Posted on 11/19/2016 3:48:15 PM PST by Admiral_Zeon
In 2014 the whole increased to 129 million, and last year gave Norway record $174 million. This year cut the support with over four-fifths. Next year it is only allocated 23 million dollars, a decline of 87 percent since the scant top year.
"Norway has signed several deals in which the goal was to help reduce maternal and child mortality in the countries with high dødelighetsbyrde to ensure progress on the Millennium development goals. Most of the agreements expired in 2015, in parallel with the work on the Millennium development goals was ended. This is the reason why the payments were particularly high in 2014 and 2015, "writes Communications Advisor Guri Solberg in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in an e-mail to the ledger newspaper.
(Excerpt) Read more at microsofttranslator.com ...
This answers a lot of questions as to why support for Hillary over in European nations was so pronounced.
demand a refund and an accounting....
“”This is a translated article.””
From what to what? None of it made any sense..
Tons of been paid to her she has no way of making good on her promises She is in a world of hurt
Summary: The b*tch can’t graft and corrupt for us any longer, so let’s keep our money for more successful grifters.
"...to help reduce maternal and child mortality..."
I think they meant to say reduce maternal and child morality
Norway has better ways to use their money to accomplish their goal of getting all the Jews in Israel exterminated.
Wonder why it’s not reduced by 100%?
Does Norway think Hillary will invite it to a cocktail party?
If true, should be 100 percent. Don’t Norwegians know about throwing away money?
Yeah. That's why.
No such thing as coincidence. These reductions are smart thinking.
From Norwegian to English via Auto-Translate so it’s going to be spotty. I wanted the original source to be linked.
“I think they meant to say reduce maternal and child morality”
There goes the connection with the CF and children again.
>>> demand a refund and an accounting....
If Clinton Foundation donors were the MOB, they would have already broken her and Bill’s legs and sold Chelsea off into the sex trade
Quite a coinkidink! HA!
Maybe they’re trying to keep on the good side of the Clinton’s on the off chance that Chelsea gets into Congress. That’s the only reason I can think of for an 87% reduction, instead of 100%.
Not a coincidence at all. Not at all. Nope.
ML/NJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.