In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Zelenskyy tells Putin to 'be brave' and finally agree to trilateral meeting with Trump, blackdog wrote:

Well, that’s a pretty stupid thing to say unless you want talks to fail.

Bingo. Zelensky routinely sabotages peace agreements or meetings. For example, Putin was welcoming peace negotiations and Zelensky responded by invading Kursk. People thought Zelensky was witless for doing that, until some figured out it was intentional. NATO wants WWIII, not peace. They want the US to get directly involved in the war and if Biden were still Potatus, he'd involve our troops.

Either by words or military gestures, Zelensky provokes Putin whenever peace looms. Some of NATO's strategies performed by Zelensky make no sense unless you factor this in. At one point Zelensky said Ukrainian fighter planes would be based in Romania. Putin said any country fielding weapons is therefore a target. So then those planes were going to fly into Ukraine, touch down and take off again to be able to claim they were based in Ukraine. But flying across Ukraine and landing a fighting aircraft so close to the front lines without adequate air support would cause them to be destroyed on the ground. Those F-16's needed pristine runways and Ukraine didn't have any, and couldn't protect any they made. The Ukraine didn't have pilots. They kept coming up with stupid ideas and they only made sense if you look at how Putin reacted to each idea.

I think it's NATO calling the shots - this is NATO's proxy war. NATO wants continuous expansionism (unelected government) and Putin is in their way. 

Pelosi pretended to have profound memory problems when she was worried she would have to testify and then she ‘got better’. I don’t know if Mueller was laying down his excuse during the original trial - that’s his protection from ever being tried for trying to find a sitting President guilty of treason (treason on Mueller’s part). So if Trump never regained office, maybe mueller would be out on the golf course today.

Yes. I don’t see Santa Cruz listed.
This is from the OP:

“. This list is not exhaustive and will be updated as federal authorities gather further information. “

 

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 08/01/2025 Vol.510, Q Day 2835, Melian wrote:

Posting blind: Background photos on Fort Stewart shooter: https://youtu.be/BaJfn3o2XEY?si=VBnI5npKw0Szijea

'note: From your link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaJfn3o2XEY 

Quornelius Radford. MILITARY SHOOTER!! Jacksonville Florida.

JLR© INVESTIGATES!

 

413K subscribers

'note: Image below from his DUI mugshot back on May 18. He's a Sgt. with automated logistics team.

'note: His facebook name when he was a kid (14 yrs old) is shown below. For some reason, a series of his photos (at link) taken when he was a kid feature him extending his middle finger. It looked like every photo or almost every photo- his signature move.

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Justice Department Publishes List of Sanctuary Jurisdictions, 9YearLurker wrote:

So my pathetic blue state is on there. What does it mean, in reality?

I believe it means that President Trump will strategically withold federal funds which the state(s) use to support illegals. Medicaid, SNAP etc.

I have a friend with a child who has been diagnose with multiple malignant brain tumors since infancy. She complies with house rules right up until she grabbed a bicycle (neighbors?) and pedaled away. Her 60 year old baby sitter boldly climbed onto another child’s bike and slowly pedaled after her. The child crossed roads which normally have barreling traffic. In instances like these the baby sitter stopped and called police, but if a fire truck were closer, it would be the fire dept who intercepted her.
They were installing locks on doors but a home just isn’t as secure as a facility, and none were available. Maybe the availability may be due to the old legislation about letting the mentally ill move among us etc. That law has now changed, so funding for children that age may now be available.

The girl was able to enter a program in a home situation (8 residents mentally disabled) near here, with the family carrying many burdensome expenses, and when the child turned 18, the state took over all expenses. Each step of the way, fleets of lawyers were needed to steer the child to safe homes or services.

But I guess there just aren’t parenting options when the child is young. The child had to be adequately socialized to function on her own in a group home setting with disturbed peers and many household care givers.

If the child has emotional problems, she may threaten to harm herself or get herself into situations which need fire personnel to extract her or treat her (many fire truck staff are trained paramedics).

• MAKES SENSE – Devin Nunes: The Raid on Mar-a-Lago Was to Retrieve Declassified HPSCI Report That Deconstructed Obama/Brennan ICA

  8/6/2025, 11:15:14 AM · by george76

  Conservative Treehouse ^ | August 5, 2025 | Sundance

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 08/01/2025 Vol.510, Q Day 2835, little jeremiah wrote:

He’s part of the Q team. Very encouraging stuff!

 

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 08/01/2025 Vol.510, Q Day 2835, Bigg Red wrote:

How do we know he’s part of the Q Team?

 

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 08/01/2025 Vol.510, Q Day 2835, little jeremiah wrote:

I’ve read his account for 2 years. He is clearly part of the Q team; his task on TS was to keep people encouraged.

I read the post and am not sure to whom you are referring.

I believe we are all tasked with keeping people encouraged - Q told us over and over 'stay together'. I can't imagine how we would have fared through the plandemic if we had not stayed together. But, there's always  a loving God looking after us.

I don't trust @01010001 because that account tries too hard to portray itself as Q team. No outside channels, which is to say, he never verified himself nor was he verified by others. I do think that account compiles information together in a way some readers really like, but I wish he didn't 'go all the way' to portraying himself as Q team.

Flynn was wrong about the runup to Trump taking office - he listed all the CIA tactics we'd have to endure, and none of them happened. I believe he correctly reported what teh CIA would like to do, but didn't have knowledge of how Trump and co would deter them. Flynn wrote a post demanding Trump release Epstein files; Trump chided people who say they are his friends for demanding Epstein files; Flynn pivoted to demanding RussiaGate files.

Personally, I think none of the Q team lives on social media as they are too busy saving the world.

I could see Scavino being read in as he is Trump's right hand, but I don't believe any of the others are Q team.

• Klaus Schwab is left with nothing, and he won’t be happy

  8/6/2025, 10:38:08 AM · by ransomnote

  expose-news.com ^ | August 4, 2025 | Rhoda Wilson, George Christensen

There are trans people who say someone like that is not trans. They say when they became trans decades ago, it was painfully important that no one ever knew they were trans. They HAD to pass as the opposite sex and they never wanted anyone to know.

SO they point to exhibitionists - men with beards and makeup, gyrating like prostitutes - and they say those are not trans, but are people who are sexually gratified by envisioning themselves (dressing up) as women (autogynophelia).

That repulsive man in the video is not trying to hide or really, to pass. He’s enjoying sexual gratification as both an intact male and a drag woman, and slithering next to children satiates his need to get in people’s face (he’s extremely aggressive).

One of those perverts is Lily Tino (a male). He’s a major grifter, and loves to go to restaurants and get extremely offended if anyone calls him ‘sir’. He has been going into women’s bathrooms in Disneyland (dressed as an obvious man wearing makeup and women’s clothes) and photographing himself. He does it because he knows the women don’t want him there.

Some trans say he’s an intact male whose pictures are trophies of the women whose right to privacy he’s violated.
That one is now in legal trouble because he posted pics of women and a girl in those bathrooms. He’s pretending his feelings are hurt. I hope he goes to jail.

But the dancer is the most repulsive that has made it to a gif. I’m sure there are worse. And I do think they are simply predatory perverted males - whether they are ‘intact’ or not.

In VAERS, there are only about 26 cases of glioma, and the Covid 'vaccine' is associated with most of them. One entry is for an 'unkown' vaccine (no entry of vax name) but is dated 2021, so it is possibly another C19 glioma. One record for Gardisil is 2024, and it may be that the person was vaxxed for C19 but never reported for that one. Later when vaxxed for Gardisil, the glioma was reported - although I've heard horrible things about Gardisil, too.

From the 7/25/2025 release of VAERS data:

Found 26 cases where Symptom is Brain stem glioma or Glioma or Malignant glioma (Some people had more than one of the vaxes, so the total count is 30).

Government Disclaimer on use of this data

Table

 

Vaccine Type	Count
TOTAL	† 30
COVID-19	19
HPV	3
Varicella	1
Tetanus	1
Rotavirus	1
Pneumonia	1
Pertussis	1
Meningitis	1
Hepatitis A	1
Diphtheria	1

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled ADDRESSING THREATS TO THE UNITED STATES BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, marcusmaximus wrote:

Your Putin has 2 days to end his invasion.

Our Trump is doing everything he can to save the lives of Ukrainians for which Zelensky has no regard. Z and NATO will 'fight' down to the last Ukraine, Russia will oblige, and Trump is trying to save Ukrainian lives. I'm proud of our President Trump. Your Zelensky is a stupid thug.

There’s also deportation reducing student enrollment.

So you have no links or evidence - you just judge others (e.g., me) and sneer that we need to provide you with links instead. No need for me to verify your obvious problem.