BH02 Stand In
From anonymous | 12/18/2015 12:21:57 PM PST read
This is a video of, supposedly resident 0bama, giving a speech.
He isn*t 0bama, no way, no how. If you look at old photos from early 2013 it is obvious.
Thanks, anonymous.
Posted on 07/03/2008 4:35:19 PM PDT by SE Mom
Jay McKinnon, a self-described Department of Homeland Security-trained document specialist, has implicated himself in the production of fraudulent Hawaii birth certificate images similar to the one endorsed as genuine by the Barack Obama campaign, and appearing on the same blog entry where the supposedly authentic document appears.
The evidence of forgery and manipulation of images of official documents, triggered by Israel Insider's revelation of the collection of Hawaii birth certificate images on the Photobucket site and the detective work of independent investigative journalists and imaging professionals in the three weeks since the publication of the images, implicate the Daily Kos, an extreme left blog site, and the Obama campaign, in misleading the public with official-looking but manipulated document images of doubtful provenance.
The perceived unreliability of the image has provoked petitions and widespread demands for Obama to submit for objective inspection the paper versions of the "birth certificate" he claimed in his book Dreams from My Father was in his possession, as well as the paper version of the Certificate of Live Birth for which the image on the Daily Kos and the Obama "Fight the Smears" website was supposedly generated.
Without a valid birth certificate, Obama cannot prove he fulfills the "natural born citizen" requirement of the Constitution, throwing into doubt his eligibility to run for President.
McKinnon, who says he is 25-30 years old, operates a website called OpenDNA.com and uses the OpenDNA screen name on various web sites and blogs, including his comments and diary on The Daily Kos. In recent years he has divided his time between Long Beach, California and Vancouver, British Columbia. He is a Democratic political activist, frequent contributor to the left wing Daily Kos blog, and a fervent Barack Obama supporter.
(Excerpt) Read more at web.israelinsider.com ...
You have posted tons of good stuff on these threads, more than I could ever keep up with. Have you ever summarized it all? Will there be a book so I can digest it all?
No book. I wasted too much time on this as it is. Whenever I tried to explain the results of our research (there were nine of us, the majority wanted to remain anonymous)a team of obots and detractors would swoop like vultures.
Mind you, I rarely posted a comment without posting an image and/or a source, unlike many others who throw their theories at the wall to see what might stick. Unfortunately, stick it does. The water has been so muddied it’s futile.
And I’ve got my life back...
Shame that. It seems you have a good working theory of all this history. Sorting through all the noise has made these threads hard to sort out.
Anyhow, thanks for all of it because your stuff is all well sourced, such as it can be.
FReegards!
BH02 Stand In
From anonymous | 12/18/2015 12:21:57 PM PST read
This is a video of, supposedly resident 0bama, giving a speech.
He isn*t 0bama, no way, no how. If you look at old photos from early 2013 it is obvious.
Thanks, anonymous.
Check out this comment:
Justice_099 on December 18, 2015 at 1:51 am
Would I be considered crazy to start suspecting that he is sending signals to them with these speeches?
It seems every time he has one of these speeches, a major attack happens somewhere within days.
I certainly know that I am not the only one thinking things like this. Normal, sane, intelligent, everyday people I encounter throughout my workday have been intimating the same suggestion privately that O is a Muslim and may not be on our side.
If Obama told me that water is wet, I wouldn't believe him.
Sundance adds this note about the speech:
My hunch is: The timing of this speech and the release of the criminal complaint are not coincidental. The speech took place at 12:58 to 1:10pm EST. The Criminal Complaint was released around 6:00-7:00pm EST.
Just a hunch, but the people actually on the ground, doing the legwork inside the CA investigation, may have sent a specific message of warning with the construct of the terrorist criminal complaint - READ HERE (and below)
https://www.scribd.com/doc/293571213/Marquez-Complaint-Charging-Document-12-17
This is a pretty good summary of what I read SO FAR of the document above.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/18/us/san-bernardino-enrique-marquez-charges-justice-department.html
Obama delivers “marching orders” or communicates with groups in his speeches
Does Obama speak in Code? You decide.
http://www.blogster.com/joannemor/does-obama-speak-in-code-you-decide-1
Added: Monday, September 27th 2010 at 12:51pm by JoAnneMor
Recently the team and I came across a discovery that was hidden in plain sight.
In the course of a conversation, Obama’s speech patterns came up.
We noticed he put emphasis on certain words.
Snip
The next day, Obama gave his recent speech to the UN. It was in the course of writing the words that we discovered there was a speech hidden within the speech.
We poured over more speeches and were shocked at how easily we could see what we had been missing all along.
“Hiding in plain sight”!
continue reading - there are a few examples listed.
http://www.blogster.com/joannemor/does-obama-speak-in-code-you-decide-1
From the comments: Monday September 27th 2010
We were on Vicky Nissen’s “blogtalkradio show last night.
Discussed this subject.
If you would like to listen to the podcast, please go to
http://bit.ly/bFoaIV
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/vickynissen/2010/09/27/does-obama-speak-in-code-to-the-global-world
“...The speech took place at 12:58 to 1:10pm EST. The Criminal Complaint was released around 6:00-7:00pm EST. Just a hunch, but the people actually on the ground, doing the legwork inside the CA investigation, may have sent a specific message of warning with the construct of the terrorist criminal complaint...”
If the complaint was a warning, then wouldn’t it have been put out there first?
Ping to a continuing thread, 9K posts and still kicking.
If the complaint was a warning, then wouldn’t it have been put out there first?
***********
Below is the earlier post from Sundance
Jaw Dropping Federal Complaint ; Actual Charging Document Against San Bernardino Co-Conspirator (pdf)
The sense of it is the FBI-DOJ people who wrote this complaint are trying to send a signal to the rest of America- around a Presidential office hell bent on avoiding reality and downplaying the content. You’ve just got to read it.
Complaint below:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/293571213
This is a pretty good summary of what I read SO FAR of the document above.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/18/us/san-bernardino-enrique-marquez-charges-justice-department.html
Thanks for the updated info!
O was lying about his place of birth back when, and is lying now about the threat to our country.
Good on the investigators for doing that report!
Ancestry of Barack Hussein Obama up to Muhammed Ibn Abd Allah Al-Mustafa Banu Hachim
o Generation 1
> 1 - Barack Hussein Obama 1961-
o Generation 2
> 3 - Stanley Ann Dunham 1942-1995
o Generation 3
> 6 - Stanley Armour Dunham 1918-1992
> 7 - Madelyn Lee Payne 1922-2008
o Generation 4
> 12 - Ralph Waldo Emerson Dunham 1894-1970
> 13 - Ruth Lucille Armour 1900-1926
> 14 - Rolla Charles Payne 1892-1968
o Generation 5
> 24 - Jacob William Dunham 1863-1936
> 26 - Harry Ellington Armour 1874-1953
> 27 - Gabriella Clark 1876-1966
> 28 - Charles Thomas Payne 1861-1940
o Generation 6
> 48 - Jacob Mackey Dunham 1824-1907
> 53 - Nancy Ann Childress 1848-1924
> 55 - Susan C. Overall 1849-/1920
> 56 - Benjamin Payne 1839-1878
o Generation 7
> 96 - Jacob Dunham 1795-1865
> 107 - Nancy Conyers Childers 1823-1860
> 110 - George Washington Overall 1820-1871
> 113 - Harriet Bowles 1806-1857
o Generation 8
> 192 - Samuel Dunham 1742-1824
> 215 - Sarah Ann Landrum 1800-1850
> 221 - Annie Browning 1780-1820/
> 226 - David Jesse Bowles 1776-1823
o Generation 9
> 384 - Jonathan Dunham
> 385 - Mary Smith 1717-1791
> 431 - Mary Collins 1776-1820
> 442 - James Browning ca 1745-ca 1812
> 443 - Susannah Hickman ca 1745-/1833
> 453 - Hannah Perkins ca 1756-
o Generation 10
> 769 - Mary Rolfe 1682-
> 770 - Shubael Smith
> 771 - Prudence FitzRandolph 1696-1766
> 862 - Edward Collins 1729-1818
> 884 - John Browning 1728-1803
> 886 - James Hickman
> 887 - Hannah Lewis 1722-1822
> 906 - Stephen Perkins 1717-1772
o Generation 11
> 1,538 - John Rolfe 1634-1681
> 1,541 - Elizabeth Pierce 1665-
> 1,542 - Samuel FitzRandolph 1668-1754
> 1,725 - Susannah Lewis 1692-1768
> 1,769 - Elizabeth Lloyd
> 1,772 - Edwin Hickman 1689-1769
> 1,775 - Anne Terrell 1687-1734
> 1,812 - Constantine Perkins 1682-1767
o Generation 12
> 3,077 - Honour Rolfe 1593-1650
> 3,082 - Daniel Pierce
> 3,084 - Nathaniel FitzRandolph 1642-1713
> 3,450 - Zachary Lewis 1673-1719
> 3,538 - Sampson Lloyd
> 3,545 - Martha Thacker 1667-
> 3,550 - William Richmond Terrell 1659-1743
> 3,624 - Nicholas Perkins 1647-1711
o Generation 13
> 6,154 - Richard Rolfe 1567-1598
> 6,164 - Anthony Pierce 1611-1678
> 6,168 - Edward FitzRandolph /1607-1684..1685
> 6,900 - John Lewis 1635-1689
> 7,076 - Charles Lloyd 1637-1698
> 7,091 - Eltonhead Conway ca 1646-1689
> 7,100 - Richmond Terrell 1624-ca 1680
> 7,248 - Nicholas Perkins ca 1614-/1656
> 7,249 - Mary Burton ca 1618-ca 1669
o Generation 14
> 12,309 - Elizabeth Saunders
> 12,328 - John Pierce 1588-1661
> 12,336 - Edward FitzRandolph ca 1565-1647
> 12,337 - Frances Howe ca 1585-1631
> 13,800 - Robert Lewis 1607-1645
> 14,152 - Charles Lloyd 1613-
> 14,182 - Edwin Conway, Col. ca 1610-
> 14,183 - Martha Eltonhead 1618-
> 14,200 - Robert Reading Terrell, Sir ca 1594-1643
> 14,496 - Arthur Perkins 1582-1633
> 14,498 - John Burton 1580-1674
o Generation 15
> 24,618 - Thomas Saunders 1520-1543
> 24,656 - Richard Pearce ca 1540-
> 24,672 - Christopher FitzRandolph ca 1530-1588
> 24,675 - Anne Welles 1564-1602
> 27,601 - Sarah Pennington 1591-
> 28,305 - Catherine Lloyd Wynne 1583-1636
> 28,364 - Edward Conway 1564-
> 28,365 - Dorothy Ann Tracy 1563-
> 28,366 - Richard Eltonhead
> 28,400 - William Tyrrell 1565-1595
> 28,992 - Richard Perkins 1541-1603
> 28,996 - Francis Burton ca 1560-1630
o Generation 16
> 49,236 - Richard Saunders ca 1487-1524
> 49,312 - Richard Pearce ca 1510-
> 49,345 - Jane Langton ca 1499-1573
> 49,350 - Robert Welles 1540-1617
> 55,202 - Joseph Pennington 1573-1641
> 56,610 - Humphrey Lloyd Wynne 1550-1571
> 56,729 - Eleanor Helen Greville ca 1539-
> 56,730 - John Tracy, Sir ca 1544-1591
> 56,731 - Anne Throckmorton ca 1546-1581
> 56,732 - William Eltonhead 1550-
> 56,800 - George Tyrrell ca 1530-1571
> 56,801 - Eleanor Elizabeth Montagu 1525..1530-
> 57,984 - Richard Perkins 1497-
> 57,992 - Edward Burton ca 1510-1558
o Generation 17
> 98,472 - William Saunders ca 1450-1530
> 98,624 - Richard Pearce ca 1478-
> 98,691 - Jane de Southworth ca 1478-
> 98,700 - Thomas Welles 1504-1558
> 110,404 - William Pennington 1532-1573
> 110,405 - Bridget Huddleston 1526-1597
> 113,221 - Margaret Kynaston ca 1515-
> 113,459 - Elizabeth Willoughby 1512-1562
> 113,461 - Elizabeth Brydges ca 1515-1557/
> 113,463 - Margaret Whittington ca 1518-1578
> 113,465 - Jenet Gerard
> 113,600 - Humphrey Tyrrell ca 1500-
> 113,602 - Edward Montagu, Sir 1487-1566
> 115,968 - Richard Perkins ca 1470-
> 115,984 - John Burton 1473-1543
> 115,985 - Elizabeth Poyner ca 1485-
o Generation 18
> 196,945 - Joan Carew ca 1432-1472
> 197,248 - Peter Percy ca 1457-1485/
> 197,383 - Isabel de Dutton ca 1445-
> 197,400 - Robert Welles 1484-
> 220,809 - Frances Palgrave 1509-1565
> 220,810 - John Huddleston, Sir 1488..1489-1547
> 226,442 - Humphrey Kynaston ca 1474-1534
> 226,919 - Margaret Neville
> 226,923 - Elizabeth Grey ca 1492-1559
> 226,926 - Thomas Whittington 1482..1488-
> 226,931 - Maud Bold ca 1481-
> 227,200 - William Tyrrell, Sir 1465..1470-
> 227,204 - Thomas Montagu 1452-1517
> 231,936 - William Perkins, Lord ca 1430-1495
> 231,968 - Edward Burton 1442-1524
> 231,971 - Lucia Eyton 1467-
o Generation 19
> 393,891 - Margaret Fiennes ca 1414-1483
> 394,496 - Ralph de Percy 1425-1464
> 394,767 - Anne Touchet ca 1421-ca 1503
> 394,800 - John Welles 1450-
> 394,801 - Cecily Plantagenet
> 441,619 - Anne Glenham ca 1473-
> 441,621 - Joan Stapleton ca 1444-1519
> 452,885 - Elizabeth de Grey, Lady ca 1447-
> 453,838 - Richard Neville, Baron ca 1468-1530
> 453,846 - Edmund Grey 1469..1470-1511
> 453,847 - Florence Hastings ca 1473-1511/
> 453,853 - Elizabeth Croft 1462-1527
> 453,863 - Dulcia Savage ca 1448-1481
> 454,400 - Thomas Tyrrell, Sir 1440-/1490
> 454,408 - William Montagu ca 1425-
> 463,872 - Thomas Perkins, Lord ca 1410-ca 1478
> 463,937 - Christian Stapleton 1423-
> 463,942 - Hezekiah Eyton 1444-
o Generation 20
> 787,783 - Elizabeth de Holand ca 1386-1425
> 788,992 - Henry de Percy, Sir
> 788,993 - Eleanor de Neville, Countess ca 1401-1463..1472
> 789,535 - Margaret de Ros 1398-1423
> 789,600 - Lionel Welles, Sir 1406..1407-1461
> 789,602 - Edward Plantagenet, King 1442-1483
> 883,239 - Eleanor Brandon ca 1458-1480
> 883,242 - Miles Stapleton, Sir ca 1407-1466
> 905,770 - Henry de Grey 1419-
> 905,771 - Antigone Plantagenet 1428-1446
> 907,676 - Henry Neville, Sir 1437..1438-1469
> 907,677 - Joan Bourchier 1442..1446-1470
> 907,692 - John Grey, Lord ca 1441-1499
> 907,693 - Anne de Grey ca 1450-
> 907,694 - Ralph Hastings ca 1435-1495
> 907,707 - Eleanor Cornwall ca 1428-1513
> 907,727 - Katherine Stanley ca 1430-1498
> 908,801 - Anne Marney 1410..1412-
> 908,816 - John Montagu 1397-
> 927,744 - William Perkins ca 1380-ca 1451
> 927,874 - John Stapleton, Sir ca 1397-1455
> 927,885 - Katherine Talbot 1419-
o Generation 21
> 1,575,566 - John de Holand, Duke 1358..1360-
> 1,575,567 - Elizabeth Plantagenet 1362..1363-1425
> 1,577,984 - Henry de Percy, Sir 1364-1403
> 1,577,985 - Elizabeth de Mortimer
> 1,577,987 - Joan de Beaufort 1375..1379-1440
> 1,579,070 - William de Ros, Baron 1369-1414
> 1,579,071 - Margaret FitzAlan
> 1,579,200 - Eudo de Welles, Sir ca 1387-/1421
> 1,579,204 - Richard Plantagenet, Duke 1411-1460
> 1,579,205 - Cecily Neville
> 1,766,479 - Elizabeth Wingfield ca 1434-1497
> 1,766,485 - Cecilia Bardolf 1371-1432
> 1,811,540 - John de Grey, Sir 1384..1386-
> 1,811,541 - Joan de Cherleton ca 1399-1425
> 1,811,542 - Humphrey Plantagenet, Duke 1390-
> 1,815,352 - Edward George de Neville, Baron 1412-1469
> 1,815,353 - Elizabeth Beauchamp, Lady 1417-1448
> 1,815,354 - John Bourchier, Sir ca 1415-1474
> 1,815,384 - Reginald Grey 1412-1442
> 1,815,385 - Tacina Tudor ca 1425-1469/
> 1,815,386 - Edmond de Grey 1416-1490
> 1,815,387 - Katherine Percy 1427-ca 1499
> 1,815,389 - Alice Philipa Camoys ca 1400-1455
> 1,815,414 - Edmund Cornwall, Sir ca 1382-1435
> 1,815,415 - Elizabeth Barry ca 1412-1468
> 1,815,455 - Joan Goushill 1401-
> 1,817,602 - John Marney, Sir ca 1384-1471
> 1,817,632 - Thomas Montague
> 1,855,488 - John Perkins ca 1350-1400
> 1,855,748 - Miles de Stapleton, Sir ca 1345-
> 1,855,770 - John Talbot, Earl 1384..1390-1453
o Generation 22
> 3,151,133 - Joan Plantagenet 1328-1385
> 3,151,134 - John Plantagent of Gaunt, Duke 1340-
> 3,151,135 - Blanche Plantagenet 1345-1369
> 3,155,968 - Henry de Percy 1341-
> 3,155,971 - Philippa Plantagenet 1355-
> 3,158,141 - Beatrice de Stafford ca 1342-1415
> 3,158,142 - John FitzAlan 1347..1348-1379
> 3,158,401 - Margaret de Mowbray 1364-1444
> 3,158,408 - Richard Plantagenet, Earl 1385-1415
> 3,158,409 - Anne de Mortimer 1390-1411
> 3,532,958 - Robert Wingfield, Sir 1403-1454
> 3,532,959 - Elizabeth Goushill 1396..1401-1491
> 3,532,970 - William Bardolf, Lord 1349-
> 3,623,081 - Joan de Mowbray ca 1363-1402
> 3,623,082 - Edward de Cherleton, Sir ca 1371-
> 3,623,083 - Eleanor de Holand, Countess 1372..1373-1405
> 3,623,084 - Henry of Lancaster, King 1366-
> 3,623,085 - Mary de Bohun ca 1369-1394
> 3,630,707 - Elizabeth de Berkeley 1385..1386-1422
> 3,630,709 - Anne Plantagenet of Gloucester, Countess 1383-1438
> 3,630,768 - Richard Grey, Baron 1393-1442
> 3,630,771 - Katherine of France, Queen 1401-
> 3,630,772 - John de Grey, Sir 1387-1439
> 3,630,773 - Constance de Holand 1387-1437
> 3,630,828 - Richard Cornwall 1360-
> 3,630,831 - Alice Talbot 1387-
> 3,630,911 - Elizabeth D’Arundelle FitzAlan 1366-1425
> 3,635,205 - Elizabeth Cergwaux ca 1368-/1414
> 3,635,264 - Simon de Montagu 1353-
> 3,710,976 - Henry Perkins ca 1329-/1412
> 3,711,497 - Alice de St. Philibert ca 1320-/1383
> 3,711,540 - Richard Talbot, Baron 1361-1396
> 3,711,541 - Ankaret le Strange 1361-1413
o Generation 23
> 6,302,266 - Edmund of Woodstock, Earl of Kent 1301-
> 6,302,268 - Edward Plantagenet of England, King 1312-1377
> 6,302,269 - Philippa de Hainault 1311-1369
> 6,302,270 - Henry Plantagenet 1300-
> 6,311,937 - Mary Plantagenet 1320-1362
> 6,311,942 - Lionel Plantagenet, Prince 1338-1368
> 6,316,283 - Margaret de Audley ca 1318-1347
> 6,316,285 - Eleanor Plantagenet 1311-
> 6,316,802 - John de Mowbray, Baron 1340-ca 1368
> 6,316,803 - Elizabeth de Segrave 1338-1368
> 6,316,816 - Edmund Plantagenet, Prince 1341-1402
> 6,316,818 - Roger de Mortimer, Earl 1374-1398
> 7,065,916 - Robert Wingfield, Sir ca 1370-1409
> 7,065,941 - Elizabeth d’Amorie 1318-1362
> 7,246,165 - Joan de Stafford ca 1336-/1397
> 7,246,166 - Thomas de Holand, Sir 1348..1354-1397
> 7,246,167 - Alice FitzAlan 1348..1352-
> 7,246,171 - Joan FitzAlan ca 1345-1419
> 7,261,414 - Thomas de Berkeley, Lord
> 7,261,418 - Thomas Plantagenet of Woodstock, Duke
> 7,261,419 - Eleanor de Bohun ca 1366-1399
> 7,261,536 - Henry de Grey, Baron 1340-1396
> 7,261,537 - Elizabeth Talbot 1353-
> 7,261,542 - Charles of France, King 1368-1422
> 7,261,543 - Isabelle of Bavaria 1369-1435
> 7,261,545 - Margaret de Ros 1366..1368-/1414
> 7,261,656 - Geoffrey Cornwall, Sir 1335-1365
> 7,261,822 - Richard FitzAlan 1346-1397
> 7,261,823 - Elizabeth de Bohun ca 1350-1385
> 7,270,411 - Phillipa FitzAlan 1349..1352-1399
> 7,270,529 - Margaret Monthermer 1329-
> 7,421,952 - Pierre de Morlaix, Count ca 1300-1381/
> 7,422,995 - Ada de Botetourt ca 1295-1349
> 7,423,081 - Petronella Boteler 1332-1368
> 7,423,083 - Isabel FitzAlan ca 1332-1396
o Generation 24
> 12,604,532 - Edward Plantagenet of England, King 1239-1307
> 12,604,533 - Margaret of France, Queen 1279..1282-
> 12,604,536 - Edward Plantagenet of England, King 1284-1327
> 12,604,537 - Isabella Capet of France, Queen ca 1292-1358
> 12,604,539 - Johanna de Valois ca 1294-1352
> 12,604,540 - Henry Plantagenet 1281-1345
> 12,632,567 - Margaret de Clare 1292-1342
> 12,633,605 - Joan Plantagenet
> 12,633,607 - Margaret of Norfolk, Dutchess ca 1320-
> 14,131,833 - Margaret Hastings 1350-1397
> 14,131,883 - Elizabeth de Clare 1295-1360
> 14,522,829 - Elizabeth le Despencer 1322-1389
> 14,523,073 - Maud de la Vache 1315-1391
> 14,523,084 - Charles of France, King
> 14,523,085 - Jeanne de Bourbon, Queen
> 14,523,086 - Stephan von Wittlesbach, Duke 1337-1413
> 14,523,312 - Richard Cornwall 1311..1313-1343
> 14,523,646 - William de Bohun, Earl of Northampton ca 1312-1360
> 14,540,822 - Edmund FitzAlan, Sir 1327..1330-1377/
> 14,541,058 - Thomas Monthermer 1301-1340
> 14,843,904 - Pierre de Dreux, Count 1272-1341
> 14,845,990 - John de Botetourt, Lord Mendlesham 1266-1324
> 14,846,163 - Eleanor de Bohun 1304-1363
> 14,846,167 - Isabel Philippa le Despencer, Countess 1312-1356
o Generation 25
> 25,209,065 - Eleanor of Provence ca 1223-1291
> 25,209,066 - Philippe Capet, King 1245-1285
> 25,209,073 - Eleanor de Castile 1240-1290
> 25,209,074 - Phillip of France, King 1268-1314
> 25,209,078 - Charles de Valois, Count
> 25,209,079 - Marguerite of Anjou and Maine 1273..1274-1299
> 25,209,080 - Edmund Crouchback, Earl
> 25,265,135 - Joan of Acre, Princess 1272-1307
> 25,267,214 - Thomas of Norfolk, Marshal 1300-1338
> 28,263,667 - Ann le Despencer ca 1360-1426
> 29,045,659 - Eleanor de Clare 1292-1337
> 29,046,146 - John de Botetourt ca 1287-1339
> 29,046,168 - John of France, King 1319-1364
> 29,046,169 - Bonne of Luxemburg 1315-1349
> 29,046,170 - Peter de Bourbon, Duke 1311-1356
> 29,046,171 - Isabella de Valois 1313-1388
> 29,046,173 - Elisabeth de Aragon, Princess 1309-1349
> 29,046,624 - Geoffrey de Cornwall 1288-1335
> 29,047,293 - Elizabeth Plantagenet, Princess of England 1282-1316
> 29,687,808 - Jean de Dreux, Duke
> 29,687,809 - Beatrice of England 1242-1273
o Generation 26
> 50,418,130 - Ramon Berenguer ca 1198-1245
> 50,418,132 - Louis Capet, King 1215-1270
> 50,418,133 - Margaret Berenguer, Queen 1221-1295
> 50,418,146 - Ferdinand de Castile, King 1201-1252
> 50,418,149 - Isabella de Aragon, Princess 1243-
> 50,418,158 - Charles d’Anjou Sicilie 1248-1309
> 56,527,334 - Edward le Despencer, Lord
> 58,092,336 - Philip de Valois, King 1293-1350
> 58,092,337 - Jeanne of Burgundy, Queen 1294-1348
> 58,092,338 - John of Luxemburg, King 1296-1346
> 58,092,340 - Louis de Bourbon, Duke 1279-
> 58,092,346 - Frederico de Aragon, King 1272-1337
> 58,092,347 - Eleanora d’Anjou Sicilie, Princess 1289-1343
> 58,093,248 - Richard de Cornwall 1255-1296
> 59,375,617 - Blanche de Navarre, Princess ca 1226-1283
o Generation 27
> 100,836,260 - Alfons Berenguer 1180-1209
> 100,836,265 - Blanca Alphonsa de Castile, Princess
> 100,836,292 - Alfonso de Castile, King 1166-1230
> 100,836,293 - Berengeria de Castile
> 100,836,298 - Jaime Berengar, King
> 100,836,316 - Charles Stefan d’Anjou Sicilie 1226-1285
> 100,836,317 - Beatrice de Aragon 1234-1267
> 113,054,668 - Edward le Despencer 1310-1342
> 116,184,675 - Agnes of France 1260-1327
> 116,184,677 - Marguerite de Brabant, Queen 1276-1311
> 116,184,680 - Robert of France, Count 1256-
> 116,184,692 - Pedro Berengar, King 1239-1285
> 116,186,497 - Sanche Berenguer 1225-1261
> 118,751,234 - Theobald de Champagne, King 1201-1253
o Generation 28
> 201,672,521 - Sancha de Castile 1154-1208
> 201,672,530 - Alfonso de Castile, King 1155-1214
> 201,672,584 - Fernando de Castile 1135-
> 201,672,596 - Pedro Berengar 1174-1213
> 232,369,355 - Marguerite de Capet, Princess 1259-1317
> 237,502,469 - Blanca de Navarre ca 1177-
o Generation 29
> 403,345,042 - Alfonso de Langres, King
> 403,345,060 - Sancho de Castile 1135-1158
> 403,345,061 - Blanca de Pamplona -1158
> 475,004,939 - Sancha Alfonsez de Castile 1138-1177
o Generation 30
> 806,690,085 - Urraca de Castile -1126
> 806,690,122 - Garcia Ramirez de Navarre 1110-1150
o Generation 31
> 1,613,380,170 - Alfonso de Castile, King 1033..1040-1109
> 1,613,380,244 - Ramire Sanchez de Navarre 1060-1116
o Generation 32
> 3,226,760,340 - Ferdinand de Castile 1015-1065
> 3,226,760,341 - Sancia de Leon 1014-1067
> 3,226,760,488 - Ramire Garcia de Navarre 1040-
o Generation 33
> 6,453,520,680 - Sanche Garces de Navarre 991-1035
> 6,453,520,682 - Alphonse de Leon 994-1028
> 6,453,520,976 - Garcia Sanche de Navarre 1016-1054
o Generation 34
> 12,907,041,360 - Garcia Sanche de Navarre 964-999
> 12,907,041,365 - Elvira Garcia de Castille -1017
o Generation 35
> 25,814,082,720 - Sancho Garces Abarca de Pampelune 936-994
> 25,814,082,721 - Urraca Fernandez de Castille 935-1005
> 25,814,082,730 - Garcia de Castille 938-995
o Generation 36
> 51,628,165,440 - Garcia Sanchez de Pampelune 919-970
> 51,628,165,443 - Sancha Sanchez de Navarre 900-959
o Generation 37
> 103,256,330,881 - Toda Uracca Asnarez Iniga de Larraun 881-960
o Generation 38
> 206,512,661,763 - Onneca Iniga Fortunes de Pampelune 847-
o Generation 39
> 413,025,323,527 - Auria Ibn Lopo Ibn Musa 838-
o Generation 40
> 826,050,647,054 - Loup Ibn Musa Ibn Musa 820-842
o Generation 41
> 1,652,101,294,108 - Musa Ibn Al-Qasi Ibn Musa 788-863
o Generation 42
> 3,304,202,588,216 - Musa Ibn Fortun Ibn Musa 740-788
o Generation 43
> 6,608,405,176,433 - Aisha Ibn Musa 715-
o Generation 44
> 13,216,810,352,866 - Abd Al Aziz Ibn Musa Ibn Musa 685-717
o Generation 45
> 26,433,620,705,733 - X l’Omeyyade 660-
o Generation 46
> 52,867,241,411,467 - Aisha l’Omeyyade 624-
o Generation 47
> 105,734,482,822,935 - Rukaiya Bint Muhammed Banu Hachim ca 605-624
o Generation 48
> 211,468,965,645,870 - Muhammed Ibn Abd Allah Al-Mustafa Banu Hachim 570-632
Your NYTimes link says Enrique Marquez was at work at Walmart during the shooting. During the police dispatch recording that day, the cops were all around a Walmart chasing that mysterious third gunman. Just sayin’.
Check out graphic at # 9,531 .
And then, read to end of page. See Brown Deer's genealogy report at # 9,535 .
Brown Deer, that was a lot of work and your due diligence is appreciated.
Interesting comment by bgill at # 9,535 .
Eye witnesses say it was NOT the muzzie couple doing the shooting, but three tall WHITE men in special outfits, hmmm!!!
Sandy Hook 2.0???
“Mama Lois” Anderson: 79, and her 52 year old daughter Zelda White: Two US women aid workers were shot dead in Nairobi in Kenya (2008) were the retired Presbyterian Church missionaries of Pennsylvania (USA), known to thousands of Africans.
The suspected killers of the US women, who were travelling in a car with diplomatic license plates, allegedly shot dead by police later. They were well known for their work.
There is speculation that they possibly had knowledge of the birth and care for Barack Obama in Kenya and were later murdered to cover the trail. When murdered, the Husband had his full wallet which the thieves/car jacker didn’t take, and there was never a connection made to the said attackers the police later shot dead, but blamed for the double homicide/car jacking.
Their church was burned in 2008, possibly to destroy any possible birth records there. Then police chief Mohammed Hussein Ali was later removed from office by Obama supported Kenyan strongman Odinga.
All possible witnesses ended up dead, all possible records of the care of infant Obama burned in the church fire, and the public official responsible out of office.
Dozens Killed In Kenya Church Fire
Wednesday, January 2, 2008
http://www.worthynews.com/1556-dozens-killed-in-kenya-church-fire
Kenya’s Police Chief Fired: The Start of Reform?
By Nick Wadhams / Nairobi Wednesday, Sept. 16, 2009
Where are Obama's daughters' baby pics and birth records?
Posted on November 29, 2013
(photoshopped)
http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2013/11/29/where-are-obamas-daughters-baby-pics-and-birth-records/
What came first, the Obama or the Egg
Saturday, January 30, 2016
There has been speculation as to why there are no photos of the Obama girls as infants...
The Lame Cherry decided to inquire:
http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2016/01/what-came-first-obama-or-egg.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.