No causal connection claimed by the paper. It implies the jab gives you longer life, but it’s a study in correlation. More CDC propaganda.
The only mention that sounds like a cause is in references 7 and 8 which are > 10 year old similar studies about the flu shot. Ie the distinction is between the behavior or life circumstances of those who CHOOSE jab/no-jab, not a medical effect of the jab. Correlation not causation.
Dear Mister Geek,
Behavior and life circumstances may have affected chosing to be vaccinated for the flu in the past. In fact, I can see that connection.
But these are not normal times or normal circumstances. People are being forced to take the 'jab' by a combination of fear propaganda, peer pressure, governmment and workplace coercion these days.
So your theory is dooky.
