Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: afraidfortherepublic
How is this news? We’ve known about this for years.
Even Stevie Wonder could see the resemblance.
2 posted on
07/10/2015 3:51:20 AM PDT by
Fresh Wind
(Falcon 105)
To: afraidfortherepublic
4 posted on
07/10/2015 3:52:53 AM PDT by
Old Sarge
(Its the Sixties all over again, but with crappy music...)
To: afraidfortherepublic
This is about as shocking as saying Shepherd Smith might not be heterosexual.
5 posted on
07/10/2015 3:53:15 AM PDT by
rhinohunter
(Freepers aren't booing -- they're yelling "Cruuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuz")
To: afraidfortherepublic
"What difference does it make?"
To: afraidfortherepublic
7 posted on
07/10/2015 3:56:24 AM PDT by
Flag_This
(You can't spell "treason" without the "O".)
To: afraidfortherepublic
National Enquirer is somewhat reliable when the subject is someone who may sue (carol Burnett sued Nat Enq years ago & won a lot of $$$). They also were right about John Edwards’ love child. Still, I wonder about this reporting on Chelsea, though.
8 posted on
07/10/2015 3:56:33 AM PDT by
PghBaldy
(12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
To: afraidfortherepublic
A lab official confirmed that finding “does not discount the possibility” that Webb could be Chelsea’s biological dad! Nonsense. A DNA test would have much more specific results.
9 posted on
07/10/2015 3:57:51 AM PDT by
iowamark
(I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy)
To: afraidfortherepublic
Everyone knows it’s Huckster Webbel.
11 posted on
07/10/2015 3:58:55 AM PDT by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
To: afraidfortherepublic
This will help Hillary, which is why they are allowing it to go public.
Every woman out there who had slept around and/or been cheated on by her husband will relate to her.
And most importantly, they need something to titillate the tabloids to distract from something else that is much more damaging.
12 posted on
07/10/2015 3:59:00 AM PDT by
Fresh Wind
(Falcon 105)
To: afraidfortherepublic
14 posted on
07/10/2015 4:05:04 AM PDT by
WKB
To: afraidfortherepublic
,,,Betty Davis eyes.....and Hubble lips...
To: afraidfortherepublic
I truly feel sorry for any person (Democrat or Republican) who has this fraud put upon them.
It is one of the most wicked things to do to any person, denying them the knowledge of who their parents are.
16 posted on
07/10/2015 4:08:13 AM PDT by
dbehsman
(Attention liberals and liberaltarians, Judgment Day is coming. You've earned it!)
To: afraidfortherepublic
Sorry, don’t buy it. She has similar baboon features in her face that he has. BUT, maybe Hillary isn’t her mother? Does the spawn of satan have her mother’s kankles? Just sayin. ;^)
To: afraidfortherepublic
Keep in mind, it’s the National Enquirer, and all they are saying is that there is a “possibility” that Bill Clinton is not Chelsea’s biological father. The Enquirer sustains itself on sensational stories. It's why the paper exists.
This paper makes mistakes. In the sensational world that's inevitable.
These people are infinitely more reliable than the New York Times or any other of our major news outlets. By comparison you have NBC and CBS who don't have any reporters on staff. They only employ fantasy writers. Their anchor people aren't even news readers. They are narrators.
20 posted on
07/10/2015 4:14:37 AM PDT by
stevem
To: afraidfortherepublic
21 posted on
07/10/2015 4:16:27 AM PDT by
kinsman redeemer
(The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
To: afraidfortherepublic
My bet is this is being brought out so as to make Hillary more of a ‘victim’. The man-hating feminazi’s will eat this stuff up.
It feeds right into their ‘Yeah, all men are lying, cheating, animals’ world view. Poor Hillary...
She’s got nothing to lose and stands to gain at least some sympathy votes.
22 posted on
07/10/2015 4:18:52 AM PDT by
Paulie
(America without Christianity is like a Chemistry book without the periodic table.)
To: afraidfortherepublic
They are both ugly in the same way.
25 posted on
07/10/2015 4:29:47 AM PDT by
samtheman
(Trump/Cruz '16)
To: afraidfortherepublic
No way. She looks too much like a mixture of both of them.
26 posted on
07/10/2015 4:32:10 AM PDT by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: afraidfortherepublic
31 posted on
07/10/2015 4:40:42 AM PDT by
struggle
To: afraidfortherepublic
Old trash about white trash. Y-a-w-n.
I thought “Chelsea Clinton is the love child of Janet Reno and Hillary Clinton” [McCain]
33 posted on
07/10/2015 4:43:08 AM PDT by
Daffynition
("We Are Not Descended From Fearful Men")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
