Firs time caller, long time listener. I need some helpful insight and advice, Mister Owl.
How'd you get your head that far up your butt?
I'd like to avoid your mistakes.
I'll hang up and take your answer off the air.
Posted on 10/25/2021 10:07:23 AM PDT by ransomnote
I can answer that. NO. The CDC's data is so fake if laughable, and so are you.
Maybe it does maybe it doesn't.
That's the best you can do? Damning information posted about CDC and you're trying to make it sound like facts don't matter? Maybe? Or maybe not?
No causal connection claimed by the paper. It implies the jab gives you longer life, but it’s a study in correlation. More CDC propaganda.
The only mention that sounds like a cause is in references 7 and 8 which are > 10 year old similar studies about the flu shot. Ie the distinction is between the behavior or life circumstances of those who CHOOSE jab/no-jab, not a medical effect of the jab. Correlation not causation.
Of course. I'm here offering helpful insight and advice to anyone who needs it.
mRNA is not even a "vax", so I wouldn't be pro-vax even if I was in favor of it.
But I am against clickbait lies like this dumb article.
„Vaccidents“= vaccine induced (car) accidents
https://lichtnahrung2015.wordpress.com/2021/05/02/vaccidents-vaccine-induced-car-accidents/
Firs time caller, long time listener. I need some helpful insight and advice, Mister Owl.
How'd you get your head that far up your butt?
I'd like to avoid your mistakes.
I'll hang up and take your answer off the air.
That is just hideous. No other word can describe it. Absolutely hideous.
Alright.
Fauci boy it is.
-PJ
Uhm. No. But thanks for playing.
I'm not making it sound like facts don't matter. In fact I believe facts do matter, that's why I highlighted the clickbait lie that is this article.
As to the CDC data I literally don't know if it makes sense or not. That's it. I don't know. I haven't seen the underlying data so I don't know. Why does that matter to you? Make your own judgement. You don't need to rely on me.
But as to the author's misstatement of the the CDC's conclusion, I have all the facts I need. I read the CDC's conclusion and I read the author's lie about what the CDC said and I can see it's a lie. If it's not a lie, fly to Japan and instantly lower your risk of heart disease.
Cute emoji.
And here’s a little challenge for you: try to explain why my conclusion that this article is a lie is false.
I’ll wait.
And then fly to Japan and as soon as you get off the plane your risk of heart disease will drop 50%, and remain that low until you come back to the U.S.
The date range for this data set is Dec. 14 through July 31. A lot of people were unvaccinated until around March and a number of younger people still unvaccinated until May.
I’d like to see this chart broken down month.
I think that would be really interesting.
'Clickbait' seems to be the new majic word to make facts disappear in the twinkling of an eye.
This new vax troll is a one trick 'clickbait' pony. Everything's clickbait, therefore nothing is true. Which leaves us only with the Witch Doctor Fauci's 'truth.
As to the CDC data I literally don't know if it makes sense or not.
Then why are you opening your Fauci look-a-like contest winner's yap?
If it's not a lie, fly to Japan and instantly lower your risk of heart disease.
Flying to Japan is not the same as pumping poison into your body.
#FailedAnalogy
Dear Mister Geek,
Behavior and life circumstances may have affected chosing to be vaccinated for the flu in the past. In fact, I can see that connection.
But these are not normal times or normal circumstances. People are being forced to take the 'jab' by a combination of fear propaganda, peer pressure, governmment and workplace coercion these days.
So your theory is dooky.
If you are vaccinated but nevertheless die - of anything - then it must be because you aren't really vaccinated.
Regards,
Since you are so wise, please point me to the part in the CD report where it says that your mortality risk "drops by 72% after you get vaccinated" as opposed to the possibility that people who choose to get vaccinated might be more healthy to begin with.
I'll wait.
I believe the CDC is certainly implying mortality “drops” when you get the jab when they say “lower rates of mortality” without explaining the cause (because they don’t know the cause). They believe the study confirms the safety profile of the jab.
The cohort left out of the study (since this is humans and not beagles) are those from the vaccinated population who unknowingly got a placebo instead. IOW their life circumstances and behavior match the vaccinated group.
The mortality could be better, could be worse. It’s unknown based on this study.
If the mRNA cures accidents and other poor life choices or circumstances, the CDC should own it and promote it on that basis.
Also, what about long term side effects since the jab has been out < 1 year and vaccines are typically tested > 5 years before approval?
Also, what if mass vaccination of healthy people actually favors covid variants that prolong the pandemic and kill more people?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.