Home· Settings· Breaking · FrontPage · Extended · Editorial · Activism · News

Prayer  PrayerRequest  SCOTUS  ProLife  BangList  Aliens  HomosexualAgenda  GlobalWarming  Corruption  Taxes  Congress  Fraud  MediaBias  GovtAbuse  Tyranny  Obama  Biden  Elections  POLLS  Debates  TRUMP  TalkRadio  FreeperBookClub  HTMLSandbox  FReeperEd  FReepathon  CopyrightList  Copyright/DMCA Notice 

Monthly Donors · Dollar-a-Day Donors · 300 Club Donors

Click the Donate button to donate by credit card to FR:

or by or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Free Republic 4th Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $15,370
18%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 18%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: scotusvsamerica

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Is the Supreme Court gaslighting us?

    07/01/2021 4:25:01 AM PDT · by MtnClimber · 31 replies
    American Thinker ^ | 1 Jul, 2021 | John Green
    George Washington University Law School Professor Jonathon Turley has posited that recent unanimous Supreme Court rulings may be the court sending a message to politicians. Facing threats to pack the Supreme Court and calls for Justice Stephen Breyer to resign, Turley believes the court is making a rare show of unity. Apparently, the logic is that if they show that they’re not ideological (I know, don’t laugh), the Democrats will understand that packing the court won’t make any difference. They’re trying to validate Chief Justice John Robert’s claim that there are no “Obama judges” or “Trump judges.” There’s just one...
  • SCOTUS Set To Rule If States Can Protect The Integrity Of Their Votes: Efforts of state legislatures to enact new voting protections are in jeopardy if SCOTUS fails to overturn the latest 9th Circuit decision.

    03/24/2021 8:06:24 AM PDT · by SeekAndFind · 34 replies
    The Federalist ^ | 03/24/2021 | Michael J. O’Neill
    Do federal law and the U.S. Constitution prohibit states from enacting commonsense voting requirements designed to protect the integrity of the electoral process, apply to everyone, and impose no significant burden? The Supreme Court tackled this question several weeks ago when it heard oral arguments in a case entitled Brnovich v. Democrat National Committee. Democrats are challenging the legality of two measures used by Arizona to ensure a free and fair electoral process. The first, known as the “out of precinct policy” requires individuals who vote in-person to cast their respective ballots in their designated election location. The second policy...
  • SCOTUS to Hear Election Fraud Cases for Pennsylvania, Michigan & Georgia

    02/14/2021 8:18:43 AM PST · by McQ444 · 115 replies
    NN ^ | 02-14-21 | Jay Greenberg
    The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is set to hear a number of high-profile election fraud cases. The SCOTUS is now scheduled to consider the voter fraud cases for Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Georgia on February 19, 2021.
  • Supreme Court refuses to hear 'birther' argument

    06/11/2012 10:42:09 AM PDT · by Free ThinkerNY · 185 replies
    Associated Press ^ | June 11, 2012
    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to hear an appeal challenging President Barack Obama's U.S. citizenship and his eligibility to serve as commander in chief. Without comment, the high court on Monday refused to hear an appeal from Alan Keyes, Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson.
  • Kelo Home Seized Through Controversial Eminent Domain Taking Now Being Used As A Dumping Ground

    09/02/2011 4:59:09 AM PDT · by icanhasbailout · 46 replies · 1+ views
    Say Anything ^ | September 1, 2011 | Rob Port
    The Kelo vs. New London case saw the Supreme Court expanding the government’s eminent domain powers to include taking property and giving it to other private citizens for the purposes of economic development and enhancing tax revenues. It was a terrible blow to property rights in America. And now, in perhaps a fitting end to the sad chapter in American jurisprudence, the City of New London is now using the property the fought to seize all the way to the Supreme Court as a dumping ground. Video below, and a letter to the editor noting the irony of the city...
  • Supremes get case against 'putative' President Obama

    10/01/2010 6:59:23 PM PDT · by RobinMasters · 102 replies
    WND ^ | October 01, 2010 | Bob Unruh
    A new court filing that returns the issue of Barack Obama's eligibility to the U.S. Supreme Court warns that unless the judiciary makes a definitive decision in the dispute, it will be the same as allowing the political interests in the United States to amend the U.S. Constitution at will. A petition for writ of certiorari has been filed with the high court in the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision to uphold the dismissal of a case brought by attorney Mario Apuzzo on behalf of Charles F. Kerchner Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James Lenormand and Donald H....