To: afraidfortherepublic
A lab official confirmed that finding “does not discount the possibility” that Webb could be Chelsea’s biological dad! Nonsense. A DNA test would have much more specific results.
9 posted on
07/10/2015 3:57:51 AM PDT by
iowamark
(I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy)
To: iowamark
Hillary’s people are just dangling the possibility out there.
To: iowamark
Depends on the quality of the DNA obtained. If it’s a poor sample you get a less predictive result.
46 posted on
07/10/2015 4:59:18 AM PDT by
Kozak
(Walker / Cruz 2016 or Cruz/ Walker 2016 Either one is good...)
To: iowamark
Maybe because it was a “touch” DNA test? What ever the heck that is.
66 posted on
07/10/2015 6:00:34 AM PDT by
Jane Long
("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson