Posted on 11/11/2009 9:29:38 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
A salamander allegedly “18 million years old” is the latest fossil to produce astonishingly well preserved soft tissue. This time, it’s muscle tissue, and it is supposedly the most pristine example yet.
Background—the “dinosaur connection”...
(Excerpt) Read more at creation.com ...
Now that theme song will be in my head all afternoon.
Yabba Dabba Doo!
You don’t make me mad. You amuse me. That is why I hope for new articles instead of retreads. I’m not a fan of sit-com reruns.
In case the length or the big words in the abstract from my previous post causes you problems, the operative sentence is as follows:
“Here, we report fossilized musculature from an approximately 18 Myr old salamander...”
Lying, even if it is spread your version of the Word, won´t endear you to God.
"Bone marrow in ca. 10 Ma frogs and salamanders from the Miocene of Libros, Spain, represents the first fossilized example of this extremely decay-prone tissue. The bone marrow, preserved in three dimensions as an organic residue, retains the original texture and red and yellow color of hematopoietic and fatty marrow, respectively; moldic osteoclasts and vascular structures are also present."
http://geology.gsapubs.org/content/34/8/641.abstract
See my last. You have got your head deeply buried in the sand as per usual.
“the first fossilized example of this extremely decay-prone tissue. “
“fossilized” Seems pretty clear from your own example.
You need to be careful about what they are calling fossils these days. For instance, take a look at the following description of a T rex. “fossil”:
“ In modern bone, removing the minerals leaves supple, soft organic materials that are much easier to work with in a lab. In contrast, fossilized bone is believed to be completely mineralized, meaning no organics are present. Attempting to dissolve the minerals from a piece of fossilized bone, so the theory goes, would merely dissolve the entire fossil. But the team was surprised by what actually happened when they removed the minerals from the T. rex femur fragment. The removal process left behind stretchy bone matrix material that, when examined microscopically, seemed to show blood vessels, osteocytes, or bone building cells, and other recognizable organic features.”
Yeah, you’re right. You are starting to irk me. But your threads are usually good for a laugh or two.
“But it’s your dinosaur, Jack”, she said.
From your own post:
“represents the first FOSSILIZED example of this extremely decay-prone tissue”
LMAO. Give it GGG, this is getting embarrasing.
Word to the wise: While you may prevail by basing your arguments upon fact, you may lose by being banned, as a science based worldview is somewhat heretical hereabouts.
No I never in a million years have ever been to this website... 99% of the FReepers are not literal-creationist, only the most vocal along with the anti-pitbull, and confused socialis-liberal.
>>Darwinists are anti-creation not pro-science. Evidence means nothing to them in the slightest, especially if it shows that creationists line of thinking appears to be more accurate.<<
There is no such thing as a “Darwinist.” There are those who understand science and attribute the early genesis of what is now The Theory of Evolution to Darwin. Just as there are no “Copernicists” nor “Einsteinists” nor “Curieists.”
As far as creationism having “evidence” — when you introduce me to the corporeal ID and it (or He) tells us how to use what it does every single time in a definable and predictable way, you have just theology.
Your understanding of science is based in the depths of your apologetics and Luddite folklore, not on the actual practice.
Yeah, but what if you're Jewish?
Hey, just like the last n times this same story has been posted, I am waiting for the link between this finding and a 6 day universe origin (see how nice I was not so say a 6,000 YO Universe?).
“This time, it’s muscle tissue”
Mmmmm .... tastes like chicken.
Why don’t you post a link to this article in the thread about the other article about the exact same thing?
Do you get paid by the thread by these creat spam merchants?
Your spamming of FR and calling of names is a factor in the Freepathons getting longer and longer.
If it´s really me that you meant to post to you´ll be waiting a loooong time.
The last time I said that, GGG dedicated a new thread to me!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.