Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the OlLine Rebel
Because the film was designed to appeal to both kids and adults. The parents will laugh at the references to "Gap Queen" and the "medieval meal", while those jokes will fly right over their kids' heads.
131 posted on 06/22/2004 8:22:06 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]


To: All

Puss in boots, Antonio Banderas, is reason enough to buy a ticket to Shrek 2. That, plus it is a much better film than the first one, IMO.

There were a few scenes that I though were inappropriate and unneccessary but all in all a fun movie!


143 posted on 06/22/2004 8:32:18 AM PDT by shattered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: SoCal Pubbie

It is STILL a "kid's movie", and both kids and adults will always think of it as such.

Just as we think Cinderella is a kid's movie.

How is it that that didn't need all those "adult" (read: *immature* childish sexuality and profanity and crude behavior - yes, including farting) innuendoes and such?

I'm not talking about things generally only more knowledgeable adults would know about - Bugs Bunny was replete w/that kind of stuff: historical references, arts references, contemporary issues, etc. I'm talking about baseness, crudity. Ugliness.


207 posted on 06/22/2004 10:38:57 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (I was there! I passed Reagan's casket 6/10 3:40 PM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson