Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Earth and moon formed later than previously thought
University of Copenhagen ^ | Jun 7, 2010 | Unknown

Posted on 06/07/2010 5:29:41 PM PDT by decimon

The Earth and Moon were created as the result of a giant collision between two planets the size of Mars and Venus. Until now it was thought to have happened when the solar system was 30 million years old or approx. 4,537 million years ago. But new research from the Niels Bohr Institute shows that the Earth and Moon must have formed much later – perhaps up to 150 million years after the formation of the solar system. The research results have been published in the scientific journal, Earth and Planetary Science Letters.

"We have determined the ages of the Earth and the Moon using tungsten isotopes, which can reveal whether the iron cores and their stone surfaces have been mixed together during the collision", explains Tais W. Dahl, who did the research as his thesis project in geophysics at the Niels Bohr Institute at the University of Copenhagen in collaboration with professor David J. Stevenson from the California Institute of Technology (Caltech).

Turbulent collisions

The planets in the solar system were created by collisions between small dwarf planets orbiting the newborn sun. In the collisions the small planets melted together and formed larger and larger planets. The Earth and Moon are the result of a gigantic collision between two planets the size of Mars and Venus. The two planets collided at a time when both had a core of metal (iron) and a surrounding mantle of silicates (rock). But when did it happen and how did it happen? The collision took place in less than 24 hours and the temperature of the Earth was so high (7000º C), that both rock and metal must have melted in the turbulent collision. But were the stone mass and iron mass also mixed together?

Until recently it was believed that the rock and iron mixed completely during the planet formation and so the conclusion was that the Moon was formed when the solar system was 30 million years old or approximately 4,537 million years ago. But new research shows something completely different.

Dating with radioactive elements

The age of the Earth and Moon can be dated by examining the presence of certain elements in the Earth's mantle. Hafnium-182 is a radioactive substance, which decays and is converted into the isotope tungsten-182. The two elements have markedly different chemical properties and while the tungsten isotopes prefer to bond with metal, hafnium prefers to bond to silicates, i.e. rock.

It takes 50-60 million years for all hafnium to decay and be converted into tungsten, and during the Moon forming collision nearly all the metal sank into the Earth's core. But did all the tungsten go into the core?

"We have studied to what degree metal and rock mix together during the planet forming collisions. Using dynamic model calculations of the turbulent mixing of the liquid rock and iron masses we have found that tungsten isotopes from the Earth's early formation remain in the rocky mantle", explains Tais W. Dahl, Niels Bohr Institute at the University of Copenhagen.

The new studies imply that the moon forming collision occurred after all of the hafnium had decayed completely into tungsten.

"Our results show that metal core and rock are unable to emulsify in these collisions between planets that are greater than 10 kilometres in diameter and therefore that most of the Earth's iron core (80-99 %) did not remove tungsten from the rocky material in the mantle during formation", explains Tais W. Dahl.

The result of the research means that the Earth and the Moon must have been formed much later than previously thought – that is to say not 30 million years after the formation of the solar system 4,567 million years ago but perhaps up to 150 million years after the formation of the solar system.

###

Contact: Tais W. Dahl, PhD. geochemistry, Cand. Scient. geophysics, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen. Currently at Harvard University: 00 1 617-817-5506, tdahl@fas.harvard.edu


TOPICS: Astronomy; Local News; Science
KEYWORDS: astronomy; catastrophism; godsgravesglyphs; lunarorigin; moon; science; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

1 posted on 06/07/2010 5:29:41 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Better late than never ping.


2 posted on 06/07/2010 5:30:27 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
Does this mean all the fairy tales I learned in college were wrong?

ML/NJ

3 posted on 06/07/2010 5:32:20 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

It’s easy to change details on “science” that is entirely made up!


4 posted on 06/07/2010 5:32:33 PM PDT by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: decimon

“The Earth and moon formed later than previously thought”

Oh nooez! That completely discounts all of TToE, since the Earth is only 6,000 years old and this proves so-called “science” is just guesswork!

(/Creationist)


5 posted on 06/07/2010 5:32:45 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The frog who accepts a ride from a scorpion should expect a sting and the phrase "it is my nature.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

They came in earlier than I predicted, but come in they did.


6 posted on 06/07/2010 5:35:06 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The frog who accepts a ride from a scorpion should expect a sting and the phrase "it is my nature.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Considering that none of this is provable, it’s not science.


7 posted on 06/07/2010 5:35:37 PM PDT by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

P.S. I don’t believe that the earth is only 6,000 years old. Man, however, may very well be.


8 posted on 06/07/2010 5:36:38 PM PDT by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JDW11235

>>Considering that none of this is provable, it’s not science.<<

Then you don’t know what science is.


9 posted on 06/07/2010 5:38:05 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The frog who accepts a ride from a scorpion should expect a sting and the phrase "it is my nature.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
Thanks decimon!
The Earth and Moon were created as the result of a giant collision between two planets the size of Mars and Venus... Hafnium-182 is a radioactive substance, which decays and is converted into the isotope tungsten-182... It takes 50-60 million years for all hafnium to decay and be converted into tungsten, and during the Moon forming collision nearly all the metal sank into the Earth's core... the moon forming collision occurred after all of the hafnium had decayed completely into tungsten. "Our results show that metal core and rock are unable to emulsify in these collisions between planets that are greater than 10 kilometres in diameter and therefore that most of the Earth's iron core (80-99 %) did not remove tungsten from the rocky material in the mantle during formation", explains Tais W. Dahl.
 
Catastrophism
 
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·
 

10 posted on 06/07/2010 5:38:37 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Oh nooez! That completely discounts all of TToE, since the Earth is only 6,000 years old and this proves so-called “science” is just guesswork!

(/Creationist)


Well, one third of your screen name is apropos.
11 posted on 06/07/2010 5:39:48 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JDW11235

>>P.S. I don’t believe that the earth is only 6,000 years old. Man, however, may very well be.<<

There are very specific remnants showing Man to reach back to millions of years.

And, assuming you don’t understand TToE, there are artifacts of modern man that date to 8,000 years ago.


12 posted on 06/07/2010 5:40:10 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The frog who accepts a ride from a scorpion should expect a sting and the phrase "it is my nature.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: decimon; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 240B; 24Karet; ...

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Thanks decimon.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

·Dogpile · Archaeologica · LiveScience · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google ·
· The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


13 posted on 06/07/2010 5:40:16 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
The Earth and Moon were created as the result of a giant collision between two planets the size of Mars and Venus.

I mourn their loss.

(sniffle...)

14 posted on 06/07/2010 5:40:21 PM PDT by SIDENET ("If that's your best, your best won't do." -Dee Snider)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JDW11235
Considering that none of this is provable, it’s not science.

Damn, another freeper figures it out....

15 posted on 06/07/2010 5:40:52 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Somebody who’s really dumb, isn’t really free...


16 posted on 06/07/2010 5:41:40 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946
Damn, another freeper figures it out....

Sophistries of "proof" have been around for a long, long time.

17 posted on 06/07/2010 5:42:58 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

>>Well, one third of your screen name is apropos.<<

yes, being “free” of Luddite-dogma is quite apropos.

But thanks for proving my point.


18 posted on 06/07/2010 5:43:00 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The frog who accepts a ride from a scorpion should expect a sting and the phrase "it is my nature.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Computer models of extremely complex processes. I shudder.


19 posted on 06/07/2010 5:44:10 PM PDT by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

>>Damn, another freeper figures it out....<<

Damn, another Freeper doesn’t understand science. That seems to be qite a popular stance these days.


20 posted on 06/07/2010 5:44:15 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The frog who accepts a ride from a scorpion should expect a sting and the phrase "it is my nature.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson