Posted on 03/05/2018 12:05:20 AM PST by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3636549/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following link:
You can locate my Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. Its to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. Ill put the link to their general Youtube channel here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
And, future proves the past.
We should have seen it move out into the economy and be available for spending during the last eight years, but it didnt seem to trickle out. It should have appeared in a higher inflation rate because productivity was down. Work hours were down. We saw a lot of smoke and mirrors being played with numbers from the government statistics. . . especially the inflation indicators. Yet unless they were REALLY hiding a huge rise in prices somewhere as those more dollars chased fewer goods and services, then those pump priming dollars were going somewhere else than into OUR economy. (Some was certainly in higher healthcare costs due to Ocare) Do you think that money was going off shore like I do?
Likely a good addition, only, spell drought correctly.
As a beer drinker, I’d be very upset if someone fiddled with my draught.
Much stronger than having only oral testimony. The amount of doubt will depend on the "chain of custody" that produced and protected the duplicates. Could be highly reliable.
Just now got thinking about "fakes" and the NYT article about how videos can be faked. Where was that skepticism on 0bama's pdf BC forgery?
A character from Galaxy Quest. You whisper his name
Yea...sorry not buying that. Im sure NYPD cops wouldve loved to bag Hillary. She isnt a nice person and they all know it. If they had the goods on her, wed have found out. Not every cop is a chickenshit about threats to them and if a bunch saw a video with Hillary diddling kids, wed know. Ill just say that with certainty.
I think that money was going everywhere to the crooks and criminals money laundering operations, and good bit of it likely into various Soros funds to keep the agitation going etc. The stunt he pulled with the car companies, and the “green” energy was blatant pay off to cronies and various voting groups.
There certainly was quite a bit of inflation of food prices, a lot of it in smaller packaging verses price hikes. The business reports all said that Bernake was worried about deflation at the time. We really had to watch our budget since 2008.
I sold off half of all my mutual funds and stocks in IRAs in Dec. 2007, because when I was looking for a stock to buy, I couldn’t find a single one that was not overvalued. So when the market crashed in 2008, I bought some stuff real cheap.
Mostly financial, but also some Ford. When prices doubled, I sold half to get back the principal, and let the rest ride. I didn’t reinvest all of it, because I had retired, and wanted to leave some in liquid, but conservative investments to pay off a loan if push came to shove.
I might have invested more, if I had had the time. I was staying with my Dad at the hospital 24/7, and only had access to computer for 20 min. per day.
Agreed about OBummer's Birth certificate.
In the photo without Clinton, over the water, rather than a halo around the sun, it could be a possible bright light explosion
They just weren't able or some such to follow-through with prosecution--probably due to forced handing it off to the FBI.
Are you minimizing the degree to which the oligarchy has been VERY !CONTROLLING! with all levels of law enforcement and judiciary for decades???
Yes, because again, whether the fbi controls the info, someone wouldve said something in the NYPD. Im not buying it. Now it could be they had a picture of a woman doing bad things to a child and thought it looked like huma or Hillary, but if they saw her for sure, itd be out a long time ago.
I think your assumptions about group or even individual behavior in such a context are flawed.
There are several to a dozen reasons why your assumptions might not be operative in such a case.
And, the information did come out--just not the video publicly.
If the video comes out 11 MARCH ... will your assumptions change at all?
Ill wait and see what comes out. Id like as much as anyone to see Hillary behind bars regardless of what the ultimate evidence is, it I think she already should be for the email issue.
I'd be careful about pinning down a date, Jockmeister.
P.S. There is a new Q thread open for business. Scroll up for link.
Very reasonable, for sure. However, this seems to be much more pointed from Q-Anon than ever before, IIRC.
>> strategically critical goods
Thank you for an enlightening post. I’m learning!
I think “strategically critical goods” is the key point. So maybe it’s good to have “free trade” in yo-yos and whiffle balls. But steel is an entirely different matter.
Yes, but plans can change.
Ah. You are right.
evil
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.