Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Parents Beware: Shrek 2 Features Transgenderism and Crossdressing Themes
Traditional Values Coalition ^ | May 28, 2004

Posted on 06/22/2004 6:56:15 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist

Summary: The DreamWorks' animated film, "Shrek 2," is billed as harmless entertainment but contains subtle sexual messages.

Parents who are thinking about taking their children to see "Shrek 2", may wish to consider the following: The movie features a male-to-female transgender (in transition) as an evil bartender. The character has a five o'clock shadow, wears a dress and has female breasts. It is clear that he is a she-male. His voice is that of talk show host Larry King.

During a dance scene at the end of the movie, this transgendered man expresses sexual desire for Prince Charming, jumps on him, and both tumble to the floor.

In another scene in the movie, Shrek and Donkey need to be rescued from a dungeon where they are chained against the wall. The rescue is conducted by pinnochio who is asked to lie so his nose will grow long enough for one of the smaller cartoon characters to use it as a bridge to reach Shrek and Donkey. Donkey encourages him to lie about something and suggetsts he lie about wearing women's underwear. When he denies wearing women's underwear, his nose begins to grow.

An earlier scene in the movie features a wolf dressed in grandma's clothing and reading a book when Prince Charming encounters him. Later, one of the characters refers to the wolf's gender confusion.

TVC's report "A gender Identity Disorder Goes Mainstream" explains the transgender agenda and the effort to deconstruct the biological reality of male and female. DreamWorks is helping in this effort by promoting cross dressing and transgenderism in this animated film.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: boogeyman; crossdressersaresick; crossdressing; culturewar; downyourthroat; handwringer; homosexualagenda; homosexualapologists; imshocked; inyourface; menwearingunderwear; missmanners; nofun; notchildrenshumor; parentsnotfriends; permissivesociety; prisoners; riteway4smackdbottom; sexualizingchildren; shrek2; shrek2isperverted; sickbehavior; smuttyhumor; stickupbutt; transgenderism; tvc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 381-394 next last
To: Qwinn; SoCal Pubbie

"I can't think of any way someone can "distance oneself" from a sick behavior than to mock it and laugh at it. That's what you don't get. Far as I'm concerned, Shrek II presented it exactly as it should be presented - as a bizarre behavior deserving of ridicule."


Answer me THIS:

WHY should this even be brought up AT ALL in a "kid's movie"?


121 posted on 06/22/2004 8:11:04 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (I was there! I passed Reagan's casket 6/10 3:40 PM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel

I NEVER get bored by truly great innocent, tasteful old Disney movies like ... Bambi "


Truly innocent? "Bambi" taught an entire generation of kids the evils of gun-toting, white, male hunters.


122 posted on 06/22/2004 8:12:35 AM PDT by Blzbba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Someone better ensure that this group never sees the tape of Elvis Presley on the Ed Sullivan show.


123 posted on 06/22/2004 8:12:40 AM PDT by Teplukin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel
"'some people have too much time on their hands and need to get a life'"

The same could be said of all of us constantly posting here.


I had a life once; then I bought a computer with a modem...
124 posted on 06/22/2004 8:13:01 AM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The world needs more horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: nmh
"So do many "Bugs Bunny" cartoons from 50 years ago."

Only in your mind! Perhaps you have a wishful imagination for this? ...


Rabbit of Seville

125 posted on 06/22/2004 8:14:00 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: nmh
Only in your mind!






This is from 1952, and it gives a whole new meaning to the question, "What's Up, Doc?"
126 posted on 06/22/2004 8:16:39 AM PDT by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

1.Well, the bartender character, whom you call the ugly stepsister, wore a dress, had breasts, and had a five-o'clock shadow. So, it was a she-male.

2.Because, like a poster on here previously said, promoting transgenderism in this sort of way, it proverbially speaking, "gets the camel to stick his nose in the tent..."

3. How can people with a mental disorder file for defamation? Shouldn't they be rehabilitated instead, to get them out of behaving the way they do? I mean, society locks up/helps many who have mental disorders.


127 posted on 06/22/2004 8:17:50 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Lord_Baltar

1. In "After the Ball" the two homosexual authors laid out the plans of the homosexual activists of how to get "straight" society to accept them and indeed, how to dominate the discussion about homosexuality.

You should read the book or at least the summary which has gets posted every now and then on FR. One of the methods (as stated in their book which was printed in the 80s) was to include homosexual topics in entertainment in a humorous, harmless way - a gentle introduction. "Cute" and funny.

2. What is your viewpoint of homosexuality? Do you think it is harmless? Do you think homosexual behavior is morally equal to marriage between a man and a woman? And third, what is your opinion of the fact that children K-12 in California are mandated by law since 2001 to learn a "gay" friendly cirrciulum?

These are not rhetorical questions, I'd be interested to know where you stand. You accuse me of handwringing, so I'd really like to know your viewpoint.


128 posted on 06/22/2004 8:19:23 AM PDT by little jeremiah (http://www.mikegabbard.com - a REAL conservative running for Congress from Hawaii!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
I thought the first Harry Potter movie was good fun; had it come out when I was a lad, I may have seen it several times. I hope there's no silly objection based on matters of occult themes or other nonsense.

Well, Rome's official exorcist, Fr. Gabrielle Amorth said "behind Harry Potter hides the signature of the king of the darkness, the devil."

"The exorcist, with his decades of experience in directly combating evil, explained that J.K. Rowling's books contain innumerable positive references to magic, 'the satanic art'. He noted that the books attempt to make a false distinction between black and white magic, when in fact, the distinction 'does not exist, because magic is always a turn to the devil.'"
But what does he know.
129 posted on 06/22/2004 8:20:00 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Qwinn

I agree with you 100%! I am beginning to think a lot is overblown if they got this out of Shrek II -- went to see it with my daughter and I thought it was funny. I did not see an agenda at play in the movie. Call me naive but I think to get worked up over this movie is ludicrous!

Makes me wonder too if some of what we heard about the public schools from some folks is a bit overblown. I have three kids who had great educations in public schools except for one year in MA (home of Kerry) and I will continue to support a public school education because my three kids are better rounded and able to deal with people that don't think like they do!


130 posted on 06/22/2004 8:20:14 AM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Oklahoma is Reagan Country and now Bush Country -- Win Another One for the Gipper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel
Because the film was designed to appeal to both kids and adults. The parents will laugh at the references to "Gap Queen" and the "medieval meal", while those jokes will fly right over their kids' heads.
131 posted on 06/22/2004 8:22:06 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

"Point being that getting all worked up over a "movie" misses where the real education is being given, and living with it daily does NOT mean there are thousands (millions?) of cross-dressers going to school. It means that "IF" one, anyone, does it is considered acceptable."


your point misses the most important point, which is that parents are the ultimate guidance and instruction for their children and good parenting can counter anything that schools teach.


132 posted on 06/22/2004 8:23:38 AM PDT by Blzbba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
By your logic then Sleeping Beauty promotes witchcraft because the evil witch "pokes her nose in the tent".
133 posted on 06/22/2004 8:23:51 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Dear Lord, it's a movie (and one of the funniest I've ever seen)! The bartender, for the edification of this prudish reviewer and those who might take his chicken-little pronouncements at face value and cower under their covers with a flashlight and their bibles in an effort to ward off Satan, was a wicked stepsister -- as in Cinderella's wicked stepsisters.


134 posted on 06/22/2004 8:24:13 AM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blzbba
You forgot to mention the worst part about those Bugs Bunny cartoons. Bugs would sometimes pretend to get married to Elmer and kiss him on the lips. That must have been my sick imagination.
About Shrek 2. Both Shrek movies were made for adults, not children. Second, as one local movie reviewer said about the first movie. It's written in such a way that adults and children will be seeing it as two different movies. A lady I know was shocked by the innuendos in the first movie, but her stepdaughter never even noticed them and asked if they could get the movie when it came out on video.
135 posted on 06/22/2004 8:24:55 AM PDT by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

"Well, the bartender character, whom you call the ugly stepsister, wore a dress, had breasts, and had a five-o'clock shadow. So, it was a she-male. "

Two words for you: Janet Reno.


136 posted on 06/22/2004 8:25:20 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: BritExPatInFla

Not to mention that ogres are known evil critters, and this movie paints them in a sympathetic light.


137 posted on 06/22/2004 8:25:49 AM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom


You think this is all overblown?(Shrek 2)One of the main ways that the homosexual agenda has sought to desensitize children is to have them exposed to homosexual themes(like cross-dressing/transgenderism) which are presented in a funny, harmless way.


138 posted on 06/22/2004 8:27:23 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Blzbba
"your point misses the most important point, which is that parents are the ultimate guidance and instruction for their children and good parenting can counter anything that schools teach."


There in lies the rest of the story, since I have been required to give the ultimate guidance and instruction and have the eyes of innocence look at me and say about some "well, I know, but they have been O.K." to me. Or whisper "Watch what you say there is so in so".
139 posted on 06/22/2004 8:29:17 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

"By your logic then Sleeping Beauty promotes witchcraft because the evil witch "pokes her nose in the tent"."


Don't forget "Snow White", "Cinderella", the Tooth Fairy, Santa Claus, and all other 'magical' characters of childhood.


140 posted on 06/22/2004 8:29:39 AM PDT by Blzbba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 381-394 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson