I'll say it again and again.
The game is not providing evidence, the game is providing innuendo. Put Obama on the defensive. We don't have to prove anything to do that, we just have to put the question out there.
That's the Democrat playbook. That's the MSM playbook. That should be our playbook, too.
Proof comes later. Accusations and innuendos come now. Don't hold up on spreading the perceptions because you're not sure you can seal the deal with proof.
Taint Obama's legitimacy with the appearance of irregularity. Smoke him out. Let him either show the proof or continue to live under the cloud of suspicion, but either way, don't hold back.
You know they wouldn't if the roles were reversed.
-PJ
You said — “The game is not providing evidence, the game is providing innuendo. Put Obama on the defensive. We don’t have to prove anything to do that, we just have to put the question out there.”
THERE YOU GO..., that pretty much explains what the “Obama Derangement Syndrom” people (here on Free Republic) are doing. You said it — “providing innuendo” — and that’s all.
It’s no wonder they can’t get a court in the land to “do anything” — and, of course, this “proves” that the court system is corrupt, too... LOL...
This story has been around for at least nine months. So far the only defensive Obama has been put on is having his lawyers submit briefs that have gotten every case that's gotten to a judge dismissed. Meanwhile, the birthers are busy attacking each other.
And how's that working for you?
All to often innuendo is another name for BS. Obama can fight innuendo. He can fight rumor. He can't fight fact or solid evidence or real proof. If you or anyone else has anything solid then they need to present it and get it out there in public view. Otherwise you're case is no better or worse than his is.
You know they wouldn't if the roles were reversed.
I kind of like to think we're better than they are.