Posted on 12/14/2010 4:20:36 PM PST by NYer
BRUSSELS, December 14, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A homosexual daycare worker has been accused of molesting dozens of children in his charge. He and his male “spouse” are also accused of possession of child pornography generated from the abuse, which was reportedly distributed internationally through internet pedophile networks.
“Robert M.,” as he is identified by police, is a 27-year-old Lithuanian who reportedly moved to the Netherlands in 2004 and “married” his homosexual partner, a Dutch citizen, in 2008, receiving his own Dutch citizenship as a result.
He worked in at least two Dutch daycare centers from 2007 to 2010, and offered his services privately over the internet, claiming he was a “trained and experienced” babysitter. Police say they are continuing to investigate M’s contacts with children, which also extended to a stint as a volunteer in an African orphanage. The estimated tally of victims currently stands at 53.
Also under arrest is M’s homosexual “husband,” 37-year-old “Richard Van O,” who was reportedly found with child pornography in his possession. The couple was reportedly in the process of adopting a child.
you are so right!! I don;t have any kids, but I know I would NEVER put them in Daycare OR a Public School...NEVER!!
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
In order to have a just and peaceful society, child molesters and child porn users (not that there is any material difference) need to be executed. And homosexual acts should be illegal, as they were throughout most of the history of our country. Same sex acts are a crime against nature, and that is what they used to be called.
those two statements are two of the most inane and naive things I have ever heard. A stranger obviously cannot take better care of your child than you can.....but they can certainly provide loving, nurturing, care for your child, and most do. I simply don't understand the statement that the person would never trust a man in a day care setting.........what the hell does that mean??? Men are half the parents in the world and men love children everybit as much as do women. While, in a child's life, they may perform different functions, their love of the child has nothing at all to do with their gender......pathetic statement
The "married" crap is nothing but way of sugarcoating what it is essentially a piece of S***T. And like excrement, they are even affected by the stench of it, so they desperately look for the rest of us to "approve" their lifestyle... desperately want to be "purified" of what it must be an awful feeling inside their souls.
Now, I don't mind them if they stay away from me (The Military for instance)... The problem is that is not good anymore for them, now they want to ram it down our throats, whether we like it or not!
Back when homosexuality was rightly diagnosed as a mental illness,
this wouldn’t have happened.
The third law of homosexuality:
Any expsoure of children to homosexual behavior is child abuse
"I, personally, would NEVER EVER TRUST a MAN in a DAYCARE CENTER!! *** I just would not trust a daycare center with the care of my precious child. How can a stranger care for a child better than his parents?"
those two statements are two of the most inane and naive things I have ever heard. A stranger obviously cannot take better care of your child than you can.....but they can certainly provide loving, nurturing, care for your child, and most do. I simply don't understand the statement that the person would never trust a man in a day care setting.........what the hell does that mean??? Men are half the parents in the world and men love children everybit as much as do women. While, in a child's life, they may perform different functions, their love of the child has nothing at all to do with their gender......pathetic statement
Statement 1. Never trust a man in a daycare center. Child care is not a traditional male role. It doesn't pay well and requires a much more "nurturing" persona than the vast majority of men possess and the ones who do possess that sort of emotional makeup are much more likely to be "homosexual". And since all "homosexuals" are child molestors, it's far safer to never trust a man in a day care center.
Fathers have a far different relationship to their children than mothers do. I love my daughter more than life itself, But I cannot be a mother to her (Even though I am widowered and have to see both roles fulfilled). As a man I do not have the correct emotional make-up to fulfill those needs in her life.
This is why both a mother and a father are critical to the proper development of a child. A mother cannot fulfill the father's role and the father cannot fulfill the mother's role. While their love of the child has nothing to do with their sex (people don't have genders they have sexes) the mode of delivery (the 'type' as it were) of that love is almost completely different. Men and women are not interchangeable.
Statement 2. "How can a stranger care for a child better than his parents?". Assuming a normal parent (not insane, drugged up or liberal) the parent is ALWAYS the best caregiver to the child. The child always longs for the parent's love and attention (even if the parent is a drugged-up, insane, liberal). Normally the parent is willing to die to protect their child. A hired worker will not.
In a day care the child is just one face among many. At home the child is a precious member of the family.
While for some a day care is essential, for many people day care is just a place to store their kids while they live their own lives. Being a parent is the absolute most important job there is. It deserves full time attention, especially during the pre-school years
Anybody that knows anything about the homosexual lifestyle beyond what is marketed by hollywood writers knows that pedophilia is a major part of the behavior. There are no limits to what these freaks won’t do for personal gratification.
NPR ran this story and “overlooked” the fact that the pervs were also queers. Imagine that.
Dutch Arrest Suspected Serial Child Molester
by The Associated Press
Enlarge Associated Press
Exterior view of daycare center het Hofnarretje in Amsterdam, Sunday Dec. 12, 2010, where a man suspected of abusing preschool children was employed. Parents of dozens of preschool children in Amsterdam have been warned their children may have been abused by a baby sitter in one of the worst sexual abuse cases to come to light in the Netherlands. Authorities say a 27-year-old suspect was arrested after a tip from U.S. authorities about child pornography. The man’s computers have been seized and he has confessed to dozens of sex crimes at two Amsterdam daycare centers over the past 18 months, police chief Herman Bolhaar said at a press conference Sunday.
The 27-year-old suspect in the Amsterdam case worked as a substitute teacher for at least two preschools in the city and also offered baby-sitting services online in what is feared to be one of the worst cases of sexual abuse in the Netherlands, the city’s mayor said at a late-night press conference Sunday.
Bit, but I thought it was because the priests were celibate — this giu (not a priest) was married?
Sarcasm off//////
I can only speak for the opinion that I expressed:
Yes, I am sure there are some daycare providers who do a wonderful job, but, ultimately, a child belongs with his own mother or father. There is important bonding that goes on between a parent and a child who is caring for him. It makes no sense to pay someone to “bond: with your child. I have seen far too many of these daycare-raised children, and it is very sad.
there is no doubt that parental involvement is critical for kids, but think of the extraordinary number, in this day and age, of single mothers, broken families, welfare babies etc. etc. etc....beyond all that, you will send your child off to school at age 5 or so and then they are actually being nurtured by someone else.....The vast majority come out of this situation just fine.....some better than others, but overall pretty good. We have three sons, graduates of 2 state universities, one Catholic university, who are more conservative than Ronald Reagan. The influence of their family overcame the liberal nonsense that they were inundated with in school.. You can't babysit your kids forever....you raise them to the best of your ability and then send them out into the big bad world to fend for themselves.....if you did a good job, they will reward your efforts over and over again and you will FEEL FULFILLED...guaranteed!!!
Yes, one’s children are usually sent off to the care of others when they are old enough to go to school. At that point, however, the child has reached a different phase in his development. Those pre-school years are crucial in his socialization, which is best nurtured by his own mother. I did not mean to imply that a child cared for by paid strangers will not be successful in school and in business; his emotional development is the focus of my concern in this area.
Yes, there are examples of mothers who have no choice but to pay strangers to care for their children, but the vast majority of children in daycare are there because mommy wants to be “fulfilled” or the family cannot live without those brand new cars or fancy vaciations or a mcmansion. Being a full-time mother is the hardest job in the world, but it is also the most important job in the world.
All I would have to do is walk into a day care center and see one man working and I would turn around right back out the door.
I say that over and over on here. Eventually, they are going to have to go...out there.
what a very sad and pathetic statement that was....talk about condemning a half of the world population as child molesters.... like saying I would never vote for a female seeking public office.....obviously they are never qualified to hold office......does that make sense to you????? on the other hand, having Nancy Pelosi in office may make me rethink my position.....oh well
what a very sad and pathetic statement that was....talk about condemning a half of the world population as child molesters.... like saying I would never vote for a female seeking public office.....obviously they are never qualified to hold office......does that make sense to you????? on the other hand, having Nancy Pelosi in office may make me rethink my position.....oh well
I only pushed the button once, I have no idea why I double posted.....honest
Perhaps, but it’s a mirror of us. My kids? And I am going to gamble on just why a grown man wants to be around small children all day? Too big of a gamble for me to take. Thankfully, my kids are past that age and never saw the inside of a day care center.
he wants to be around your kids because he runs a day care center.....a VERY profitable day care center.....male doctors are pediatricians, ob/gyns...whatever there is....are they there to molest little children?????of course not, they are there because they went to school to learn thier trade and it PAYS VERY WELL...why on earth would you go through life worrying that all men are after your children???????pathetic
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.