Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Female molecular geneticist at UC Berkeley debate nails the reason so many women are in fear of trans women in changing rooms and prisons: 'Women have internalized misogyny to the point where the man's comfort takes precedence over the woman's safety'
UK Daily Mail ^ | August 24 2022 | ANDREA CAVALLIER

Posted on 08/24/2022 1:38:13 PM PDT by knighthawk

A female molecular geneticist participating in a UC Berkeley debate argued that trans women are not women and should not be legally treated as such, citing examples of women's safety fears of trans women in changing rooms and prisons.

The geneticist argued that legally treating trans women as women, and allowing them into changing rooms and prisons, means women have put a man's comfort ahead of their own safety - claiming that the behavior of men is inherently different than that of women.

'Women have internalized misogyny to the point where the man's comfort takes precedence over the woman's safety,' she said. 'This is the most insane thing that has happened in my life, that women are a feeling now.'

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: berkeley; chat; female; homosexualagenda; trans; transgender
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 08/24/2022 1:38:14 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

A rose by any other name would smell as sweet.


2 posted on 08/24/2022 1:41:40 PM PDT by Scarlett156 (Carol's been here. ~~ Sheriff Rick Grimes in TV version of "The Walking Dead")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Or it could be because most trannies still have their wedding tackle.


3 posted on 08/24/2022 1:43:05 PM PDT by EvilCapitalist (81 million votes my ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

“Women have internalized misogyny to the point where the man’s comfort takes precedence over the woman’s safety,’ she said. ‘This is the most insane thing that has happened in my life, that women are a feeling now.’”

Is it because I’m a mere male that I am unable to make any sense of this statement?


4 posted on 08/24/2022 1:43:07 PM PDT by enumerated ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
There are people with original thought at Lawrence Livermore. Beyond that, at Berkeley, it's not very impressive.
5 posted on 08/24/2022 1:44:24 PM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: enumerated
Is it because I’m a mere male that I am unable to make any sense of this statement?

I don't get it either. It seems to be saying that trannies are really men and that women are not afraid of them because of the patriarchy or...something?

6 posted on 08/24/2022 1:45:41 PM PDT by Sans-Culotte (11/3-11/4/2020 - The USA became a banana republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Try this word: misandry


7 posted on 08/24/2022 1:47:15 PM PDT by keving (We the government )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Makes

No

Sense

NONE


8 posted on 08/24/2022 1:47:33 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

I think that she is saying that women have internalized so deeply the opinion/feeling/fact (you pick) that men are so much more important than women that avoiding causing them any discomfort is more important than their personal safety. Hard to argue with that. Their silence is deafening.


9 posted on 08/24/2022 1:50:43 PM PDT by calljack (Sometimes your worst nightmare is just a start.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: enumerated

The reason you can’t read the sense of that statement is that it is senseless.

Leftist thought has so beguiled and appropriated the thought process of the majority of women [present company on the Forum exempted] they are unable to recognize plain “threat aversion” is the cause of their discomfort. They know that these people are mentally ill in the great majority and that they are stupid to accept this whole stupid inverted culture. They just can’t admit it.


10 posted on 08/24/2022 1:51:10 PM PDT by KC Burke (If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

It’s simpler than that. Most men can kill a woman with their bare hands. Women are correct to be fearful around an obviously insane man. And trannies are obviously insane.


11 posted on 08/24/2022 1:53:49 PM PDT by Seruzawa ("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

“women have put a man’s comfort ahead of their own safety “

Agreed

I would qualify that statemnet with a “Psuedo” or “Fake” women have . . .

That is an out-of-the-park shot, an excellent way to make the case.


12 posted on 08/24/2022 1:56:58 PM PDT by Macoozie (Handcuffs and Orange Jumpsuits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

“internalized misogyny”

That might be a contributing factor, but I suspect it is a small influence. The women know the situation in universities today. They know they are doomed if they speak up against the lunacy. They know if they speak up they will most likely be kicked off the sports team, booted out of the university, and have their budding careers ruined.

It takes a very strong person to buck that tide, but we are starting to see a few such strong ones.


13 posted on 08/24/2022 1:59:02 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“May your neighbors respect you, trouble neglect you, angels protect you and heaven accept you”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: enumerated

The author is saying that women have been beaten so hard, so frequently, and so mercilessly by men all their lives that they will acquiesce to anything a man does to them. They are acting like a beaten dog.

It is BS. It gives women no credit.


14 posted on 08/24/2022 2:00:21 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“May your neighbors respect you, trouble neglect you, angels protect you and heaven accept you”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: enumerated
#4. It means it is women's fault they are afraid that the comfort of trans men who identify as women takes precedence over women's safety.

Which the way I was raised, is a sexist and misogynistic way to look at the issue. That was before political correctness turned meanings of words upside down.

15 posted on 08/24/2022 2:04:06 PM PDT by Widget Jr (Disobey your television.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: enumerated; All

I watched the video. She doesn’t make those two statements at the same time. That’s why they don’t make sense together.

The writer(s) put those two statements together. The molecular geneticist didn’t.

Sure, she might be making an argument from a feminist point of view.

But, those statements make more sense, separately, in proper context, the way she put them.


16 posted on 08/24/2022 2:07:57 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

I’m guessing this means that the “women” who matter (biological men pretending to be women) are not catered to by biological women because mere biological women have been conditioned to hate women, and this hate extends to the most women of women (men who pretend to be women).

The left is more and more perverse and convoluted in its thinking.

Notice how the left is trying to make biological women almost disappear. The only “women” they care about are the Trans guys.


17 posted on 08/24/2022 2:07:57 PM PDT by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: enumerated

“Is it because I’m a mere male that I am unable to make any sense of this statement?”

It doesn’t make sense when taken out of context. Watch the video. She is arguing against transgenderism.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1562119417131110400


18 posted on 08/24/2022 2:18:51 PM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (I went to bed on November 3rd 2020 and woke up in 1984.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: enumerated

She is referring to women who support men in the woman’s locker room just because the men say they belong there, and they don’t want to commit any micro aggressions against them. These women think so little of themselves that they are willing to put themselves and their sisters at risk. Get it now?


19 posted on 08/24/2022 2:22:09 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

It’s absolutely beyond belief that anyone thinks it okay for biological males to invade women’s locker rooms or rest rooms. Leave the ladies alone


20 posted on 08/24/2022 2:24:44 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Freedom isn't free, liberty isn't liberal and you'll never find anything Right on the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson