Posted on 01/26/2018 4:33:23 PM PST by Swordmaker
Jan 26 2018 15:43:27
Q !UW.yye1fxo 62
Read slowly and carefully.
Will become critically important in coming weeks.
Continue to track those who are resigning across all platforms.
Where there was once darkness, there will now be LIGHT.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-blocking-property-persons-involved-serious-human-rights-abuse-corruption/
Q
Sleeping with the fishes and with their tongues cut out as a warning to others.
List of notable resignations from 9/1/17 through today:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1B-95giwldeKgsd0nYiw_sEaSf4kGNLZgEIvEhL2mVAw/edit#gid=0
(A) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse;
(B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:
So, for the property seizures to occur a state of emergency must be declared by Trump?
If this is really going down, the state of the union is at critical mass. Could SHTF on Tues. night during the Address?
:)
I had same thought.
He reads FISA abuse memo as law enforcement begins hauling them in.
They’re all in one room.
Makes sense to me.
stageman=showman
There are a lot of applications here, but this stands out:
(B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:
(1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or
(2) the transfer or the facilitation of the transfer of the proceeds of corruption;
(C) to be or have been a leader or official of:
(1) an entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section relating to the leader’s or official’s tenure; or...”
The State department lost a lot of money in the 8 years in the Obama Clinton years. The Clinton Foundation, Fraud in Haiti? Where does the Obama get his walking about change? How much left the treasury and went to the DNC? Then there are the Arwans and DWuzzS of the DNC.
So far, no one has picked up on the Sex Fund. My calculations say that there should be approximately 100 more names to be revealed. So far, about 25 Rs and 7 Ds have said they aren’t running, mostly for “family reasons” (usually code for a scandal).
I think most of these people have been blackmailed and that they were assured their names wouldn’t be revealed in the Fund if they quietly left.
That means that, percentage wise, there should be about 65 or so Dems yet to be outed, and about 35 or so more Rs. Some of these will be women.
In the Senate, if the same proportions hold, about 19 more are involved in some sort of harassment. Two have paid out (unknown who). Frankenberry is gone. So there are likely 19 more names, of which half will be Ds.
This should give the Rs an advantage over the summer as a disproportionate number of Ds in the House have to leave or have their sex habits revealed.
LS said today he thinks the reason they are holding onto the memo is because of the destruction it will do to the FBI and how that will effect past corrupt cases, like Clinton, Fast n Furious, Benghazi, etc. They would have to reinvestigate it all...
As walls close in on FBI, the bureau lashes out at its antagonists!
BY SHARYL ATTKISSON, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR — 01/25/18 01:50 PM EST
There are two overarching issues.
First, there’s the alleged improper use of politically-funded opposition research to justify secret warrants to spy on U.S. citizens for political purposes.
Second, if corruption is ultimately identified at high levels in our intel agencies, it would necessitate a re-examination of every case and issue the officials touched over the past decade — or two — under administrations of both parties.
This is why I think the concerns transcend typical party politics.
It touches everybody. It’s potentially monumental.
This week, the FBI said it was unfair for the House Intelligence Committee not to provide its memo outlining alleged FBI abuses. The committee wrote the summary memo after reviewing classified government documents in the Trump-Russia probe.
Excerpted. For full story go to the link below:
On the day the EO was issued there was a corresponding release shortly thereafter published on Dept. of Treasury web site. Nearly all of the names were quickly shown to have ties to ... the Clinton Foundation ;)
You’re the only place I’ve ever heard “sex fund”, ?
Okay, I just had a thought. Do you think this only applies to non American citizens? After all, citizens have legal due process and Constitutional rights. I’m thinking an executive order wouldn’t cover citizens. It would require judicial review and legislation.
This guy is arrested now
I really don’t know why you have to read it slow...it seems very straight forward. No cryptic stuff at all.
The Donald declared a national emergency with the signing of the executive order.
and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat.
He could begin the seizures any minute now. Maybe he has.
Q wants us to think.
Does this EO only apply to foriegners? I can't figure that one out and I can't read any slower.
p.s. Thanks for the emails, goodman.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.