Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roger Ailes and Murdock Supressing Obama Eligibility Story (Vanity)..And Elvis and JFK ZOT!!!
trust me, I know (Vanity) | JackofHearts

Posted on 02/26/2009 1:15:06 PM PST by jackofhearts

I have it on impeccable authority but cannot disclose my source within the Fox Network. Rest assured that Roger Ailes and Rupert Murdock are sitting on the Obama eligibility/birth certficate story. Everyone else wants to jump all over it, including Sean Hannity.

I say storm the Ailes/Murdock fax machine/email servers--let them know (politely) we need this issue thoroughly.

Maybe someone has the email/fax numbers?


TOPICS: Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: barackobama; barry; berg; bho2008; bho2009; bho44; birthcertificate; birthers; british; certifigate; citizenship; colb; constitution; corruption; coverup; crime; democrats; democratscandals; eligibility; hawaii; ineligible; kenya; murdoch; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamaeligibility; obamanoncitizenissue; orly; orlytaitz; passports; taitz; troofer2; truthers; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-319 next last
To: nathanbedford

It could be that the PTBs just consider it just another conspiracy theory like 9/11 truthers (not saying it is, just their mindset). It has hit some news, just doesn’t give a lot of attention. Even this week I saw a five second blurb on Fox mentioning the suit, but not the hour upon hour they give some lost kid de’jour.


41 posted on 02/26/2009 1:43:18 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
Obama would have to be impeached at this point.

I disagree, he is not eligible, therefore he not the POTUS and the election becomes void. Impeachment is not even necessary.

42 posted on 02/26/2009 1:43:51 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (FUBO, he says we should listen to our enemies, but not to Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Obama is as phony as those Kennedy dollars with his picture pasted on them.


43 posted on 02/26/2009 1:44:11 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
All good points!

But I would ultimately agree with your point that the Constitution must be upheld at all costs, but it appears Murdoch and the Democratic Party (suprise!) has a backbone to uphold the Constitution over their company or party principles.

If that is indeed true, then we are all in big trouble, for the power has passed away from the people.

44 posted on 02/26/2009 1:44:20 PM PST by NorCoGOP (Recession: friend loses his job. Depression: You lose your job. Recovery: Obama loses his job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP

Not if SCOTUS simply throws out the election results. He was never eligible for the Office he was running for.


45 posted on 02/26/2009 1:44:39 PM PST by Danae (Amerikan Unity My Ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bert

I intended to change my tag line and forgot.

I’ll remedy that


46 posted on 02/26/2009 1:45:37 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . John Galt hell !...... where is Francisco dÂ’Anconia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: bert

I intended to change my tag line and forgot.

I’ll remedy that


47 posted on 02/26/2009 1:46:21 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . John Galt hell !...... where is Francisco dÂ’Anconia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jackofhearts

The Drive-By Media; Obama has never and will never, in our eyes, do anything wrong.


48 posted on 02/26/2009 1:47:20 PM PST by wolfcreek (There is no 2 party system only arrogant Pols and their handlers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Do you get paid to piss on and interupt threads on this issue?


49 posted on 02/26/2009 1:48:15 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (FUBO, he says we should listen to our enemies, but not to Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron
Since he was inaugurated (installed) as holding the Office, even I must (after swallowing the bile) admit he officially holds the office.

The only way to change that is for the House to impeach him (snowballs in hell stand a better chance of survival), and the Senate to try him.

If the Senate concludes, like many people believe, he indeed is NOT a natural born citizen, THEN, and only then, regrettable, could he be removed from the office he is currently disgracing.

That would be upholding the Constitution, as the framers' intended it.

I just wish enough elected official had the backbone to put Constitution over party. They don't.

However, like my tagline, I hope for recovery!

50 posted on 02/26/2009 1:48:22 PM PST by NorCoGOP (Recession: friend loses his job. Depression: You lose your job. Recovery: Obama loses his job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP

LOL...

See post #38 — and then post #45... :-)


51 posted on 02/26/2009 1:48:40 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP

The other thinking on this is since Obama is an Usurper, he never really was a legitimate president under the Constitutional making every action under the Obama administration invalid.

The Supreme Court could find Obama an Usurper, making him only a figure head without power of the office if Obama choose not to step down, To remove him then the final push would be most likely be impeachment and conviction.


52 posted on 02/26/2009 1:50:06 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Danae
That's not the SCOTUS purview.

The chief justice of the SCOTUS is involved, as the presiding officer, in an impeachment trial, anyways.

If the SCOTUS were to review this, I'd bet they'd refer the issue to the Congress to investigate anyway.

Unfortunately, it'd die a quick death with the current makeup.

53 posted on 02/26/2009 1:50:26 PM PST by NorCoGOP (Recession: friend loses his job. Depression: You lose your job. Recovery: Obama loses his job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

You said — “Do you get paid to piss on and interupt threads on this issue?”

LOL... how come I get picked on... look for the term API and see how many others are posting on it... :-)

This “super secret source” (sort of like super secret sauce, I guess...) is typical of the *hoax sites*....

But, no..., I just post when I see *deranged opinions* — like the Obama Derangement Syndrome and other similar “tin foil conspiracy theories”...

Free Republic used to be based on facts and the Constitution, but now there is a significant segment that is based upon tin foil conspiracy theories and “violating the constitution in order to save it”...


54 posted on 02/26/2009 1:52:25 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
Unfortunately, it'd die a quick death with the current makeup.

If Congress choose that route, they would befell a quick death in 2010. The drumbeat to remove Obama would be overwhelming. Congressional rats vs. Obama presidentency?

The Rats in Congress would throw him under the bus.

55 posted on 02/26/2009 1:54:08 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP

Yep, they’re “coming out of the woodwork” right now... the crowd who is willing to “violate the Constitution in order to save it...”

Post #52...


56 posted on 02/26/2009 1:54:17 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
even I must (after swallowing the bile) admit he officially holds the office.

I have to give you credit, I haven't gotten that far yet without hurling chunks.

But as a usurper, he committed fraud along with the other enablers who no doubt number many, just seems to me he never was POTUS even though he was installed by an unknowing electorate.

I dunno, should would be interesting to watch though, not to mention a God send.

57 posted on 02/26/2009 1:56:48 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (FUBO, he says we should listen to our enemies, but not to Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Then find out from your source what evidence they are sitting on and produce it here. Get it out in public somehow.

I'll say it again and again.

The game is not providing evidence, the game is providing innuendo. Put Obama on the defensive. We don't have to prove anything to do that, we just have to put the question out there.

That's the Democrat playbook. That's the MSM playbook. That should be our playbook, too.

Proof comes later. Accusations and innuendos come now. Don't hold up on spreading the perceptions because you're not sure you can seal the deal with proof.

Taint Obama's legitimacy with the appearance of irregularity. Smoke him out. Let him either show the proof or continue to live under the cloud of suspicion, but either way, don't hold back.

You know they wouldn't if the roles were reversed.

-PJ

58 posted on 02/26/2009 1:56:55 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (You can never overestimate the Democrats' ability to overplay their hand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Say hi to Axelrod and crew for me. LoL!


59 posted on 02/26/2009 1:58:09 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
Murdoch definitely. Rupert always plays to the winning hand and now Obama's holding that hand. I know a lot of folks here never liked O'Reilly, but he's mellowed out so much in the last six months that he makes McCain look rabidly partisan.

I know people will say he hired Beck, but Beck often goes so far around the bend that he makes conservatives look like survivalists. While Beck may play to his own audience he's not going to attract many others. He is entertaining and that will make Rupert happy. Also Murdoch has many cross media connections in places like NYC and Boston. He doesn't want Obama's FCC Nazis coming after him.

60 posted on 02/26/2009 1:58:19 PM PST by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-319 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson