Posted on 08/11/2004 9:00:52 PM PDT by Lando Lincoln
America is, in some ways, a very great and good nation. Good people, good land, good opportunities. Its not a perfect place, but this is Earth not Heaven, so the best we can do is to strive for a more perfect union. In many ways we get there, at least in comparison with other nations.
However, there are some things that boggle the mind. Presidential elections are one of them.
And were coming up on another one in less than three months. Oh, itll seem far longer than that, I assure you. Claims, counter-claims, lies, damned lies, statistics, slander, libel, election fraud, vote buying and thats just the lib/dem/soc/commies.
But what do you do when one of your candidates shouldnt even be a candidate in the first place?
Such is the case we have today.
John Forbes Kerry aka Hanoi John, JFK-lite, Lurch, Botox-boy, etc. is the nominee for the lib/dem/soc/commies. He has an ADA liberal rating of 90%, which puts him to the left of ALL of his Senate brethren. Not virtually all, just ALL. Hes more liberal than Teddy ''Dont Worry, Mary-Jo, Ill Drive'' Kennedy. Hes more liberal than Hillary ''Of Course, Im A Lesbian, Youve Seen My Husband Havent You?'' Clinton. Hes probably even more liberal than Josef ''I Love the Smell of Pogroms in the Morning'' Stalin.
Nevertheless, hes the lib/dem/soc/commies choice as candidate.
Hes also something else. Hes a self-confessed war criminal.
In 1971, Lieutenant Junior-Grade went before a Senate committee investigating the Vietnam War. The war it wanted desperately to lose (at least, those lib/dem/soc/commies in Congress). Lt. JG. Kerry said the following about the ''witnesses'' of the Winter Soldier investigation
....personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam in addition to the normal ravage of war....
Previous to this, he made the following statement on Meet the Press"
''There are all kinds of atrocities, and I would have to say that, yes, yes, I committed the same kind of atrocities as thousands of other soldiers have committed in that I took part in shootings in free fire zones . I conducted harassment and interdiction fire. I used 50 calibre machine guns, which we were granted and ordered to use, which were our only weapon against people. I took part in search and destroy missions, in the burning of villages.''
Based on this information you have only two choices. First, that Kerry was telling the truth, in which case he is a war criminal. Second, that Kerry lied under oath about the ''atrocities'' of Vietnam, in which case he is a perjurer.
Question: Why would anybody want either type of person in the Oval Office in the first place?
Lets examine what would happen if Kerry were (God Forbid!) elected president. Assuming he told the truth and he is a war criminal, that would mean that he would come under the aegis of the International Criminal Court. Since the leaders of nations are not exempt from its jurisdiction (see also: Milosevic, Slobodan) he could, theoretically, be indicted and arraigned for war crimes. Im unaware of any statute of limitations on war crimes, so even 30+ years after the fact, wed be in the unenviable position of having a leader of the free world standing in the dock while charge after charge was filed.
How about if Kerry lied? What would the effect be there? Well, itd be similar to the effect of the Clinton years after he perjured himself. Here we would have the chief law enforcement officer of the nation in the position of someone who perverted the course of justice by lying under oath. Granted it wouldnt be the same as lying under oath while in office, but nobody in the lib/dem/soc/commie side could ever argue that it was ''only about sex'' or that it ''didnt matter.''
What brought us to this place? How did our country become so jaded, so morally degraded, to allow someone in power whose resume includes a choice of war criminal or perjurer? It would be easy to blame the persons who committed the crime, and blame them we should. But perhaps we should also blame those who allowed them to come to power.
J. Michael Straczynski, one of my favorite writers, posited an important set of thoughts in his career as a television writer and creator. As a Sci-Fi fan, its understandable to see how a futuristic setting allows a writer to speak on current events without the fear of censorship. Here is part of an exchange he used in ''The Exercise of Vital Powers'' episode of Babylon 5, which speaks loudly of todays situation:
Edgars: How many people actually belonged to the Nazi Party, the Communist Party, the Jihad Party? A very small number. But there were always plenty of other people who were happy to do the work for them, and others afraid enough to let it happen.
Garibaldi: In order for them to take power, theyd need an army.
Edgars: Youre still laboring under the notion that people take power. Nobody takes power. Theyre given power by the rest of us. Because were stupid or afraid or both.
When you consider what the DNC is selling lies, half-truths, divisions and racism disguised as ''compassion,'' it makes us understand that weve gotten the government we deserve over the past six decades. However, its not solely their fault. The lib/dem/soc/commies have lied to us, true. Nevertheless, we, as a nation, have accepted those lies as the normal course of politics. Weve accepted the divisions and racism and slander and fraud as ''business as usual.'' Weve accepted political and moral corruption, and worse, weve voted for it because it sounded ''pretty'' or ''reasonable'' instead of accepting the hard and painful truths that would allow us to grow and prosper as a nation.
John Forbes Kerry is not fit for the presidency. Hes not fit for the Senate. Hes not fit for any public office. Dont accept the spin anymore, folks. Dont accept the lie. Dont settle for less because you think its the best you can get. Its not. You deserve better than Kerry. So does America.
About the Writer: Doc Farmer is a writer and humorist who is also a moderator on ChronWatch's Forum. He formerly lived in Saudi Arabia and Qatar, but now resides in Indiana. Doc receives e-mail at docfarmer9999@yahoo.co.uk.
Lando
What I don't understand is why kerry wasn't court marshalled when he joined vets against the war he was still in the service wasn't he????
Senator Teddy Kennedy
Forgive my ignorance but what can you tell me about "Chron Watch"?
Clearly, a substantial portion of the country is comfortable with a president committing perjury, so there is precedent.
I sense a boldness arising from the Noble Shephards.
In this case and at this time it appears to be once again those that serve with honor who will protect us all.
The sheep will not stop bleating but God help us all if the Shephards toss in the towel.
FRegards
But what do you do when one of your candidates shouldnt even be a candidate in the first place?
These days.................. PUNT!
Terrific post!
can Kerry be censured (or better) for his now obvious Perjury
on the SENATE FLOOR?
Lando
Lando
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.