Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SiGeek
The only mention that sounds like a cause is in references 7 and 8 which are > 10 year old similar studies about the flu shot. Ie the distinction is between the behavior or life circumstances of those who CHOOSE jab/no-jab, not a medical effect of the jab. Correlation not causation.

Dear Mister Geek,

Behavior and life circumstances may have affected chosing to be vaccinated for the flu in the past. In fact, I can see that connection.

But these are not normal times or normal circumstances. People are being forced to take the 'jab' by a combination of fear propaganda, peer pressure, governmment and workplace coercion these days.

So your theory is dooky.


95 posted on 10/25/2021 11:21:06 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: bagster

Jab is still a choice. No one is being held down and jabbed yet. The time period of the study (in the title) ends July 31 before the medical tyranny really started.

Yes these are not normal times. Have you seen one ad for the vaccine that lists the side effects like “normal” drug ads? How many jabbed people do you know that did it because they thought it would confer immunity and make life go back to normal? The opposite of informed consent for an experimental medical procedure. Definitely abnormal.


107 posted on 10/25/2021 11:54:41 AM PDT by SiGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson