Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)
"I thought cooler heads would prevail, but I have to step in here: first, the issue of the Kenyan BC: this was information the law offices of Phil Berg has before the 2008 election."
Judging from that one sentence, it appears to me that English is the not the native language of the poster.
Read my lips....
It is about the birth certificate stupid!
Lol!
The birth announcement in the Hawaii newspaper does not provide an audit trail whatsoever. Birth announcements are frequently made by relatives and do not necessarily record the place of birth.
jveritas is emphatically NOT a troll.
The Obama administration has up till now used the “nuts and sluts” method of fighting the allegations, This “fake” if it is a fake is good enough to overcome that approach, putting them on the defensive
In a couple of the more recent posts we have 1963 or 1964 as the official date for the use of “Republic of Kenya”
You got some resources to get a verifiacation of which might be the case....?
You have to find the thread intro on the forum page. Views will be there before you click on the thread. welcome to FR.
He can try but, his BS would unravel under the intense scrutiny. Who would believe him Obama...but the extreme leftist Koolaid drinkers.
Nice work.
Yes, but something like birth certificates would be printed on forms, so it’s not out of the realm of possibility, knowing that they would need a lot of them, and to make them consistent, they would all be stamped with the Republic of Kenya the minute they started issuing them. At any rate, the ones recorded before and after, can be checked to see
Nate, you are a lot smarter than me for sure but it seems like we still need to concern ourselves with WHY we can get rid of Hussein rather than HOW we will get rid of him. Could we be getting a little bit ahead of ourselves?
Verification of the available evidence, and perhaps amassing more evidence, seems to be the stage at which we find ourselves right now. Let’s see what Orly produces on her trip.
Of course, I am of the school of thought which says that Hussein doesn’t qualify simply on the basis of who his parents were, regardless of birthplace. But that theory (D’Onofrio’s) doesn’t seem to get much traction, even among FReepers.
If jveritas is NOT a troll then he needs to check his facts before making ignorant statements.
It was a copy of the one still visible, made by FReeper Salamander to enlarge some print. It was taken down because people were confusing it for asnother document.
jveritas is a long-time poster and not a troll. I think the point he was trying to make was that while Kenya became independent at the end of 1963, it didn’t declare itself a republic until the end of 1964.
My feeling is that it had to be known as something in the interim, and since it planned to be a republic, it may have referred to itself that way in internal documents, regardless of the fact that it wasn’t “official.” The only way to prove it either way would be to find an official Kenyan document from that same period.
When you receive a copy of an official documet there are two kinds, official and unofficial. Think college transcripts. The student copy contains no raised seal, while the official mailed to the recipient or sent to student in sealed envelope contains a raised college seal.
But lying on his application should have mattered. He had used other names besides BHO.
bookmark for later reading...
Still no commet about the line called “Christian name” whereas it omits the last name Obama.
The Christian name is listed as Barack Hussein. (No Obama)
Is this why Obama did not want to be called Hussein?
Was he intentionally denying his Christian name?
Or do I just not understand how the term ‘christian name’ is used?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.