Free Republic

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 03/01/2026 Vol.517, Q Day 3,047, meadsjn wrote:

'Cause I don't like using names on people doubles. I think we have a lot of words out there, so I took...now I call her, 'Beautiful Hillary'. It's a beautiful woman....*audience laughter* Lots of questions raised. How does an Old, Ugly, and Obesely Fat, Elderly Woman, already demonstrating neurological decline ... show up years later, looking like a 50-year-old, healthy, middle-aged woman. It doesn't work like that. Call me skeptical.

Yes - the neurological decline really stands in contrast to the double testifying last week. A version of Hilary, if alive today, would reflect years of litigation, adrenochrome deprivation and untamed rage at being constrained. POTUS just would not let her go her own way, kill/rape/eat children at her leisure.

The image at the following link is copyrighted so I can't post it, but you really gotta see it. It's supposedly Hillary Feb 14, 2026 at the 62 Munich Security Conference. It's still not HRC, but it's age appropriate double for Hillary.

https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/hillary-clinton-moderates-the-panel-talk-girls-just-want-to-news-photo/2261645860 

Here's a pic of another double at Trump's 2025 Inauguration.

https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/former-secretary-of-state-hillary-clinton-arrives-for-the-news-photo/2194358156?adppopup=true

The following double from 2024 looks like the one that testified last week.

https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/former-us-secretary-of-state-hillary-clinton-speaks-onstage-news-photo/2174251968?adppopup=true

 Some pics show her with a delighted smile on her face, like the one below when she's receiving the medal of honor from Biden. In my opinion, that smile has never been seen on the actual Hillary - too appreciative and innocent

https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/former-u-s-secretary-of-state-hillary-clinton-is-awarded-news-photo/2191835780?adppopup=true 

The last time I saw the real Hillary, she appeared to have a defibrillator on her back, was wearing a tent dress and she closely resembled George Soros at his eldest. She kept coughing in a serious-chronic-health-issue manner.

There's a meme around here with images of (sick looking) Soros and (sick looking) Hillary side by side. The similarity was disturbing.

Here's a post from 12/13/2019 featuring a Hillary double.

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q Anon: 12/13/19 Trust Trump’s Plan ~ Vol.198, Q Day 777, grey_whiskers wrote:

267 posted on 12/13/2019 7:25:19 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)   Hillary from 2019. Her doubles were taking over around that time so I don't know if it's her. I suspect Hillary was then becoming too ill and otherwise non-photogenic to continue attending public outings. The same would be true of Hollywood characters once deprived of their adrenochrome - no longer photogenic. 366 posted on 12/14/2019 6:59:03 AM PST by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)   A few images from 2017 - copyrighted so links only: 1. https://i.imgur.com/1XvbS3h.png ransomnote: I just realized the double who posed as Hillary at the hearing last week has hands far too young for her age. Her fingers appear to be average in length. In old 2017 photos, Hillary has hands which reflect her age and she appears to have smaller hands.   2. The image below is from the article/image of her wearing an orthopedic boot in 2017: https://i.imgur.com/B501d5E.png  https://www.itv.com/news/2017-10-18/hillary-clinton-praises-excellent-nhs-after-broken-toe-disrupts-uk-book-tour

When I originally captured that closeup view of her basking in the memory, the clip I captured ended right before she licks her lips.

The full clip is here.

In horror, I wondered if it was the memory of consuming flesh that made her lick her lips.

I went back and captured only that portion, just after she made the tell-tale gesture with her hands to her face.

I then went through the whole video to see if she normally does that as I do not recall that mannerism.

Here's one of the two other times she licks her lips.

It actually looks like the actor is wearing prosthetic teeth which extend past her own, so she has more of an overbite. I can see why  someone wearing prosthetics, particularly those which shift the lip line would make that lip-lick gesture.

And I am relieved it does not appear to be a display of her apetites for human flesh. 

The way she smiled when asked about the insurance file containing 'Frazzledrip' struck me as disquieting. Today, seeing it again, it reminded me of the smile of superiority Drew Barrymore displayed when she was indirectly asked about a restaurant in LA called The Cannibal Club. 

I recall reading about that club - it serves human flesh courtesy (they say) of donors who donate their own bodies.

When prodded to make a comment, Drew began smiling hard as if she was feeling glamorous, and she said, "We in Hollywood eat the best meat." She was holding back a laugh and her smile was disquieting. But perhaps it's that pairing of cannibalism with an adrenochrome which drives the smirking.'

Gah! I think I need to put my brain the washer for a soak! It's beyond my understanding but then, it SHOULD be beyond understanding.

So glad she's gone!

good post, thanks

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 03/01/2026 Vol.517, Q Day 3,047, thinden wrote:

I believe the actor at the Congressional hearing faithfully portrayed Hillary’s behavior at her actual trial, holding that imaginary child’s maimed face flesh to her own. Xxxxxxxxxxxxx They sure put emphasis on the hildabeast remembering the pleasure she felt

I suspect it was a faithful re-creation of the scene as it originally occurred.

The high adrenochrome users experience off the drug is said to be incomparable - no other experience comes close to the intense euphoria. I thought that pairing of adrenochrome induced euphoria with her own Satanic sensibilities etched that experience more fully in her mind than it otherwise would have.

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 03/01/2026 Vol.517, Q Day 3,047, rodguy911 wrote:

Ironically, in a way they are still at it. If you look at the image you ran Hillary is pushing 80 yet her face looks like she's early 50's or late 40's at the most. There is only one thing that does that: adrenochrome Here's what AI says about adrenochrome production: Adrenochrome is made by oxidizing adrenaline (epinephrine) using various oxidizing agents, such as silver oxide or persulfate, in a controlled environment. The process involves altering the molecular structure of adrenaline,(by torturing children) resulting in the formation of adrenochrome, which is then purified to ensure its quality. Here is my comment after reading the above BullSh_t! You forgot to mention that young children's' blood is also used.To get it to the right level for adrenochrome production children have to be tortured so their blood reaches the higest level for adrenochrome production. Here is the response from AI: I'm unable to engage with that topic. In other words AI will spit out exactly what they are programmed to do. In this case they made a bullsh_t case for how adrehochrome is made and pretending like it was just another drug that is commonly used. Instead of what it is. Made from the torture of childrens' blood. When challenged they backed off pretty quick since they know how it's really made. You can be sure Hillary looks like shes loaded up with it in the images you used. Six months from now without more adrenochrome she will look like the hag that she really is. Here she is without a recent does of adrenochrome,anyone see the difference? Once again "with" the recent dose of adrenochrome: We are dealing with the two faces of evil.

I can't follow your reasoning. Here's more of mine to add to my prior reasons here and here.

There's zero chance on Earth, or any of the other planets, that Trump would allow Hillary to continue to rape, torture and drink the blood of children he was president.

An actor portraying Hillary attended President Trump's inauguration. Hillary would not honor the president with her attendance. She hates him and wants him dead. She and Trump's other captured people sat in a special session at his inauguration. The MSM was relatively quiet about all those hard core lefties attending as 'special guests' of President Trump. People have been cancelled for far greater social sins that honoring Trump.

You said: If you look at the image you ran Hillary is pushing 80 yet her face looks like she's early 50's or late 40's at the most.

There is only one thing that does that:

Actually, body doubles are commonly used these days. Trump specifically said (Sep 2023) he doesn't like calling peoples doubles names. He's acknowledging that since July 2023, he gave up calling her 'Crooked Hillary.' Hillary is no more.

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 03/01/2026 Vol.517, Q Day 3,047, rodguy911 wrote:

At present, I believe she was probably executed July 4, 2023. NOt the first time I have seen that.Along with dozens of others who may be dead as well. For some reason gitmo appears to be cloning. I don't know what the deals are but when you read something over and over from different sources,at the very least you begin to wonder. Clones don't last forever. Although like everything else they may be getting better at it. In some cirecles hillary is well known to have been cloned several times.

I don't believe GITMO is cloning people. It's not a viable solution.

Mask technology is farther along then cloning technology. 

I have begun researching the purging of Satanists from Hollywood.

It's a complex topic because there would be a need to remove many of the pillars of the entertainment industry, and were full collapse and exposure to occur, the public would be significantly traumatized - entertainment is part of the warp and weft of cultural identity in America.

At first I wondered if Hollywood strikes were opportunities to make arrests. The more I looked into it, I wondered if those strikes were really opportunities to meet with industry survivors (people in entertainment who are not Satanists) to structure and rebuild the business, and provide the appearance of continuity to the public.

I asked GROK for a list of strikes in Hollywood since Trump first took office.

The first strike lasted almost a year and featured.....voice actors. 

I don't know, but it sure seems like excellent timing to screen, recruit and organize voice actors ahead of the 'show' in which social pillars will be replaced with mask wearing voice actors to ease the public into letting go of their 'American Idols'.

Just my 2 pesos.

Strike	Union(s) Involved	Duration	Key Issues
SAG-AFTRA Video Game Voice Actor Strike	SAG-AFTRA	October 21, 2016 – September 23, 2017 (340 days; continued for 8 months into Trump's term)	Residuals for voice actors in video games, performance bonuses, and workplace safety.
Writers Guild of America (WGA) Strike	WGA	May 2, 2023 – September 27, 2023 (148 days)	Streaming residuals, minimum staffing in writers' rooms, compensation increases, and protections against AI use in scriptwriting.
SAG-AFTRA Strike	SAG-AFTRA	July 14, 2023 – November 9, 2023 (118 days)	Streaming residuals, minimum pay increases, self-tape audition regulations, and AI protections for actors' likenesses and performances.

Note also that there was a strike in 2023 regarding AI protection for actors likenesses and performances. If AI was getting so good it was considered a commercial threat, couldn't featuring it as an issue signal that the appearance of actors and actresses, along with 'missing' Deep State players, is or has been supplemented with AI?

The public allowed a fake Biden to abuse the nation even though his eye color, stature, ear lobes and the shape of his head, jaw and and brow line varied from day to day. Oh, and he was clearly demented.

Masked voice actors and AI could handle the needs until the public eases away from removed Satanists who had essentially wearing the mask of humanity.

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 03/01/2026 Vol.517, Q Day 3,047, OldWarBaby wrote:

Gimmee a few minutes and I’ll remember the name of the gal we knew was a Hilliary double a few years back. At a bit of distance she was quite convincing and with a little makeup and coaching she could pass. I only remember her showing up when she wouldn’t have to speak but it’s not something I hang around looking for. My observations are just from letting the shop TeeVees run all the time.

Okay, there's Hillary's arrest on September 11, 2018 at the 9/11 memorial service to fit in here. Maybe they gave her leave to attend to portray situation normal and once there, they arrested her for the public to witness the arrest? Or, the first arrest was for charges coming from Saudi Arabia/Clinton Foundation and the second arrest potentially for the Insurance file/Frazzledrip. The woman was a crime industry.

I can accept that I may be off on the details - but I'm confident she's dead.

People have noted that Hillary attended the 9/11 service but Obama knew to 'stay away'. I think the White Hats didn't want to try to conceal two instances of heat exhaustion or other arrest cover at the 9/11 memorial.

But there is an attempt to show the public - if elites are arrested the public wants to see, and doesn't want elites in effect shielded from the public arrest.

The cameras were already in position at the Dec 5 funeral for George Bush Sr. They were there so that we could see the response of those who received an enevelope (and people had to explain it to Biden).

I wonder know if they contained a subpeona. If 'Subpeona to Appear' was printed in bold text at the top, there would be no need for them to read it while sitting in public, a glance would do. Hillary seemed to read her envelope - but I think she was already being processed through the legal system and this wasn't a true shock.

I think it was unpleasant shock for Barry and her/him. The wife actually read it while Obama seemed to blanche in fear/anger.

I think part of the anger in Mrs. Bush's expression is the audacity of White Hats serving Bush Jr. with a subpoena while they were attending Sr.'s funeral. 

But there's no need to assume they all received the same content. But we were meant to witness what we would otherwise miss due to security.

Perhaps Carter didn't receive a subpoena because, in my opinion, he cried his first day in office because the Deep State had 'the talk' with him, telling him he was installed and would function as their puppet. 

I don't believe Carter's weeping was about aliens or a crisis of faith. The Deep STate had priorities for Carter on day 1 and it wasn't aliens. They probably told him if he tried to escape the setup, he would experience an unfortunate assassination. They needed him to stay put and shut up.

Trump and Q have access to the same classified information as Carter, and they experienced no crisis in faith. Instead, Q+/Q urge us to pray and they demonstrate faith.

I now believe Hollywood's Ricky Gervaise exposure of elites during the awards show, calling them pedos etc., captured for the public the anger and fear elites experienced. Tom Hanks looked outraged - he was quite high in rank in the Satanic circle.

I think there was a time delay, possibly years - Gervaise's take down of pedos was broadcast after the fact. I can't figure out how/when, but I know once President Trump took office, all red carpet awards events in Hollywood ended.

Those red carpet awards ceremonies were in fact cover for big child trafficking events where elite buyers mingled with sellers, and sellers offered 'tasting' (child victims) to entice sales. So there were no Satanic actual awards ceremonies once Trump took office.

So we have examples to look at - we're being shown. Elites at the funeral, Hillary at the 9/11, Hollywood etc.

Exiled Iranian Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi says he has accepted the responsibility to lead a transition for Iran once the Islamic regime is removed. · 8h 🇮🇷🇺🇸THIS IS A HISTORIC MOMENT.
x.com ^ | March 6, 2026 | And We Know©🇺🇸 @andweknow

Posted on 3/6/2026, 7:32:47 PM by ransomnote

 

And We Know©

 

@andweknow

·

8h

 

 

 THIS IS A HISTORIC MOMENT.

Exiled Iranian Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi says he has accepted the responsibility to lead a transition for Iran once the Islamic regime is removed.

“The Iranian people have called on me to lead the transition after the regime is gone. I have accepted that responsibility.”

He says the goal is an orderly transition, national stability, and letting Iranians decide their future through the ballot box.

For millions of Iranians who have waited decades for this possibility… this is emotional.

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 03/01/2026 Vol.517, Q Day 3,047, OldWarBaby wrote:

Gimmee a few minutes and I’ll remember the name of the gal we knew was a Hilliary double a few years back. At a bit of distance she was quite convincing and with a little makeup and coaching she could pass. I only remember her showing up when she wouldn’t have to speak but it’s not something I hang around looking for. My observations are just from letting the shop TeeVees run all the time.

GROK sez:

Teresa Barnwell, a professional impersonator who has been mimicking Hillary Clinton since the early 1990s, is the woman frequently cited in anonymous online discussions and conspiracy research as her near-identical lookalike or alleged body double.

I wonder how HIllary liked the weather?

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 03/01/2026 Vol.517, Q Day 3,047, OldWarBaby wrote:

The thing that’s always stuck with me about Hilliary in that 2018 time frame is that she was an overweight, ill-kempt, ill-mannered, waddling slob. In a matter of months she then appeared slimmed down, bright eyed, neatly dressed and even sort of civil. She appeared to have dropped around 30 pounds in a matter of months.. And the thing we’re seeing now is way closer to how she looked when they lived in the white hut. And now her interaction with Bill seems way different? Probly just me?

Not just you. During Trump's first term, she what some anons speculated was a defibrillator under baggy clothing. Her complexion and dull eyes reflected grim, poisonous determination amid failing health. She was graceless, harsh and bitter.

The actor who portrayed her at the Congressional hearing has a grace and vitality about her - she was not the sick, adrenochrome starved coarse Hillary we recall.

The White Hats would note the disparity between the two women (youth, age, grace) and could have aged the actor's appearance with makeup and other stagecraft, but they didn't.

The White Hats wanted anons to know this was not Hillary. Fans of Hillary will approve the actor's portrayal - her improved appearance and almost light hearted delivery.

Trump wanted anons to know when he spoke about the 'great day' in which he stopped calling her body doubles 'Crooked Hillary.'

I think there's a Truth of Trump wherein he says Biden is not the same man, and even one in which he flatly says Biden is dead.

They've given us signs all along. Biden's mask curling up the back of his neck. He changed height to a ridiculous degree. Hillary changed in height too.

The MATRIXX (MSM) has been hard on us - if the MSM doesn't say it's real, or denounces it as conspiracy theory, then Biden can become 5 inches taller after exiting a building.

It's not just indoctrination. It's often basic decency to project some fragment of morals onto reality to the point where on some level, the suspension of disbelief separates us from knowing just how evil and cruel the Black Hats are. 

A manager I worked for continued to humor an abusive manager despite my requests for help. When he finally accepted the manager was devious and abusive, he apologized to me and said he just kept projecting what he himself would do in such a situation and couldn't conceive of anyone behaving in such a petty, cruel, destructive manner instead of actually working.

I believe the actor at the Congressional hearing faithfully portrayed Hillary's behavior at her actual trial, holding that imaginary child's maimed face flesh to her own.

Regarding the death of Hillary Clinton post, I'm adding to my 'connecting' excerpt below (itallics) a portion I previously forgot:

Trump went to Saudi Arabia exactly 4 months after taking office (May 20, 2017). Saudi Arabia was the largest sex trafficking hub in the world and Hillary's Clinton Foundation was the largest supplier of trafficked children to that hub.

While in Saudia Arabia, Q+/Q were able to collect enough information to arrest Hillary for Clinton Foundation dealings.

Four months later, October 15-16, 2017, Hillary missed a scheduled BBC Woman's Hour radio interview and other appearances and was seen wearing an orthopedic boot. Maybe nothing, maybe something (e.g., arrest).

Two weeks later on October 28, 2017, Q posted the first drop, kickstarting the Q movement. It makes sense that they had to arrest her before they launched the Q movement.

Prior to Q's arrival, the Deep State was not aware of the threat they posed. They probably believed rumors of a White Hat adversary were a conspiracy theory.

That level of operation stealth over the years is amazing, a wonder in its own right. Protected by God, certainly.

That had to be the mother-of-all-surprise-attacks (MOASA?).

The Black Hats had indoctrinated a huge chunk of the population, controlled almost all media and had taken over 70% of the American government at a time when it was  believed less than 5% of the public or government was needed, historically, to force regime change.

Once Q went public on 4ch, the 'Queen' Satanist would be protected by so many, and their best chance for the most 'clean' arrest (minimizing collateral) would be lost. Had they not obtained her, the start of the Q movement would be delayed. NCSWIC

Alternatives: The drops say she would be arrested, Trump later said, "I heard Hillary was going to be arrested, why wasn't she?"

I think his statements were likely disinfo cover. But there's a chance ...well there are alternatives, and the drop saying the FBI would cease to exist if a certain person were detained. But given Q shifts the release of information from the actual date of occurence, I don't favor one alternative over another.

I don't believe they would go public until they captured the 'Queen'.

Once captured, surely there were threats (e.g., FBI) to try to force her release. Q said they were, "under threat of kill every second of the day."

Q1746 [Jul 28, 2018] excerpted.

Hillary is gone. 

Grok's review of anon opinion on Q hubs held that Hillary and those Satanists sacrificing children were trying to ascend to become immortal gods. If prevented from sacrificing children, they would never ascend and would instead cease to exist when they died.

Hillary had plenty of time to contemplate the the loss of the 2016 presidency, her elite status, her health, her protectors, her wealth, her freedom, her immortality and her path to becoming a god. She never expected to lose. 

Today, I think the remaining outposts of Operation Mockingbird are terrified that Frazzledrip or some other Kryptonite level information is about to be dropped because of the tone of the news - it's the type they use to distract.

If you look at Drudge Report right now, it's nuke threats [Iran threatens to nuke Tel Aviv] and Russia Russia Russia!

 

Drudge also has warped red-letter ledes accusing Trump of abusing a child, and the following icon on top of hysterical jobs reporting (lies).

 

On my monitor, the fear emoji above is displayed the same size as it appears on Drudge.

Prayers up for those in harms way around the world. The scraps of the Cabal are fighting for their lives. Zelensky threatened Orban and cut off oil to a few NATO members to prevent them from blocking access to more money.

They withdrew insurance from the Strait of Hormuz and Trump responded by supplying the needed insurance. The war is so much harder for the Deep State to hide now (picturing those seated during Trump's inauguration).

May God shield and protect Trump, his warriors, all patriots and all innocents the Deep State would like to harm.

God is good.

GOD WON!

The mop up stage continues, but the worst battles are won.

I asked GROK to remind me about a statement it cited regarding the percentage required for regime change.

GROK: The most commonly cited "rule of thumb" for regime change via mass nonviolent resistance (protests, civil disobedience) is the 3.5% rule, from political scientist Erica Chenoweth's research.

The theory states that once around 3.5% of a country's population actively and sustainedly participates in nonviolent campaigns against a government, success in forcing major political change (including toppling the regime) becomes essentially inevitable—historically, no such campaign has failed once hitting that threshold.

This theory gets brought up a lot in conspiracy-adjacent or anti-establishment discussions as a kind of "minimum effective opposition" benchmark, sometimes flipped to argue how little it takes to resist or overthrow a captured system.

Separately, in coup literature (military or elite-led seizures of power), there's no single universal "5%" figure for government capture, but related ideas float around: Coups often succeed with control over a relatively small but critical portion of the military/security apparatus (e.g., key units in the capital, communications, or elite forces), not the whole army.

Some older analyses or informal rules of thumb suggested that neutralizing or winning over roughly 5–10% of the armed forces (or a comparable small elite fraction) could be enough if the rest stays neutral/passive, especially in weakly institutionalized governments.

In discussions of "institutional capture" (like deep state theories), people sometimes paraphrase that "it only takes a small percentage [often 1–5%] of key bureaucrats, intelligence officials, or insiders to effectively control or subvert a government from within," especially in large bureaucracies where most people follow orders.

You might have been blending the 3.5% nonviolent threshold with a rough "5%" for elite/military/institutional capture in coup scenarios.

Q and Q+ have rewritten the rules. AI certainly changes the landscape as well.

\

For my part, I believe Hillary Clinton is dead, executed for crimes against humanity.

The moment I came to that conclusion 2 nights  ago, the tension in my back and neck abruptly relaxed and I fell into a deep sleep after battling long term insomnia for months.

At present, I believe she was probably executed July 4, 2023.

TRANSCRIPT BEGINS~~~~
Trump: We won an election that everyone said couldn't be won.

We beat Hillary Clinton. You know I used to call her 'Crooked Hillary.'

I'd say, 'Crooked Hillary,' but I took that name away from her.

That was a great day. About 2 months ago, I said, 'You know what?'

'Cause I don't like using names on people doubles. I think we have a lot of words out there, so I took...now I call her, 'Beautiful Hillary'. It's a beautiful woman....*audience laughter*

END OF TRANSCRIPT~~~~

Two months prior to Trump's speech at the Pray Vote Stand Summit would have been July, and Q/Q+ never miss a moment of symbolism in the restoration of our republic.

I checked for noteworthy events and read that July 4, 2023, at least 20 people were killed and 126 injured in 22 mass shootings across the United States.

I asked GROK about the records for shootings on July 4.

Notable Mass Shootings on July 4 Before 2023

There have been several high-profile and deadly incidents on or around the holiday in prior years:

• July 4, 2022 — Highland Park, Illinois parade shooting: A gunman opened fire from a rooftop during an Independence Day parade, killing 7 people and wounding 48 others (many by bullets or shrapnel). This received widespread national attention and was commemorated in later years.
• Other years have seen clusters of incidents, though not always one massive event. For instance, analyses show dozens of mass shootings (4+ victims) accumulated on July 4 across years like 2019–2022, often at parties or gatherings rather than parades

I think the Deep State may have been using the shootings to 'warn' the White Hats to let her go or clear her of charges.

There were times that Hillary displayed such a marked decline in health, which I believe was in part due to removal of her ability to literally drain the life out of children, many anons were speculating that she was too ill to run in 2020.

Her access to adrenochrome and children's blood would never have been restored and she would have continued to deteriorate.

I initially considered that the video of her testimony was from 2021, when Boebert first took office. But Hillary's mental condition after years of litigation and lack of access to child sacrifices would have taken their toll and she would have continued her decline.

She appeared at public events with unkempt hair, little makeup and rumpled baggy clothing. I believe those were the years she was indicted, arrested and sentenced. I posted a GROK report on anon opinion about her health here.

I am working on matching her health decline and abrupt rejuvenation, (e.g.,Trump's remark that he doesn't like to insult 'people's doubles) to the time required from investigation, grand jury, arrest, trial and sentencing (GROK report).

I think her last public appearance was possibly in 2019, after which time she was appeared healthier and more youthful.

So far, I find the optics, Hillary's condition and the required prosecution timetable compatible.

I believe Hillary was haggard and experiencing the effects of adrenochrome withdrawal, because they just wouldn't serve her monstrous predilections, starting around October of 2017, when her external appearance first began to resemble her actual witch core.

I believe she may have been arrested September 11, 2018 (thrown in the Scooby mobile).

She may have been last seen in 2019, after which time she was seen looking healthier and more youthful.

Trump went to Saudi Arabia exactly 4 months after taking office (May 20, 2017). Saudi Arabia was the largest sex trafficking hub in the world and Hillary's Clinton Foundation was the largest supplier of trafficked children to that hub.

While in Saudia Arabia, Q+/Q were able to collect enough information to arrest Hillary for Clinton Foundation dealings.

Four months later, October 15-16, 2017, Hillary missed a scheduled BBC Woman's Hour radio interview and other appearances and was seen wearing an orthopedic boot. Maybe nothing, maybe something (e.g., arrest).

Per Grok's report, Anons claimed her fall and subsequent "disheveled" look (e.g., rushed hairstyle, less makeup during rescheduled interviews) proved ongoing neurological issues or frailty, making her "too ill to run." I think it points to removal of adrenochrome and shock/duress of the 'nooses' part of her concerns when she first learned Trump won the election.

November 22, 2017, Jeff Sessions quietly retained Huber. He only spoke about the appointment March 29, 2018.

Researching GROK, grand juries can take 18 to 24 months, and that's for large cases likely smaller than Clinton's web of crime.

The grand jury and sealed indictments keep information away from the public. The Congressional hearings can take place

We've been told from the very beginning we're watching a movie, enjoy the show, and the 'the stage' must be set.

Q461
Jan 04, 2018 12:54:28 AM EST
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: aaefa5 No. 11115887

What makes a movie GOOD?
GREAT ACTORS?
Q

I don't believe, if she were alive today, that Hillary would look as healthy, relaxed and expressive as the actor portraying her in the hearing. Given that the hearing portion featuring the Clintons was pre-recorded and was not live, that may be footage from Boebert's questioning a few years ago.

I believe all the original trial footage exists, and that the person portraying Hillary at the Congressional hearing a few days ago viewed the recordings and, with practice ahead of time, accurately recreated Hillary's warped, Satanic behavior from a few years prior.

Hillary is not the only elite monster arrested, tried, convicted and 'no longer with us.' Likely all of Trump's 'captives' attending his 2025 inauguration were actors, as those who draw sustenance from the suffering of children could no longer obtain it, and would not be fit for PR duties.

I think some guilty of lesser crimes (fraud, money laundering etc.) could receive lesser sentences and/or be cooperating, for now.

190 Nov 22, 2017

 158 Nov 20, 2017 (EXCERPTED)

879
Mar 08, 2018 4:45:35 PM EST
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 2f9ca6 No. 591304
“SET THE STAGE.” - POTUS
Do you believe?
Buckle up.
Q

I think the actors are on stage and the public is being gently awakened.

Recently Elon Musk posted that the stage must be set, and since then there's an uptick in anon chatter about the phrase on x.com.

It seems new episodes are heading our way, but we already knew that from the busy news cycle.

I suspect the public will be shown less than many expect, but the choice to know is still ours. And may the children be spared this darkness until they are older.

Prayers and blessings for all those who sacrificed to bring us justice. All glory to God for granting us triumph over the evil known as Hillary Clinton, and her peers.

 

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 03/01/2026 Vol.517, Q Day 3,047, Melian wrote:

Re Frazzledrip Perhaps they could stop the video amid the child’s screams just as Huma or Hilliary is raising her hand to the child. I think they should keep the sound going for another minute. I fear some liberals will only be convinced by seeing the violence. I seem to recall it was Huma who did the actual violence to the child. So people would have to see Hillary’s face/participation to believe it of her.

I don't know if I could bear the child's screams, or those of anyone in the presence of demons (recalling my unfortunate attempt to listen to the Podesta torture audio - this is probably the 'Skippy' recording).

Children will see whatever is provided. After the trauma of lockdowns etc., delays in school, depression and now, they will find ways to view the content. Gah! 

Re Frazzledrip, Some of us read that the 'ladies' sawed that kid's face off with a vegetable peeler, Hillary taking over what Huma started, and then Hillary 'wore' the face as a mask. I have to hope in my heart that the child did not see Hillary wearing her bloody face. The pain - surely the pain and shock would render her unconscious?!!

I do believe the analysis that Hillary reveled in the memory of torturing the child in her hearing testimony, putting her hands to her face as donning the child's face.

 

So maybe by putting her testimony out showing her creepy demeanor, the released video excerpt mostly needs to tie her testimony behavior to her torture behavior - that would be horrific enough to see Hillary glorying in the terror of a child. Stills would do it, or provide a still indicating what's going on and a clip of just Hillary's enjoyment.

I wonder if it's just too much to release a direct video clip. 80% will never be known/shown lest most people end up in the hospital.

Is getting 'Frazzledrip' on the Congressional record enough? So those who 'choose to know' are told the rumors are true? Then some of those (MAGA) in government who witness a 'safe' but shocking portion of the video can attest to it? Thereby saving the public the visual/audio. 

Seems knowledge and witness account would be sufficient, and spare the kids.

Thinking here that this is all just the tip of the iceberg of 'elite' behavior. Glad so many of us will never have to witness the whole. Prayers up for shattered hearts and peace of mind for those who served - and sacrificed investigating all this.

I asked GROK to search Anon hubs for their comments about Hillary Clinton's health. Between October 2017 to Dec 2019, she was seen in very poor health, sometimes with little makeup and unkempt hair, wearing baggy clothing etc. Here's Grok's report.

Based on searches across QAnon-adjacent discussions on X (formerly Twitter), archived 8kun threads, and web articles documenting conspiracy theories during Donald Trump's first term (January 20, 2017–January 20, 2021), anons speculated multiple times about Hillary Clinton's health based on her public appearances, often claiming her "unkempt" or "unpolished" look (e.g., disheveled hair, minimal makeup, or baggy pantsuits/coats) indicated severe illness that would prevent her from running for office again. These rumors built on pre-2017 theories but peaked around specific sightings or events where her attire was interpreted as hiding medical devices (e.g., braces, defibrillators) or showing fatigue/decline. While you recalled two occasions, I found evidence of three primary clusters of speculation tied to public events or sightings. Below are the dates of peak anon discussions, the associated public appearances/events, and brief context from the rumors.1. October 15–16, 2017 (Speculation Peak: Mid-October 2017)

• Public Event/Sighting: During her UK book tour for "What Happened" (released September 2017), Clinton fell on stairs at her London hotel on October 15, breaking her toe. This caused her to miss a scheduled BBC Woman's Hour radio interview and other appearances, though she later appeared in a boot at events like the Southbank Centre Literature Festival (October 15) and Cheltenham Literature Festival (October 16).
• Anon Speculation: Anons claimed her fall and subsequent "disheveled" look (e.g., rushed hairstyle, less makeup during rescheduled interviews) proved ongoing neurological issues or frailty, making her "too ill to run." Posts dismissed the broken toe as a cover for a seizure or collapse, tying it to 2016 pneumonia rumors. Discussions on 8kun and X (e.g., Paul Joseph Watson's post) amplified this, with some saying her pantsuit hid injuries or devices.

@PrisonPlanet

2. May 7–8, 2018 (Speculation Peak: Early May 2018)

• Public Event/Sighting: Clinton was photographed in New York City on May 7 in warm (80°F) weather wearing a long coat, scarf, and loose pantsuit while visiting her daughter Chelsea's apartment. This followed a March 2018 trip to India where she fell twice (once on stairs, once in a bathtub, fracturing her wrist).
• Anon Speculation: Anons pointed to a "weird protrusion" under her coat as evidence of a back brace or medical device, claiming her baggy clothing hid injuries from chronic illness, making her unfit to run in 2020. Rumors on X and 8kun linked this to "declining health," with satire posts (e.g., about prepping for a "senior pageant" but looking unwell) mocking her hairstyle and overall "unpolished" vibe as signs of weakness.

dailymail.co.uk +1

3. December 11–23, 2019 (Speculation Peak: Mid-December 2019)

• Public Event/Sighting: During her tour for "The Book of Gutsy Women" (co-authored with Chelsea Clinton, released October 2019), she appeared at multiple U.S. and UK events in loose, baggy tops and pantsuits. Key sightings include a December 12 Broadway visit to "Ain't Too Proud" (where photos showed "youthful" but "altered" makeup/hairstyle) and a late-November/early-December panel (photo from a "Gutsy" event showing a polka-dot "tent-like" top).
• Anon Speculation: Anons claimed her "tent" outfits hid defibrillators or other equipment, with coughing fits during sparse-crowd talks proving she was "on a knife edge" health-wise and couldn't run. Posts mocked her "bad plastic surgery" (implying desperate attempts to look healthy) and "unkempt" appearance as evidence of terminal illness or decline.

These speculations were baseless, often debunked by medical explanations (e.g., injuries from falls), but persisted in QAnon circles as "proof" of hidden ailments. No credible evidence supported claims of illness preventing political activity. If these don't match your recollection, provide more details for refinement.