democracy in America. They need help. They need to regain their credibility and some respect. There are some pretty sick puppies in the industry today. They really need help.

“I have lost all respect for the ‘mainstream’ media because they lied; and still lie. And they abuse America’s freedom of the press — because with freedom comes responsibility. My son chose to put his life on the line to defend that freedom, and I feel like his, and every good soldier’s, efforts are thrown in their faces when the press takes advantage of their sacrifices instead of respecting the freedoms they’re willing to die for,” Sarah Palin, July 2010

---

AMERICA AT THE CROSSROADS OF HISTORY

12 PRINICPLES TO RESTORE AMERICA

[fantom]

I have no argument with you position , i agree , but based on real activity it is hard to argue with my assertion that the pub leadership was absent for Haley , hostile to Odonell and out right hateful and aggressive to Palin. The only republican women these old farts support are the Maine girls and Merk from Alaska. Sorry . I think conservative women will do much better without relying on these fossils .

[oh8eleven]

The lesson is this: pursue your convictions
A lesson that all of America should have learned from ...

[Polybius]

I’m sure our Freeper friends who are so concerned about Sarah Palin’s lack of “electability” will visit us shortly along with all the other anti-Palin campaigners, and try to use this as another “indicator” that she can’t win.

The fact that Sarah Palin cannot win the general election has absolutely nothing to do with this so-called "indicator". This is just another liberal media attack in an endless series of liberal media attacks.

The liberal media attacks Sarah Palin for exactly the same reasons that the liberal media used to attack Dan Quayle:

1.) Dan Quayle was a very easy target and Sarah Palin is a very easy target

2.) Dan Quayle was unpopular with the majority of voters and Sarah Palin is unpopular with the majority of voters

3.) The liberal media painted Dan Quayle as the face of the Republican Party and the liberal media now paints Sarah Palin as the face of the Republican Party

4.) By continuously attacking Dan Quayle, the liberal media ridiculed the entire Republican Party, in the eyes of the majority of voters, by painting the entire Republican Party as "The Party of Dan Quayle".

5.) By continuously attacking Sarah Palin, the liberal media now ridicules the entire Republican Party, in the eyes of the majority of voters, by painting the entire Republican Party as "The Party of Sarah Palin".

The actual reasons that Sarah Palin cannot win the general Presidential election in 2012 (and the reason that the liberal media tries so hard to paint the Republican Party as "The Party of Sarah Palin") are plain and simple to anybody that is not blinded by an irrational worship of Sarah Palin:

1.) Sixty five percent (65%) of all voters state that they "will DEFINITELY NOT vote for" Sarah Palin. (See graph below)

2.) Fifty seven percent (57%) of all voters have an "Unfavorable" impression of Sarah Palin. (See graph below)

3.) Seventy one percent (71%) of all voters state that they do NOT believe that Sarah Palin would make a good President. (See graph below)

Only an individual that is totally mesmerized by an irrational Cult of Personality can claim, with a straight face, that they do not have extremely serious concerns about the "electability" of such a candidate as the GOP nominee for President of the United States.

Mindlessly chanting the mantras of Palin Worship ("PDS! PDS! PDS! PDS!") will get you praise and admiration from fellow mantra chanters on these FR Sarah Palin Worship & Devotional Threads but nominating such a candidate will absolutely GUARANTEE the reelection of Barack Hussein Obama in 2012 and devastate the future of America.

America simply cannot afford another four years of Marxist Barack Hussein Obama in the White House. It is time to get serious and seek a conservative candidate that will enter the race with an actual chance of defeating Barack Hussein Obama in 2012.

At least on the Planet Earth, you cannot win a general election when sixty five percent (65%) of all voters state that they "will DEFINITELY NOT vote for you.

Your mileage on Planet Sarah Palin obviously varies.

FOX News Poll (February 7-9, 2011)

Question 3: I am going to read you a list of names. Tell me if you think that person would make a good President or not.

Sarah Palin:

.................YES.........NO.......DK.....Never heard of

ALL...........23%.......72%.........4%.......1%

Dem ...........7%........87%........5%.......1%

Rep ...........40%.......56%.......3%.......1%

Ind ...........25%........69%.......3%.......1%

[Yosemitest]

Here's why.

If Sarah Palin Gets in the Race, She Will be the Candidate to Beat
June 8, 2011

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: There's a story out there today, and it's an illustration of how things happen, how things are said and reported.
This is preposterous, and I have personal knowledge of this.
Now, this story appears in the New York Daily News, and the headline is:
"Margaret Thatcher Won't Meet with Sarah Palin During Her Trip to London, En Route to Sudan: Report
-- Margaret Thatcher, the former U.K. Prime Minister --
and heroine of the former Alaska governor
-- has no interest in meeting the 'nuts' potential presidential candidate, Thatcher aides tell British media.
Palin recently revealed that she'll make a stop in London en route to Sudan this summer.
'I am just hoping Mrs. Thatcher is well enough to see me as I so admire her,'
the Tea Party favorite told Britain's Sunday Times.


"But the feeling isn't mutual.
'Lady Thatcher will not be seeing Sarah Palin.
That would be belittling for Margaret.
Sarah Palin is nuts,'
a source told the Guardian.
An aide told the Independent that the 86-year-old conservative rarely makes public appearances due to her declining health.
'Nowadays, the Lady rarely meets people at all,'
the aide said.
'If a meeting went ahead, it would be very much low-key,
and would very much depend on how things were on the day.
We don't make firm appointments for this sort of meeting.'"


Now, personal disclosure here,
I happen to know Margaret Thatcher.
I happen to know her pretty well.
I haven't talked to her in years, but I've known her for years.
And I got to know her very well through some mutual friends of mine here in Palm Beach, Florida,
Stanley and Gay Gaines, who are very close friends of hers.
I have driven Lady Thatcher around golf courses.
We were out in Vail, Colorado, in Ego Springs.
It's actually Eagle Springs but we call it Ego Springs, Colorado.
The Gaines had a home out there at one time
and we'd go out in the summertime now and then, play golf,
and Lady Thatcher and her husband, Sir Denis were guests a number of times, for a week, long weekends.
And I remember Lady Thatcher wanted to see the golf course, so we grabbed a golf cart,
she was always dressed to the nines each and every day, was wearing a dress,
we got in the golf cart and I drove all 18 holes on the cart path, never went on the course but just showed her every hole.

We'd drive up and because of etiquette we would stop if there were players on tee boxes getting ready to tee off
or if they were in the fairway near where we were we would stop so as not to distract,
and you should see the looks, double-takes all over the place.
Here's Margaret Thatcher on a golf cart at Ego Springs golf club being driven around by me, El Rushbo,
and people are doing double-takes because she's instantly recognizable.
I have been with her in social and professional settings as well.
It's obvious that her health is not today what it was,
but back in the day, Margaret Thatcher would in no way allow an aide to refer to anybody, Sarah Palin notwithstanding, as "nuts."
She talked to anybody and everybody that came into her orb.
I mean she literally had to talk to some people that were nuts.
I saw it and she was as gracious as she could be.
It was an education being around Lady Thatcher.
It was one of the experiences of my life that I'll never forget.
I can tell you that you have here an aide saying,
"Ain't no way Lady Thatcher's gonna meet with that nutso Sarah Palin."
I guarantee you Lady Thatcher is probably not aware that the aide is even saying this.
That is not the way she speaks.

Now, don't misunderstand, I'm not saying she'd be a Palin supporter,
I don't want to go there,
but I mean Reagan met with Bill Clinton after he was inaugurated and gave him some jelly beans.
This is absurd for this to be the case,
but this is a classic illustration of what is happening in the press,
not just here, but around the world with Sarah Palin.
Now, I mentioned at the close of the program yesterday, I wanted to develop something a little further today
that I didn't have time to get into in great detail yesterday, and it's about Palin.
As you know I have no brief for Palin,
I've not chosen anybody, I've not anointed anybody, I've not endorsed anybody,
and I'm not prepared to today; that's not the point of this.
But I can't let this go by, all of these things that are happening, this continued effort to literally destroy her.
I mean I understand the Democrats wanting to do it, but there are people on our side engaging in this.
That's unseemly.

Now, for all of the stated Republican opposition to Sarah Palin, if she gets in the race,
and you heard it here first, and don't doubt me,
she is going to end up being the one to beat.
Now, I'm not gonna mention any names here because it's not the point,
but I have spoken to a number of people in the Republican presidential field.
We got Rick Santorum coming on this afternoon.
Two o'clock we got Santorum, so top of the third hour we got Santorum today.
Gonna be interviewing David Mamet after the program tomorrow for the Limbaugh Letter.
This guy's written a big book.
He's the lib playwright who's undergone this massive conversion to conservatism and away from liberalism, and the things he's saying about liberalism are just right on the money.
He's abandoning it, so we'll talk to him about that tomorrow.
But I talked to a lot of these people.

I make it a point to bring up Palin because I want to see how they react,
'cause I know how I react when people bring up so-called competitors to me.
(interruption) Well, Snerdley, that's my point.
You know, it doesn't benefit me at all to comment on anybody else who does what I do.
There's no win in it. So I don't.
But these guys, you know,
I've thrown Palin's name out and the reaction that I get from virtually all of them is cautious respect.
None of them have trashed her to me.
None of them have done anything other than demonstrate or express respect for her.
I've not talked to all of them, of course,
but I've not heard one of them just lambaste her like you see other Republicans doing.
If she does decide to get in the race, and I have no idea about that, she will be the one to beat.

Now, there's a reason McCain picked her.
He picked her ostensibly against the wishes of the party at large.
He picked her because
he needed somebody fresh and energetic to restart his floundering campaign,
and it worked. And anybody who's willing to be honest will tell you
that the crowds that were drawn during the McCain campaign stops were due to Sarah Palin.
And the energy that she brought to that campaign was unmistakable,
and the attachment that Republican voters had to her was also unmistakable.
Now, we've gone through all the reasons Republicans don't want her in the race,
the insiders versus the outsiders, the Beltway elites and all that,
the consultants, GOP operatives.
They don't want her in the race not because they fear she will lose.
The standard line, and you heard it from our caller Vinny in Queens,
"Rush, I love Palin, love you, but she's gonna lose.
The media's destroyed her. She's got no chance.
I'm sick and tired of backing people that are gonna lose, Rush."

Right, okay, so we just chalk it up, media has another victory, is that it?
We sit here, we let the media destroy one of our candidates and we move on to somebody the media hasn't destroyed?
Somehow that just doesn't sit well with me.
I mean on the one hand I have people constantly complaining about the media destroying our guys
and nobody ever defends our guys
and here they go out and destroy Palin.
"Well, she's destroyed, Rush, it's impossible.
I don't think that she can win,
and I'm really tired of nominating losers and so forth.
I hate to say it, Rush, the media's just totally destroyed her."
Fine.
This is that cut-and-dry?
You're happy with that?
No. They don't want her in the race
not because they fear that she can't beat Obama.
They don't want her in the race
because they are afraid she can beat others in the Republican field for the nomination,
leaving them on the outside looking in.

Look at it this way.
With as much piling on of Sarah Palin as there has been on our side,
if she gets in and if she wins,
look at all of the people on our side who are by virtue of the way they've treated her up 'til now are out of it.
They will have no role.
When she went to New Hampshire on the bus tour and happened on the very day the Mittster announced himself
she's up there taking and stealing his thunder and at the same time she's making her appearance while he's making his,
she is denouncing and disagreeing with some of his policies.
A lot of people said,
"Well, that's really stupid.
This is another example of Palin being an idiot.
Why, she's not even consulting with the Republican hierarchy on this bus tour.
She ought to be coordinating her schedule so she doesn't step on some of these other people."

Well, wait a minute, now.
That argument stems from the narrative that she's an idiot and doesn't know what she's doing.
What if she's settling a score with somebody?
What if Romney's got somebody on his team that has been very scornful of her?
Who knows, I don't know.
But I do know she's not stupid, and I do know that she is highly competitive,
and I do know that she's willing to go to the throat,
and I do know that she keeps score.
Because everybody in politics does.
And she's certainly in politics.
So all of this,
"Rush, you can't win, I mean 41% of Republican voters..."
I have never in my life put it to you this way.
I have never in my life seen the Democrat Party and its media operatives
spend so much time destroying somebody who didn't have a prayer anyway.
This woman is so stupid,
she's got the entire press corps chasing her bus all up and down the East Coast.

NPR yesterday grabbed their own historian about this Paul Revere mess, and it was clear that NPR,
I'm sure thought their historian was gonna just make it very apparent
that Sarah Palin was an idiot, didn't know what she was doing.
This expert did an Ollie North on the Iran-Contra committee, ended up telling the hostette at NPR, (paraphrasing)
"Yeah, she was very right about everything she said."
And the NPR babe was obviously a little deflated and depressed here.

But these Republican operatives don't want her in the race
not because they fear she can't beat Obama
but because they fear she can beat their favored candidates and Obama,
which would leave them on the outside looking in.

And again, for whatever it's worth,
the Margaret Thatcher that I knew would in no way,
even if she thought it,
in no way would she say it or allow an aide of hers
to describe Sarah Palin or anybody else in the American political system,
a former governor, a former vice president, as nuts.
She doesn't even talk about her opponents that way.
She never did.
So even across the pond people working for Margaret Thatcher or speaking for her
have gotta get in their digs at Sarah Palin.
And again, I don't know that Margaret Thatcher would support her or not;
this is not the point here,
and the fact that she won't meet with Palin, she's not meeting with anybody.

Frankly, folks, she's not capable,
and it's very sad that she's not capable of meeting with a whole lot of people.
The people she meets with are very close, and that's it.
Just the ways of life.
But she's not making an active decision not to meet with Sarah Palin because she's nuts.
And I wouldn't even rule out the meeting anyway.
Palin is gonna go to London, she's gonna be there, I don't know when, on her way to the Sudan.
I don't know what she's going there for.
I have no clue.
Palin's not my candidate, don't misunderstand any of this,
but I read this stuff and I have to comment on it
'cause it's absolute BS. It is lies, it's distortion.
We've all been personally impacted, affected by this kind of crap,
and it never ends, unless somebody tries to put a stop to it.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Grab audio sound bites 30, 31, 32.
We've got the NPR sound bites that I was describing to you earlier.
On All Things Considered Monday it was funny.
They had their historian in there,
and I'm sure they thought that the historian was gonna come in there and rip Sarah Palin a new one
and it turned out to be just the opposite.
Monday night NPR's All Things Considered, the cohost was Melissa Block.
She's talking to Suffolk University's History Department Chairman Robert Allison about Palin
and, blah, blah, blah. Block said,
"Let's review Paul Revere's midnight ride, April 18, 1775.
He's going to Lexington.
According to Sarah Palin, he's riding his horse through town sending warning shots and ringing those bells.
Is that right?"


ALLISON: He is telling people so that they can ring bells to alert others.
What he's doing is going from house to house knocking on doors to members of the Committee of Safety saying,
"The regulars are out."
That is he knew that General Gage was sending troops out to Lexington and Concord -- really Concord
-- to seize the weapons being stockpiled there but also, perhaps,
to arrest John Hancock and Samuel Adams,
leaders of the Continental Congress who were staying in the town of Lexington.
Church bells are ringing throughout the countryside.
He also was a bell ringer,
that is he rang the bells at Old North Church as a boy,
but he personally is not getting off his horse and going to ring bells.
He's telling other people --
and this is their system. Before Facebook, before Twitter, before NPR,
this is the way you get a message out --


BLOCK: (haughty chuckle)

ALLISON: -- is by having people ring church bells
and everyone knows there is an emergency.

RUSH: "So Sarah Palin was saying that Paul Revere's message to the British and his warning was,
'You're not gonna take American arms,'
basically a Second Amendment argument
even though the Second Amendment didn't exist then?"


BLOCK: The Second Amendment didn't exist yet.

ALLISON: Yes, he was making a Second Amendment case but, in fact,
the British were going out to Concord to seize colonists' arms,
the weapons that the Massachusetts Provincial Congress was stockpiling there.
So, yeah, she is right in that.
She may be pushing it too far to say this is a Second Amendment case.
Of course neither the Second Amendment nor the Constitution was in anyone's mind at the time.
But the British objective was to get the arms that were stock mild in Concord.

RUSH: She never said it was a "Second Amendment case." She never used those words.
She just talked about the Paul Revere warning the Brits,
"You're not gonna get our arms. We're ready for you,"
and so the hostette says,
"So you think basically on the whole Sarah Palin got her history right in this?"


ALLISON: Well, yeah, she did --
and, remember, she is a politician, she's not an historian;
and God help us when historians start to act like politicians
and I suppose when politicians start writing history.

RUSH: Well, I don't know what that means,
"God help us when historians start to act like politicians,"
but regardless, yeah, yeah, she did.
She got it right. Yeah. She did. She got it right.
Do you think that was NPR's purpose?
I don't know.
I kinda doubt that it was NPR's purpose.

END TRANSCRIPT

Read the Background Material...


• Politico: Poll: Sarah Palin Leads, but Mitt Romney Best vs. Barack Obama

• NYDN: Margaret Thatcher Won't Meet with Sarah Palin During Her Trip to London, En Route to Sudan: Report

• NPR: Palin Gets Her Revolutionary History Right - Robert Allison


*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.

---

Yeah, the LAME STREAM MEDIA ... AND the Republican Crony Establishment .... are scared to death of Sarah Palin!
Thanks Rush and Sarah Palin.
God Bless and Keep you both.

[Do Be]

Blah, blah, blah. Another clueless expert.

You are blind to political reality. As they say, "Have eyes but cannot see."

[TEXOKIE]

I’m reluctant to back a call for destruction of private property.

[pyx]

Jeff;

I think it's very important for people to sift through all of Sarah's emails written while she was Gov. of Alaska for several reasons including ;

1.) These email will get people to discuss the details of the relationship Sarah Palin had when she was involved with a radical terrorist and his wife who were active in the 1960's.
2.) It will be finally be discovered and discussed that Sarah Palin attended a racist church for over 20 years with a blatant racist preacher who spoke every Sunday while Sarah Palin and her family sat in the front pews.
3.)These emails may finally reveal that one of the articles Sarah Palin wrote while she was the editor of a Law Review will finally be found.
4.)These emails will finally reveal that Sarah Palin's own father, Chuck R. Heath was not born in Hope, Idaho but instead was actually thrown out of the country.

... err ... maybe not ... n'er mind.

[PGalt]

GO SARAH GO!

GO SARAH GO! Good to see you, Jeff!

[TBP]

The media is angry with Sarah because she’s a feminist’s dream, but she’s conservative.

Sarah schooled them and embarrassed them in the Paul Revere thing (which resembles the way Christine O’Donnell was smeared and lied about over the First Amendment) and Politico just flat-out lied about Sarah and got caught at it, so now it’s payback time.

[philman_36]

Them wascally MSM people! Don't they know that you use a long fuse on a petard?

[hattend]

5. Write us an opinion piece disguised as an actual news story and we’ll run with it.

[Wyoming Cowboy]

Blah blah blah... Do you feel like a good little puppet now, after posting that drivel? Newsflash: I don’t care about Republicans. I care about conservatives. And I unconditionally support Sarah Palin - one hundred percent, no exceptions. I hope that fact makes you wallow just a wee bit more in your misery as you sit there in your basement trying to come up with your next round of concern trolling. Good luck.

[Freedom_Is_Not_Free]

The fact that Sarah Palin cannot win the general election...

You make a compelling, detailed, well thought out, expertly documented case that Sarah Palin is unelectable. I lack even the remotist statistic against your perfectly crafted argument. All I have is the indisputable fact that twice-elected, wildly popular President Reagan was equally documented to be "unelectable" before he dominated his two Democratic presidential opponents and embarrassed his naysaying detractors, as stated below.

______________________________________________________________________________

"Pundits stated continually that Reagan could not win and the polls for the most part were agreeing with the pundits as all the way up until election day Reagan lagged behind in most polling. In fact on election day itself in 1980 almost no one believed Ronald Reagan would beat Jimmy Carter and that Carter would be elected to a second term despite the shape of the economy and the general feeling that things were going the wrong direction in the country.

"But the people did not agree with the pundits or the GOP country club establishment and Ronald Reagan won in one of the greatest landslides in American history. Defeating Carter by more than eight million votes taking 44 states including Rockefeller’s New York and all of the Northeast states except Delaware, Maryland and Rhode Island and taking California in the process. He not only bucked and proved the GOP establishment wrong but his conservative message was embraced by voters and he continued to carry that voter loyalty into an even larger landslide in 1984 against Walter Mondale who was Carter’s Vice President.

Click here for the article comparing Reagan's unelectability to Palin's.

I do hope you are as fabulously, stupendously, catastrophically, embarrassingly wrong about Palin's unelectability as all of the other know-nothing pundits were about Reagan. Not that I am not calling YOU a know-nothing, of course, only the know-nothing wrong Reagan pundits. I just hope you are stupendously embarrassingly wrong. I guess we'll see.

[Jeff Head]

The Tea Party is making things turn...and that is us...and inspired by God IMHO...right works together like that.

[Jeff Head]

Back in Reagan’s day the left, the MSM, the DNC and even the establishment rino GOP trotted out all sorts of polls like that...and he ended up winning in a ladnslide...twice. If Sarah gets in, I believe she will do the same. What’s more, I believe they know it, it’s another reason why they fight her so.

[Jeff Head]

Now, for all of the stated Republican opposition to Sarah Palin, if she gets in the race, and you heard it here first, and don't doubt me, she is going to end up being the one to beat.

Rush is spot on in this. It is so obvious that the libs, left, MSM and DNC are afraid of her...as are the Rinos and establishment types.

And well they should. If she wins, they will be on the outside looking in, but will not be aallowed inside as she goes about restoring America with all the Tea Partyy patriots who atre ushered into office.

Image a conservative President, House, Senate...state houses, governors, etc...all with the WILL TO ACT and set things right. I long to see it!

[Jeff Head]

LOL! Exactly...a wonderful way to make that point and get those truths out.

[Palladin]

I am 100% behind Sarah Palin, and I am sure she is going to run.

We need her now, not in 2016 or later. Four more years of Marxist hell in D.C. will destroy our country.

Go, Sarah, Go!

Strike while the iron is hot!

[meadsjn]

Here are two awesome radio interviews with Stephen Bannon about the Sarah Palin documentary:

Monica Crowley Interviews Stephen Bannon about "The Undefeated"

Rita Crosby Interviews Stephen Bannon about his Palin film, "The Undefeated"

Here are two awesome radio interviews with Stephen Bannon about the Sarah Palin documentary:

Monica Crowley Interviews Stephen Bannon about "The Undefeated"

Rita Crosby Interviews Stephen Bannon about his Palin film, "The Undefeated"

[meadsjn]

You've been posting that fabricated crap poll for several months. Have you gone out and talked to thousands of people to get their opinions of Sarah Palin? Probably not.

I have. And you and your crap polls are wrong.