The Darwin Anniversary

CMI ^ | November 24, 2009 | Carl Wieland

[GodGunsGuts]

Today, November 24, it is exactly 150 years since Charles Darwin published his On the Origin of Species.

The world has been gearing up for this “second echelon” of celebrations for this international “Year of Darwin”, following on from the 200th anniversary of his birth this last February. Atheists and humanist groups in particular have seemed to be relishing the thought of giving further prominence to the ideas of their patron saint. Their adulation is heightened by their knowledge that...

[Agamemnon]

Ping to you Doctor Don:

Good for you. It’s a real pity that you will bother no one with your childish desecration. If anything, your orgasmic little dance proves that your disagreement with evolution is wholly emotional and ungrounded in fact.

Stomped all over your little god there did I? It bothered you enough to post your little pout, so now you've afforded me the added pleasure of being able to sit back and laugh at you as much as I'll continue to grind Darwin's name into the floor and mock him. Looks like I get a real "two fer" out of this one.

One more victory lap at the expense of the ego of yet another seething Darwinist. Mission accomplished!

[GodGunsGuts]

Ouch, that’s gotta hurt!

[Natural Law]

"One more victory lap at the expense of the ego of yet another seething Darwinist."

You bandy about words you consider to be pejoratives and insults like "evo" and "Darwinist" and then sit back and snicker at your cleverness. Why don't you define Darwinist for those a little less clever than you.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[Rummenigge]

ahh come on you all know how these scientists are - deleting e-mail and stuff.

There’s some simple truthes that will be held up for all eternity - safe from all muslimic communist scientists from europe - in a vault that is protected much better then france: In the hearts and minds of honest and straight americans.

Ronald Reagan created the world, man and beasts by tearing down the berlin wall single handedly.

If you hear anything else - just keep the faith.

[RoadGumby]

He perverts nothing by posting articles that tend to refute that which is counter to our belief. I pretend nothing. YOU are not the arbiter in this forum. If a registered member chooses to post an article of his own interest, WHO ARE YOU to say he can’t? You really need to perhaps consider a swap to DU. Your technique of ‘isolate and ridcule’ is right out of their play book.

You place so much trust in science, will you also mock the fact that after three days, Jesus rose from the dead, despite what ‘SCIENCE’ would tell you? Try that one on for size, see how far that gets you. Would you claim that GGG would be ‘perverting’ science by that belief?

Not a one of the people who support what the Bible says is anti-science. So, just go ahead and dismantle that strawman. But science certainly cannot explain all. And your manic belief in it, your persute of those who believe otherwise deserves that rant and much more.

[demshateGod]

you have NO idea what you’re talking about.

[ElectricStrawberry]

When you're done ranting about where I should comment, what I can say or not, what threads I'm allowed to comment on, what sites I should be commenting on (there's an ideology THAT tactic fits?).....like YOU have a say in what I say or do....lemme know if you have the mental capacity to understand the difference between:

a) Seeing something that is bogus....in a common news room....and making a comment....and....

2) Telling someone where they must comment.

Somehow, I don't think you can make the distinction so I'll spoon-feed it for ya. I do not say GGG CANNOT post in the news and must post elsewhere......I leave that nonsense tactic to you.

I'm saying that if he posts his perversion of sciences.....his wholesale broad dismissal of dozens of fields of science IN the news, the ONLY place I will see it, I am gonna comment until my fingers bleed or until Jim bans me.

So round up your dinosaur hunters and come and get me banned.

[RoadGumby]

I’ll comment on what you can say or where as long as you feel you can limit what others can say and where. If you don’t like the subject of a thread, Stay Out. Or, lacking that common sense, please be passably courteous.

a) It is possible to comment without being derisive, at least for others, not necessarily you.

b) You (and the rest of the anti-Creation group) opened the doorto telling someone where they may or may not post.

Again the word perversion. Let me spoon feed this to you. I’ll type slow so you can follow...

The Bible, Gods Word, IS NOT A PERVERSION. And IT IS NOT BOGUS.

It is NOT wrong for a person to post, here, in a forum that pre-supposes Freedom, articles that support their view. This is of course at the suffrance of the forums owner, who is ON RECORD of supoprting ‘religous debate’ in his forum.

If you choose to comment in a thread, you ought to have a bit more decency than the average KOS baby.

I have no interest in banning you aor anyone. You have ALL the fun you want posting your evolution-supporting articles. Even if I see them, I choose not to click them as THEY are the perversions. And if I were to lose my mind and read them and choose to comment, I would like to think that I wouold treat the poster, though I might disagree with him, with a bit more respect.

So round up your pond-scum descendants and try to behave.

[Behemoth the Cat]

"you have NO idea what you’re talking about."

In particular?

[svcw]

WOW. You have seen Jesus. That is so kool.

[svcw]

That indeed is a lengthy list but I’ll just address one item. Of course the earth is flat otherwise maps would be round. Happy Thanksgiving.

[Natural Law]

"It is possible to comment without being derisive, at least for others, not necessarily you."

Perhaps you should get together with GGG (especially GGG), Editor-Surveyor, Agamamnon, metmom, demshategod, roadgumby and any number of others who feel personally obligated to use what ever tactic is available to defend God from God's own creation; science.

[Agamemnon]

Why don't you define Darwinist for those a little less clever than you.

Well then, Natural Law "the lesser clever," are you a Darwinist? If so, then I am talking about you.

"Darwinist" is a term of derision, such as it applies to the cultists who adhere to the religion of Darwinism, so you may take it that I deride those that adhere to philosophies and principles as practiced and espoused by Darwinists.

If you don't know whether or not you are a Darwinist, just count yourself among the pathologically confused. It appears that you just may have to ponder that lint in your navel a little while longer. Why don't you just get back to us sometime when you've finally figured this all out.

[RoadGumby]

And that tactic would be what? The posting of views that offend someone who believes they are descended from pond-scum?

If a thread has the possibility of offending you, (Such as perhaps, a Helen Thomas thread) then just exercise your right NOT TO VIEW it. Just let us poor half-witted Creationists, those who believe in God, and His Word, have our little thread to play in. That would leave you free to go to a wonderfully enlightening, wishing for the good old-days of ape-hood, evolutionary ‘science’ thread.

[metmom]

I guess I missed your replies to my questions in post 88.

Could you repeat that? Your degree is in what field of science, again? What area of scientific study have you engaged in?

[metmom]

I'm saying that if he posts his perversion of sciences.....his wholesale broad dismissal of dozens of fields of science IN the news, the ONLY place I will see it, I am gonna comment until my fingers bleed or until Jim bans me.

And we will continue to point out evos perversion of theology.

So round up your dinosaur hunters and come and get me banned.

What a persecution complex.

You know, the whole martyr thing just doesn't wear well on someone so arrogant.

[metmom]

FOTFL....

[Natural Law]

As usual you have completely misunderstood the written word and emotionally perverted your response. I only commented that those who squawk the loudest about the derisive style of their counterparts are among the most derisive themselves.

You know nothing of my beliefs. I am an advocate of Theistic Evolution as taught by the Roman Catholic Church. I believe Scripture teaches THAT God created man in His own image, it did not seek to teach HOW. Natural selection and evolution are only two of the processes He used in Creation. I believe that those who pursue science are rewarded by God on a daily basis when He reveals the genius and splendor of His creation in greater detail than has ever been witnessed before.

Now put that gun back in the holster before you shoot yourself in the other foot, you know, the one that is in your mouth.