Posted on 07/13/2016 10:59:43 AM PDT by i88schwartz
At a campaign event in Springfield, Illinois Wednesday afternoon presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton warned Donald Trump would use the military and IRS "to go after his critics and opponents."
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
A Couple Of Flashbacks To Bill Clinton’s Audits
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/a-couple-of-flashbacks-to-bill-clintons-audits
Translation: “Don’t vote for Trump, he’ll do the same thing we have been doing for years!”
This is exactly what the Clintons did. In addition, they had the FBI collect info on their opponents. (And Lois Lerner is at this moment still not charged.)
Yes, Clinton is telegraphing what she would do to Americans is she won the presidency.
Or, he could use the FBI and DOJ to cover up his crimes and lies!! Think of the outrage!
HILLARY WINS THE CHUTZPAH AWARD!!!!!
She is not campaigning. She is spreading pure poison. I have never heard a candidate say such accusations against a fellow American. She has no program. She is merely attacking with one irrational statement after another. It borders on incoherence. Hillary must be terrified she is losing.
I fully demand that he uses the IRS like the Dems did against the Tea Party!! Get ready!!
Did Bill Clinton turn IRS into Gestapo?
'Secret police agency' used to intimidate, harass, exact revenge
Ds are going to hate a lot of Obama’s precedents the next time we have an R president. The current R congress probably will also.
The chutzpah to say such a thing!
You mean like Obama, Elijah Cummings, and the rest of the leftist goons went after the Tea Party and other Conservative organizations..Poor Hillary, must suck to be stuck on stupid
Remember when Hillary was found to possess the personal FBI files of hundreds of her political enemies while she occupied the White House as First Lady? Yeah kinda like that...
For Hillary Clinton to take this stance about the necessity for a President to "uphold and defend" the Constitution is pathetic, given the degree to which she and her husband and their Party have abandoned that Constitution's principles and provisions!
For her to refer to the "land of Lincoln" and to Lincoln himself reminds me of the following Letter written by that great defender of the "principles" of the Constitution:
"In this "all honor to Jefferson" letter, Abraham Lincoln declines an invitation to speak in Boston at a birthday celebration honoring Thomas Jefferson. His letter, however, may have been intended to be read at the event. The letter contains familiar arguments which Lincoln used in speeches during the late 1850s, including an allusion to Euclid. It is loaded with quotable remarks, such as "he would would be no slave, must consent to have no slave." In one of the most thought-provoking passages, Lincoln praises Jefferson's foresight and wisdom evident in his planting an abstract truth in the Declaration of Independence, "applicable to all men and all times."
Springfield, Ills, April 6, 1859Shame on you, Hillary Clinton! Do not use the name of this great man in your dishonest quest to gain power.Messrs. Henry L. Pierce, & others.
Gentlemen
Your kind note inviting me to attend a Festival in Boston, on the 13th. Inst. in honor of the birth-day of Thomas Jefferson, was duly received. My engagements are such that I can not attend.
Bearing in mind that about seventy years ago, two great political parties were first formed in this country, that Thomas Jefferson was the head of one of them, and Boston the head-quarters of the other, it is both curious and interesting that those supposed to descend politically from the party opposed to Jefferson should now be celebrating his birthday in their own original seat of empire, while those claiming political descent from him have nearly ceased to breathe his name everywhere.
Remembering too, that the Jefferson party were formed upon its supposed superior devotion to the personal rights of men, holding the rights of property to be secondary only, and greatly inferior, and then assuming that the so-called democracy of to-day, are the Jefferson, and their opponents, the anti-Jefferson parties, it will be equally interesting to note how completely the two have changed hands as to the principle upon which they were originally supposed to be divided. The democracy of to-day hold the liberty of one man to be absolutely nothing, when in conflict with another man's right of property. Republicans, on the contrary, are for both the man and the dollar; but in cases of conflict, the man before the dollar.
I remember once being much amused at seeing two partially intoxicated men engage in a fight with their great-coats on, which fight, after a long, and rather harmless contest, ended in each having fought himself out of his own coat, and into that of the other. If the two leading parties of this day are really identical with the two in the days of Jefferson and Adams, they have perfomed the same feat as the two drunken men.
But soberly, it is now no child's play to save the principles of Jefferson from total overthrow in this nation.
One would start with great confidence that he could convince any sane child that the simpler propositions of Euclid are true; but, nevertheless, he would fail, utterly, with one who should deny the definitions and axioms. The principles of Jefferson are the definitions and axioms of free society.
And yet they are denied and evaded, with no small show of success.
One dashingly calls them "glittering generalities"; another bluntly calls them "self evident lies"; and still others insidiously argue that they apply only to "superior races."
These expressions, differing in form, are identical in object and effect--the supplanting the principles of free government, and restoring those of classification, caste, and legitimacy. They would delight a convocation of crowned heads, plotting against the people. They are the van-guard--the miners, and sappers--of returning despotism.
We must repulse them, or they will subjugate us.
This is a world of compensations; and he who would be no slave, must consent to have no slave. Those who deny freedom to others, deserve it not for themselves; and, under a just God, can not long retain it.
All honor to Jefferson--to the man who, in the concrete pressure of a struggle for national independence by a single people, had the coolness, forecast, and capacity to introduce into a merely revolutionary document, an abstract truth, applicable to all men and all times, and so to embalm it there, that to-day, and in all coming days, it shall be a rebuke and a stumbling-block to the very harbingers of re-appearing tyranny and oppression.
Your obedient Servant
A. Lincoln--
Hillary is trying to sell her software and procedures for using the IRS and other government agencies to destroy someone?
Pro-jection!
She should substitute her name and that of the crooked foundation for opponents and she would be 100% right.
Projection. She KNOWS that is what she would do so she projects that upon Trump.
Project much?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.