Posted on 07/10/2015 3:48:22 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
Chelsea Clinton has “secretly undergone a DNA test,” and it looks like former President Bill Clinton might not be her biological father.
That’s according to a National Enquirer report released Thursday, which says that Hillary’s former law partner Webb Hubble might be the father.
An exhaustive investigation by The National Enquirer obtained “touch DNA” samples from both Chelsea and Webb Hubbell, samples that were turned over to a nationally recognized laboratory that specializes in paternity testing.Keep in mind, it’s the National Enquirer, and all they are saying is that there is a “possibility” that Bill Clinton is not Chelsea’s biological father.A lab official confirmed that finding “does not discount the possibility” that Webb could be Chelsea’s biological dad!
(But, to their credit, TNE did break the John Edwards cheating scandal and was considered for a Pulitzer prize for it.)
This isn’t a new theory, however. It’s actually a rumor that National Enquirer reported on almost exactly a year ago, and others have postulated for years before that.
That June 30, 2014 report claimed that former Clinton aide Larry Nichols said that Bill had admitted that Hubble was indeed the father of Chelsea.
You can also do a quick Google search of “Chelsea Clinton Webster Hubble” and come across some interesting image comparisons that have been out there for a while.
Will this have any effect on Hillary’s campaign? Just like the DNA test, maybe or maybe not.
Also, just throwing this out there, perhaps Bill was simply talking about Hillary when he said “he did not have sexual relations with that woman”? Alright, probably not.
How is this news? We’ve known about this for years.
Even Stevie Wonder could see the resemblance.
Thats funny
This is about as shocking as saying Shepherd Smith might not be heterosexual.
Shazam!
National Enquirer is somewhat reliable when the subject is someone who may sue (carol Burnett sued Nat Enq years ago & won a lot of $$$). They also were right about John Edwards’ love child. Still, I wonder about this reporting on Chelsea, though.
Nonsense. A DNA test would have much more specific results.
It further marginalizes Hillary as a human being and a truthful person and a role model. Most women are not *luts who accept this kind of behavior. It will break a lot of her women's vote. So yeah, it just might be a big deal.
Everyone knows it’s Huckster Webbel.
This will help Hillary, which is why they are allowing it to go public.
Every woman out there who had slept around and/or been cheated on by her husband will relate to her.
And most importantly, they need something to titillate the tabloids to distract from something else that is much more damaging.
they need something to titillate the tabloids to distract from something else that is much more damaging.
,,,Betty Davis eyes.....and Hubble lips...
It is one of the most wicked things to do to any person, denying them the knowledge of who their parents are.
Sorry, don’t buy it. She has similar baboon features in her face that he has. BUT, maybe Hillary isn’t her mother? Does the spawn of satan have her mother’s kankles? Just sayin. ;^)
+1.
if true which pictures seem to confirm I am sure Chelsea was informed long ago unless Hilary was such a slut she or Bill didn’t know for sure but kinda had an idea especially with those lips..Gesh is Hubble ugly.....Hilary is such a loser
The Enquirer sustains itself on sensational stories. It's why the paper exists.
This paper makes mistakes. In the sensational world that's inevitable.
These people are infinitely more reliable than the New York Times or any other of our major news outlets. By comparison you have NBC and CBS who don't have any reporters on staff. They only employ fantasy writers. Their anchor people aren't even news readers. They are narrators.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.