[LS]

So far, no one has picked up on the Sex Fund. My calculations say that there should be approximately 100 more names to be revealed. So far, about 25 Rs and 7 Ds have said they aren’t running, mostly for “family reasons” (usually code for a scandal).

I think most of these people have been blackmailed and that they were assured their names wouldn’t be revealed in the Fund if they quietly left.

That means that, percentage wise, there should be about 65 or so Dems yet to be outed, and about 35 or so more Rs. Some of these will be women.

In the Senate, if the same proportions hold, about 19 more are involved in some sort of harassment. Two have paid out (unknown who). Frankenberry is gone. So there are likely 19 more names, of which half will be Ds.

This should give the Rs an advantage over the summer as a disproportionate number of Ds in the House have to leave or have their sex habits revealed.

[txhurl]

You’re the only place I’ve ever heard “sex fund”, ?

[bagster]

Hey Ls.

Does this EO only apply to foriegners? I can't figure that one out and I can't read any slower.

p.s. Thanks for the emails, goodman.

[Swordmaker]

So far, no one has picked up on the Sex Fund. My calculations say that there should be approximately 100 more names to be revealed. So far, about 25 Rs and 7 Ds have said they aren’t running, mostly for “family reasons” (usually code for a scandal).

I think most of these people have been blackmailed and that they were assured their names wouldn’t be revealed in the Fund if they quietly left.

I believe Q said to look for those who were announcing not running, that they were being allowed to do so in exchange for not being indicted. . . including both Ds and Rs of the RINO persuasion.