Posted on 07/03/2008 4:35:19 PM PDT by SE Mom
Jay McKinnon, a self-described Department of Homeland Security-trained document specialist, has implicated himself in the production of fraudulent Hawaii birth certificate images similar to the one endorsed as genuine by the Barack Obama campaign, and appearing on the same blog entry where the supposedly authentic document appears.
The evidence of forgery and manipulation of images of official documents, triggered by Israel Insider's revelation of the collection of Hawaii birth certificate images on the Photobucket site and the detective work of independent investigative journalists and imaging professionals in the three weeks since the publication of the images, implicate the Daily Kos, an extreme left blog site, and the Obama campaign, in misleading the public with official-looking but manipulated document images of doubtful provenance.
The perceived unreliability of the image has provoked petitions and widespread demands for Obama to submit for objective inspection the paper versions of the "birth certificate" he claimed in his book Dreams from My Father was in his possession, as well as the paper version of the Certificate of Live Birth for which the image on the Daily Kos and the Obama "Fight the Smears" website was supposedly generated.
Without a valid birth certificate, Obama cannot prove he fulfills the "natural born citizen" requirement of the Constitution, throwing into doubt his eligibility to run for President.
McKinnon, who says he is 25-30 years old, operates a website called OpenDNA.com and uses the OpenDNA screen name on various web sites and blogs, including his comments and diary on The Daily Kos. In recent years he has divided his time between Long Beach, California and Vancouver, British Columbia. He is a Democratic political activist, frequent contributor to the left wing Daily Kos blog, and a fervent Barack Obama supporter.
(Excerpt) Read more at web.israelinsider.com ...
Thanks, anonymous.
Here’s frmail; check it out.
“I found something strange, but don’t know if it’s important or not.
Barack is the ANGLICIZED, (WHITE,) version of Barak. obama Sr. never used the name “Barack.”
I found a government document he wrote after he had already gone back to Kenya. His name was BARAK, not Barack.
Every article now written about him contains the Anglicized version of his name because that is the name Barack Obama GAVE HIMSELF. It was NOT the name his father used.”
This image is from 1965:
http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e174/KyraAyn/EvilThings/Zero/BARAK.jpg
Not only does Obama not meet the Constitutional requirements to be president, he’s an illegal immigrant.
Your claim could be correct since Obama’s advertised Selective Service registration form may be a forgery.
You wrote-
“Not only does Obama not meet the Constitutional requirements to be president, he’s an illegal immigrant.”
As written by their fellow commie traveler: Back in the USSR, you don't know how lucky you are..... John Lennon. Yesterday's hippy commies are sitting in today's Congress and WH. No doubt about it.
Until and unless we ever see the first two filings in the Hawaiian vital records vault, we will not know for sure if he was spelled Barack or Barak on short form registry in HI. At Occi, he used Barack as a nom de plume until he decided to become the fantasy character at Columbia he had developed out of the nom de plume. He was Barry Soetoro at Occi. Criminal behavior is merely an embarrassment to democrats, and then only if they get caught.
” Lolo Soetoro also known as Lolo Soetoro Mangunharjo[1][2] or Mangundikardjo,[3] (new spelling: Lolo Sutoro)”
So,it’s possible, if Barry was adopted and had his name legally changed that we have a
President Barack Hussein Obama Soetero Mangunharjo .
Or Barry Mangun for short.
How ironic.
US Defense Security Service Guidelines, Federal Statute 50 USC 435 and Executive Order 12968 Indicate That Various Agency Heads Should Deny President Obama Access To Classified Information.
###
A thorough review of national security clearance guidelines and federal statutes indicates that various heads of government agencies in charge of disseminating classified information should deny access to classified information to President Obama unless and until he undergoes a statutory background check and achieves a proper security clearance.
This article stipulates that it is common practice for the FBI to grant full security clearance to elected officials such as Congressman and Senators. The same courtesy has been extended to the office of President and Vice President. This is done in recognition that these elected officials represent the will of the American people.
However, federal law mandates that if such courtesy conflicts with national security then agency heads are expected to deny access to classified information. In President Obama we have a Commander In Chief who admits to having been a British citizen as well as a citizen of Kenya.
Furthermore, President Obama may still be a a British citizen and/or subject. He may have also been a citizen of Indonesia.
We just don’t know the answers to these questions because he just won’t answer them.
US Defense Security Service guidelines are very clear in that persons with past allegiance to foreign nations are to undergo security checks to determine whether such allegiance is dangerous to the US:
Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be disqualifying include:
a. The exercise of dual citizenship;
b. Possession and/or use of a foreign passport;
c. Military service or a willingness to bear arms for a foreign country;
d. Accepting educational, medical, or other benefits, such as retirement and social welfare, from a foreign country;
f. Residence in a foreign country to meet citizenship requirements;
g. Using foreign citizenship to protect financial or business interests in another country;
h. Seeking or holding political office in the foreign country;
h. Voting in foreign elections; and
i. Performing or attempting to perform duties, or otherwise acting, so as to serve the interests of another government in preference to the interests of the United States.
Conditions that could mitigate security concerns include:
a. Dual citizenship is based solely on parents’ citizenship or birth in a foreign country;
b. Indicators of possible foreign preference (e.g., foreign military service) occurred before obtaining United States citizenship;
c. Activity is sanctioned by the United States;
d. Individual has expressed a willingness to renounce dual citizenship.
Above Information Courtesy of Defense Security Service (DSS) (Emphasis added.)
——————————
The government security guidelines examine whether the person has renounced his foreign citizenship. The issue of whether Obama is still a British citizen or subject must be addressed by a proper US government background clearance examination since it appears President Obama has never renounced his UK citizenship or subject status.
A forthcoming report at this blog will detail the intricacies of British nationality law with regard to whether President Obama is currently under the domain of the UK. But this should be done by our government officials as well. If he is under their domain, he’s also under the domain of the European Union.
Federal Statute 50 USC 435. Executive Order 12968.
50 USC 435 is the federal statute concerned with the classification of sensitive information. It empowered Executive Order 12968 which was enacted by President Clinton in 1995. These laws provide the Executive Branch rules for granting security clearance to classified information.
EO 12968 exempts the President and the Vice President from having to pass a security clearance examination. However, both 50 USC 435 and Executive Order 12968 contain the same exact safety provision empowering agency heads to deny access to classified information upon their own discretion.
50 USC 435 states:
Subsection (a) of this section shall not be deemed to limit or affect the responsibility and power of an agency head pursuant to other law or Executive order to deny or terminate access to classified information if the national security so requires.
Such responsibility and power may be exercised only when the agency head determines that the procedures prescribed by subsection (a) of this section cannot be invoked in a manner that is consistent with the national security.
Executive order 12968 Section 5.2 (e) states:
(e) This section shall not be deemed to limit or affect the responsibility and power of an agency head pursuant to any law or other Executive order to deny or terminate access to classified information in the interests of national security.
The power and responsibility to deny or terminate access to classified information pursuant to any law or other Executive order may be exercised only where the agency head determines that the procedures prescribed in subsection (a) of this section cannot be invoked in a manner that is consistent with national security. This determination shall be conclusive.
Since the President and Vice President are exempted from these regulations, the regulations can’t be invoked in a manner consistent with national security. As such, any agency head who determines that providing the President with classified information is inconsistent with national security may withhold such information.
According to law, such a determination is conclusive. No review is even possible.
President Obama should submit to a full security clearance examination before a national crisis takes place. Agency heads who continue to provide classified information to President Obama do so at the risk of national security. President Obama was a citizen of at least two foreign nations and his passport history is unknown.
It appears that he may still be legally subject to the monarchy of Great Britain. This would trigger issues concerning the Master Nationality Rule whenever Obama stands on British soil.
These issues are not trivial. But for Obama being President, he would have to provide everything discussed in the Defense Security guidelines. He is also charged with enforcing those very same guidelines. How can he enforce them with a straight face if he’s never submitted to them himself?
President Obama has never officially renounced or denied his British citizenship. And he has admitted that he was a British citizen at birth.
His past is so intertwined with various other nations that it is impossible, without a proper security clearance examination, for agency heads to forward classified information to him without concern. Government agency heads in charge of releasing classified information have the undeniable legal right to deny the President classified information.
Until President Obama’s passport and citizenship status in other nations is thoroughly determined, agency heads who forward him classified information do so with unknown risks to national security.
There are too many unknowns with regard to past allegiance to foreign powers for such information to be passed on safely. Agency heads cannot afford to be shy or afraid of backlash. Their decision is legally conclusive.
There is no transparency here and I do not see why the President himself is not calling for a proper background check on himself.
Why put the agency heads in this position?
It would be a proper start to necessary transparency if Obama would discuss whether he’s ever held a foreign passport and whether he’s ever traveled under a foreign passport. He should also take the official steps necessary to renounce his prior foreign citizenship.
That’s what a statesman would do.
~~~~
And, alas .. we now know he’s not that.
Good post. Long time coming.
Placemarker
A thorough review of national security clearance guidelines and federal statutes indicates that various heads of government agencies in charge of disseminating classified information should deny access to classified information to President Obama unless and until he undergoes a statutory background check and achieves a proper security clearance.
But don't get your hopes up.
IF BHO Sr, really was his father, he was not "African American", just African. And BHO Jr, is not "African American" in the usual sense and no more so than someone whose father was a white South Afrikan or Rhodesian and whose mother was an American Indian, who raised him apart from the father on the reservation.
Or maybe a Hawaiian from the North Shore. (That's where my 4th grade Hawaiian student teacher was from. She was nice looking I remember that much, even though I was only about 10, although not her name. I also remember she had her mother ship in a bunch of small flowers by air, and we each got a little vial with a little flower in it for Christmas.
That would have been a year before The Messiah was whelped. She would have been about 5 or 6 years older than Stanley Ann. I imagine she's retired by now, but conceivably, she could have been one of his teachers somewhere along the way, although since he spent most of his elementary years in Indonesia, perhaps not.
Most of the remarks I have read acknowledge that obama is a citizen. The controversy revolves around whether or not he is a natural born citizen as stated in Article II section 1 of the constitution.
The state department’s foreign affairs manual referencing children who aquired US citizenship by birth abroad, states that it has “never been definitively determined” whether they are a natural born citizen for the purposes eligibility for president.
My research indicates that the phrase probably meant both parents are citizens and the child was born in the US. Under this meaning the birth certificate is a moot point, because his Kenyan/British father would disqualify him.
To me this is an interesting issue. The term “natural born citizen” has not been defined, yet it is a requirement for the president. I would like to see that issue settled and maybe Alan Keyes lawsuit will lead to that. Further I would like to see all states implement a process to ensure that people registering for a position are qualified.
I also found an interesting Supreme Court case which noted that there have been “doubts” about the citizenship of children born in the US whose parents are not citizens.
They noted then, that this issue was not the question before them, and hence it was not necessary to settle the issue at that time.
I am from Missouri. I say to obama show me all your records. The most “transparent” administration owes it to its citizens to release all his records, and fulfill his campaign promise.
My inquiring mind also wonders why he is so determined to hide his birth records(and other records)-just post it all on the web, let representatives of the opposition and the supporters all examine them and report back (all records not just birth certificate).
The people of America are entitled to know all about the people who run for president before the election. The transparency is long overdue-just MHO.
So. How do we activate these US Defense Security Service guidelines? Can an individual petition the defense dept or military personnel file a request? Must it be done through the court system or otherwise?
Great stuff Star, well organized and right to the point just what is needed in this debacle.
Wow! Question..Does this mean that our security agencies would have ‘standing’ in court to force Obama to release his long form BC and all other pertinent records?
Looks possible. Question: who has the
unwavering guts to stand up and do it?
placemark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.