Posted on 06/07/2010 5:29:41 PM PDT by decimon
The Earth and Moon were created as the result of a giant collision between two planets the size of Mars and Venus. Until now it was thought to have happened when the solar system was 30 million years old or approx. 4,537 million years ago. But new research from the Niels Bohr Institute shows that the Earth and Moon must have formed much later perhaps up to 150 million years after the formation of the solar system. The research results have been published in the scientific journal, Earth and Planetary Science Letters.
"We have determined the ages of the Earth and the Moon using tungsten isotopes, which can reveal whether the iron cores and their stone surfaces have been mixed together during the collision", explains Tais W. Dahl, who did the research as his thesis project in geophysics at the Niels Bohr Institute at the University of Copenhagen in collaboration with professor David J. Stevenson from the California Institute of Technology (Caltech).
Turbulent collisions
The planets in the solar system were created by collisions between small dwarf planets orbiting the newborn sun. In the collisions the small planets melted together and formed larger and larger planets. The Earth and Moon are the result of a gigantic collision between two planets the size of Mars and Venus. The two planets collided at a time when both had a core of metal (iron) and a surrounding mantle of silicates (rock). But when did it happen and how did it happen? The collision took place in less than 24 hours and the temperature of the Earth was so high (7000º C), that both rock and metal must have melted in the turbulent collision. But were the stone mass and iron mass also mixed together?
Until recently it was believed that the rock and iron mixed completely during the planet formation and so the conclusion was that the Moon was formed when the solar system was 30 million years old or approximately 4,537 million years ago. But new research shows something completely different.
Dating with radioactive elements
The age of the Earth and Moon can be dated by examining the presence of certain elements in the Earth's mantle. Hafnium-182 is a radioactive substance, which decays and is converted into the isotope tungsten-182. The two elements have markedly different chemical properties and while the tungsten isotopes prefer to bond with metal, hafnium prefers to bond to silicates, i.e. rock.
It takes 50-60 million years for all hafnium to decay and be converted into tungsten, and during the Moon forming collision nearly all the metal sank into the Earth's core. But did all the tungsten go into the core?
"We have studied to what degree metal and rock mix together during the planet forming collisions. Using dynamic model calculations of the turbulent mixing of the liquid rock and iron masses we have found that tungsten isotopes from the Earth's early formation remain in the rocky mantle", explains Tais W. Dahl, Niels Bohr Institute at the University of Copenhagen.
The new studies imply that the moon forming collision occurred after all of the hafnium had decayed completely into tungsten.
"Our results show that metal core and rock are unable to emulsify in these collisions between planets that are greater than 10 kilometres in diameter and therefore that most of the Earth's iron core (80-99 %) did not remove tungsten from the rocky material in the mantle during formation", explains Tais W. Dahl.
The result of the research means that the Earth and the Moon must have been formed much later than previously thought that is to say not 30 million years after the formation of the solar system 4,567 million years ago but perhaps up to 150 million years after the formation of the solar system.
###
Contact: Tais W. Dahl, PhD. geochemistry, Cand. Scient. geophysics, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen. Currently at Harvard University: 00 1 617-817-5506, tdahl@fas.harvard.edu
Better late than never ping.
ML/NJ
It’s easy to change details on “science” that is entirely made up!
“The Earth and moon formed later than previously thought”
Oh nooez! That completely discounts all of TToE, since the Earth is only 6,000 years old and this proves so-called “science” is just guesswork!
(/Creationist)
They came in earlier than I predicted, but come in they did.
Considering that none of this is provable, it’s not science.
P.S. I don’t believe that the earth is only 6,000 years old. Man, however, may very well be.
>>Considering that none of this is provable, its not science.<<
Then you don’t know what science is.
The Earth and Moon were created as the result of a giant collision between two planets the size of Mars and Venus... Hafnium-182 is a radioactive substance, which decays and is converted into the isotope tungsten-182... It takes 50-60 million years for all hafnium to decay and be converted into tungsten, and during the Moon forming collision nearly all the metal sank into the Earth's core... the moon forming collision occurred after all of the hafnium had decayed completely into tungsten. "Our results show that metal core and rock are unable to emulsify in these collisions between planets that are greater than 10 kilometres in diameter and therefore that most of the Earth's iron core (80-99 %) did not remove tungsten from the rocky material in the mantle during formation", explains Tais W. Dahl.
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe · | ||
>>P.S. I dont believe that the earth is only 6,000 years old. Man, however, may very well be.<<
There are very specific remnants showing Man to reach back to millions of years.
And, assuming you don’t understand TToE, there are artifacts of modern man that date to 8,000 years ago.
|
|||
Gods |
Thanks decimon. |
||
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
I mourn their loss.
(sniffle...)
Damn, another freeper figures it out....
Somebody who’s really dumb, isn’t really free...
Sophistries of "proof" have been around for a long, long time.
>>Well, one third of your screen name is apropos.<<
yes, being “free” of Luddite-dogma is quite apropos.
But thanks for proving my point.
Computer models of extremely complex processes. I shudder.
>>Damn, another freeper figures it out....<<
Damn, another Freeper doesn’t understand science. That seems to be qite a popular stance these days.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.