Skip to comments.
Researchers Develop "Radio-genetics" – New Method Triggers Gene Expression With Radio Waves or Magnetic Field
rpi.edu ^
| December 15, 2014
| Mary L. Martialay
Posted on 08/27/2021 2:40:29 PM PDT by ransomnote
[H/T to 444Flyer for including the link to this article in post #61 on FR for speculative consideration in relation to the 'metal particles' Japan found in its Covid vaccine shipment]
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Researchers Partner in Research Described in Nature Medicine
Troy, N.Y. — It’s the most basic of ways to find out what something does, whether it’s an unmarked circuit breaker or an unidentified gene — flip its switch and see what happens. New remote-control technology may offer biologists a powerful way to do this with cells and genes. A team at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and Rockefeller University is developing a system that would make it possible to remotely control biological targets in living animals — rapidly, without wires, implants, or drugs.
In a technical report published today in the journal Nature Medicine, the team describes successfully using electromagnetic waves to turn on insulin production to lower blood sugar in diabetic mice. Their system couples a natural iron storage particle, ferritin, to activate an ion channel called TRPV1 such that when the metal particle is exposed to a radio wave or magnetic field, it opens the channel, leading to the activation of an insulin-producing gene. Together, the two proteins act as a nano-machine that can be used to trigger gene expression in cells.
“The use of a radiofrequency-driven magnetic field is a big advance in remote gene expression because it is non-invasive and easily adaptable,” said Jonathan S. Dordick, the Howard P. Isermann Professor of Chemical and Biological Engineering and vice president for research at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. “You don’t have to insert anything — no wires, no light systems — the genes are introduced through gene therapy. You could have a wearable device that provides a magnetic field to certain parts of the body and it might be used therapeutically for many diseases, including neurodegenerative diseases. It's limitless at this point.”
MORE AT LINK
TOPICS: Astronomy; Miscellaneous; Science
KEYWORDS: astronomy; catastrophism; godsgravesglyphs; gps; helixmakemineadouble; magneticfield; magnetism; poleshift; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: Bikkuri
Wouldn’t that be mell of a hess? Conventional wisdom says 5G can’t cause harm. This might be a heretofore uninvestigated aspect to RF.
21
posted on
08/27/2021 3:50:03 PM PDT
by
GingisK
To: deks
“We are now exploring whether the method can also be used to control neural activity as a means for noninvasively modulating the activity of neural circuits.” Marilyn M. Simpson, Professor and head of the Laboratory of Molecular Genetics at Rockefeller UniversityI'll be God-damned. I thought you were exaggerating for effect. But she actually said that.
Hallucinations invoked from a distance. Shutdown of all voluntary -- or even involuntary -- activity. The potential for mass control of the populace is limitless.
22
posted on
08/27/2021 3:52:15 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(I feel like it is 1937 Germany, and my last name is Feinberg.)
To: GingisK; TianaHighrider
You should look at this thread. If I have to eat crow, please serve it with Louisiana Hot Sauce.
23
posted on
08/27/2021 3:56:30 PM PDT
by
GingisK
To: ransomnote
Havana Syndrome?
If this tech is real, us hearing about it is not the beginning of anything except more awareness.
24
posted on
08/27/2021 4:09:28 PM PDT
by
JustaTech
(A mind is a terrible thing)
To: mewzilla
I take that as a rhetorical question.
To: ransomnote
Those conspiracy theories about magnetic vaccines and G5 activation were just priming the pump.
26
posted on
08/27/2021 4:32:57 PM PDT
by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: 444Flyer
totalitarians are still the same
27
posted on
08/27/2021 4:40:52 PM PDT
by
aspasia
To: ZOOKER
I quoted Dr. Ian Malcolm here just yesterday.
28
posted on
08/27/2021 6:11:40 PM PDT
by
EEGator
To: ZOOKER
That’s a great scene, and Goldblum was great in that role.
29
posted on
08/27/2021 6:12:11 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: ransomnote
30
posted on
08/27/2021 6:13:04 PM PDT
by
EEGator
To: mewzilla
Which to a laywoman, makes no sense. I’ll leave it up to the more enlightened FRers to keep to let me know when we’re in more deep chit! :-)
To: mewzilla
Graphene, and I think Chancellor Palpatine is a sith lord, if you get my meaning.
32
posted on
08/27/2021 6:31:14 PM PDT
by
conservativeimage
(Do not go quietly into that good night. We won't be taken alive. Molon Labe.)
To: mewzilla
This is a message from 5G: execute order 66.
33
posted on
08/27/2021 6:46:32 PM PDT
by
conservativeimage
(Do not go quietly into that good night. We won't be taken alive. Molon Labe.)
To: Lazamataz
It’s like we’re in a movie, as all of this unfolds...which movie I don’t know, as I’m not a regular moviegoer))
34
posted on
08/27/2021 7:39:50 PM PDT
by
deks
To: GingisK
Thank you very much for the link. Very interested.
35
posted on
08/27/2021 10:15:11 PM PDT
by
TianaHighrider
(God bless President Trump. Prayers for PDJT and his loyal supporters.)
To: GingisK
Perhaps there is basis for the otherwise absurd notion that 5G radio is harmful. The article didn’t indicate the wavelength or intensity needed to cause the flip.
...
Wouldn’t that be mell of a hess? Conventional wisdom says 5G can’t cause harm. This might be a heretofore uninvestigated aspect to RF.
5G encompasses an incredibly wide range of frequencies, using the current cell freqs of around 600-900Mhz, up to around 100GHz. Most are still using low-band on the old cell frequencies, and mid-high bands in the 3-5Ghz range. FCC has auctioned off higher bands in the 20-50s Ghz, but I don't think too many carriers have rolled those out yet, if the current phones can even support those frequencies. And they're looking at selling off up to 100GHz as well.
To put the 5G frequencies in perspective:
Infrared light goes from near visible down to about 300GHz.
Your wireless router is already spreading EMF around your house in the 2.4GHz and likely 5GHz bands.
Your microwave runs around 2.45GHz, and commercial microwaves are often at 915 MHz.
Air Traffic Control radar is usually in the 1-4GHz range.
Weather radar is around 2-12GHz
Marine radars are generally the same, between 2-12GHz.
Popo radar guns run on bands right around 24.1GHz for Kband radars, and down around 10GHz for XBand radars.
Red light cameras are usually triggered by a sensor spraying you with 34.3GHz EMF.
DirectTV transponders are around 18-20GHz.
GPS satellites are pushing 1.2-1.6GHz, and GLONASS and the European ones are in the same range.
TxDoT traffic sensors run on 10.525GHz.
Bluetooth devices run from 2.4 to 2.5GHz.
RFID chips can vary from 850-950MHz, or 2.45 to 5.8GHz.
Unless there's somehow a very specific frequency that does damage somehow, 5G isn't going to be doing much to you. Ionizing radiation doesn't hit until you get midway through the ultraviolet light frequency, and 5G isn't anywhere close to that. Sure, too much exposure to EMF radiation isn't good for you, but there's a lot of background EMF already, and none of this is going to be powerful enough to hurt.
To: Svartalfiar
That was a nice post. I already know all of that; and, have posted the same when I encounter people who are afraid of 5G. The longest wavelength that is known to interact at the molecular level is UV, which 1000 times shorter than the shortest wavelength being considered by 5G.
The article in question, however, indicated: Their system couples a natural iron storage particle, ferritin, to activate an ion channel called TRPV1 such that when the metal particle is exposed to a radio wave or magnetic field, it opens the channel, leading to the activation of an insulin-producing gene.
This is an avenue that has not been factored into the research that evaluated risks posed by RF energy. It is an indirect association of the effects of the magnetic component of RF to cellular structures. "Ferritin" might be present in the body naturally (I guess that it is), and might be an RF damage link not previously noticed. It seems that the science may not be settled.
37
posted on
08/29/2021 7:22:29 AM PDT
by
GingisK
It won't stop at injections, or "passes". They are heading straight for this "Embedded tech"...(Read Revelation 13:16-17 and the rest of the Book of Revelation, Mr. Schwab. That's how things will "change" for you and all who reject the gospel.)
38
posted on
09/02/2021 8:33:50 AM PDT
by
444Flyer
(John 3, Revelation 20, Joshua 24:15, 1 Kings 18:16-39, Pick a side...)
This topic was posted , thanks ransomnote.
39
posted on
09/06/2021 7:09:50 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson