Skip to comments.
Scientists Back Off of Ardi Claims (Evos give climate-hoaxers a run for their money...LOL!)
ICR News ^
| December 4, 2009
| Brian Thomas, M.S.
Posted on 12/04/2009 8:07:39 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
In May 2009, a remarkably well-preserved extinct primate, nicknamed Ida, was hailed as one of the most important fossil finds ever. It had features that some interpreted as a link between two primate body forms. At the time, ICR News suggested that its evolutionary significance was far overblown, predicting that the scientific consensus would offer retractions. Those retractions came three months later, confirming that the fossil―called Darwinius―was really just an extinct lemur variety...
(Excerpt) Read more at icr.org ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: New York; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: absolutenonsense; anobsoletetheory; anthropology; antiscience; ardi; ardipithecus; baptist; belongsinreligion; bovinescat; bs; btmspussout; carboncretins; catastrophism; catholic; christian; christianity; christianright; churchofdarwin; climatechange; corruption; creation; creationdeniers; crevolist; cruminals; darwin; darwinius; darwinliedpeopledied; darwinsfantasy; devolution; embarrasschristians; evangelical; evilution; evoisnotscience; evolution; forrestisstoopid; fossilrecord; fossils; genesis; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; globalwhoring; godlessgunlessgutles; godsgravesglyphs; ida; idafraud; intelligentdesign; judaism; lemur; lucy; lutheran; lyingggeologist; manmonkeymyth; moralabsolutes; motleycru; notasciencetopic; origins; paleontology; propellerbeanie; protestant; ragingyechardon; religiousbigotry; religiousright; science; secularmythology; spammer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360 ... 661-666 next last
To: count-your-change
“But then who would we laugh at?”
No, they have an agenda and that wouldn’t keep them out but that was a funny post!
God bless.
GG
321
posted on
12/04/2009 11:35:10 AM PST
by
Gordon Greene
(www.fracturedrepublic.com - I have a theory about how Darwin evolved... more soon.)
To: ColdWater
And Cold Water, slips not so silently into irrelevance....
322
posted on
12/04/2009 11:35:31 AM PST
by
RoadGumby
(Ask me about Ducky)
To: RoadGumby
It worked for Thomas Jefferson and George Washington.
323
posted on
12/04/2009 11:35:43 AM PST
by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: RoadGumby
And Cold Water, slips not so silently into irrelevance....I guess that is why you have posted to me a zillion times ...
324
posted on
12/04/2009 11:36:45 AM PST
by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: Natural Law; editor-surveyor
You can't even define or specify what constitutes a transitional fossil. All you and the YEC's do is reject the entire fossil database as not being compliant to your unspecified standard. If you have a better definition, or even a definition, go for it. Something more specific than *They're all transitionals* would be nice.
325
posted on
12/04/2009 11:36:52 AM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: count-your-change
“Amazing, isn’t it? But there are others waiting in the wings to take Ardis place. Maybe something like Kenyanthropus, consisting of parts of a skull.
Eve was constructed from Adam’s rib but the Darwinist’s claim to be able to create a whole zoo of swinging, limping, knuckle dragging critters from even less. Of course it does take lots of glue and grinding”
Another fabulous post... I bow to your superior evolution barbs!
Wish the evo’s were that clever. Sure would make for better reading.
326
posted on
12/04/2009 11:36:56 AM PST
by
Gordon Greene
(www.fracturedrepublic.com - I have a theory about how Darwin evolved... more soon.)
To: ColdWater
Avery Dulles, a leading Catholic theologian reports, "In his college years at William and Mary, [Jefferson] came to admire Francis Bacon, Isaac Newton, and John Locke as three great paragons of wisdom. Under the influence of several professors, he converted to the deist philosophy."[6] Dulles concludes: In summary, then, Jefferson was a deist because he believed in one God, in divine providence, in the divine moral law, and in rewards and punishments after death; but did not believe in supernatural revelation. He was a Christian deist because he saw Christianity as the highest expression of natural religion and Jesus as an incomparably great moral teacher. He was not an orthodox Christian because he rejected, among other things, the doctrines that Jesus was the promised Messiah and the incarnate Son of God. Jefferson's religion is fairly typical of the American form of deism in his day.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Jefferson_and_religion
The rejection of Jesus as the Messiah and the incarnate Son of God is a rejection of the Christian faith.
327
posted on
12/04/2009 11:38:31 AM PST
by
pby
To: Gordon Greene
Eve was constructed from Adams rib I had my doubts about that Jonah and the whale story but when my church told me that men had one less rib than women because God created women from man's rib I knew it was a bunch of malarky.
328
posted on
12/04/2009 11:39:41 AM PST
by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: pby
“He was a Christian deist because he saw Christianity as the highest expression of natural religion and Jesus as an incomparably great moral teacher.”
Thank you for making my point.
329
posted on
12/04/2009 11:40:40 AM PST
by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: xcamel
Help me out...
I am missing your point.
330
posted on
12/04/2009 11:42:14 AM PST
by
pby
To: metmom
Hopefully you something to read while you wait....Say The Collected Works of the Western World, unabridged edition.
331
posted on
12/04/2009 11:42:46 AM PST
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: count-your-change
War and Peace might be a good place to start.
332
posted on
12/04/2009 11:45:04 AM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: TooFarGone
"Lets start with teaching that as a basis for education and see what happens."Agreed.
333
posted on
12/04/2009 11:45:30 AM PST
by
celmak
To: count-your-change
In the original languages? (Which I would have to learn for most)
334
posted on
12/04/2009 11:45:49 AM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: metmom
And so back to the thread topic, Looks like the TOE has another black eye to try to eveolve out of.
No transition fossils, lots of fakes (Let’s just make it LOOK like something, a la AGW).
335
posted on
12/04/2009 11:46:55 AM PST
by
RoadGumby
(Ask me about Ducky)
To: metmom
“It doesnt seem that the retractions get quite the coverage as the announcements, and all that does is lend itself to accusations of agenda and cover-ups”
I would agree with the first part. The ManchurianStreamMedia has been quite consistent in its agenda-how many days now without a mention of the manmadeglobalwarmingisofficallyahoax?
But if a scientist attempted to move an idea forward based on a scientifically discredited piece of date (whether silently or publicly announced) his/her idea would be uncovered as based on refuted evidence.
“Im aware that scientists dont like the reasoning”
That’s my question exactly-what reasoning? It’s assumed a priori to already be false based on a belief system that is incompatible( mostly-there is the ‘god designed evolution’ school) with evolution. It seems to me to be the equivalent of: r too, am not, r too, am not . . .
336
posted on
12/04/2009 11:47:12 AM PST
by
TooFarGone
(Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one.)
To: celmak; TooFarGone
"Lets start with teaching that as a basis for education and see what happens." Perhaps just simply starting with TEACHING would be a good place to start.
337
posted on
12/04/2009 11:47:40 AM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: RoadGumby
And Cold Water, slips not so silently into irrelevance....So posts RG when he makes a claim unsupported by the Bible.
338
posted on
12/04/2009 11:51:20 AM PST
by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: metmom
"If you have a better definition, or even a definition, go for it." Before acknowledging that e-s is either a lier or an idiot I want to give him an opportunity to explain himself or revise his remarks. The burden is not on me to substantiate the statement. When someone makes a statement that transitionals don't exist they have an obligation to define what it is that does not exist, especially when the documented evidence for evolutionary transition is so overwhelming.
If you want to expand your role as the protective big sister to your posse I'll give you a chance to define a transitional fossil.
(hint: real scientists use phylogenetic taxonomy and morphological data matrices. Something more specific than *That dog don't hunt* with numbers and coefficients would be nice.)
To: metmom
When you find the Periodic Table, the Fine Structure Constant, the permeability of free space, or anything similar in the Bible, then let me know.
340
posted on
12/04/2009 11:53:05 AM PST
by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360 ... 661-666 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson