Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Parents Beware: Shrek 2 Features Transgenderism and Crossdressing Themes
Traditional Values Coalition ^ | May 28, 2004

Posted on 06/22/2004 6:56:15 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist

Summary: The DreamWorks' animated film, "Shrek 2," is billed as harmless entertainment but contains subtle sexual messages.

Parents who are thinking about taking their children to see "Shrek 2", may wish to consider the following: The movie features a male-to-female transgender (in transition) as an evil bartender. The character has a five o'clock shadow, wears a dress and has female breasts. It is clear that he is a she-male. His voice is that of talk show host Larry King.

During a dance scene at the end of the movie, this transgendered man expresses sexual desire for Prince Charming, jumps on him, and both tumble to the floor.

In another scene in the movie, Shrek and Donkey need to be rescued from a dungeon where they are chained against the wall. The rescue is conducted by pinnochio who is asked to lie so his nose will grow long enough for one of the smaller cartoon characters to use it as a bridge to reach Shrek and Donkey. Donkey encourages him to lie about something and suggetsts he lie about wearing women's underwear. When he denies wearing women's underwear, his nose begins to grow.

An earlier scene in the movie features a wolf dressed in grandma's clothing and reading a book when Prince Charming encounters him. Later, one of the characters refers to the wolf's gender confusion.

TVC's report "A gender Identity Disorder Goes Mainstream" explains the transgender agenda and the effort to deconstruct the biological reality of male and female. DreamWorks is helping in this effort by promoting cross dressing and transgenderism in this animated film.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: boogeyman; crossdressersaresick; crossdressing; culturewar; downyourthroat; handwringer; homosexualagenda; homosexualapologists; imshocked; inyourface; menwearingunderwear; missmanners; nofun; notchildrenshumor; parentsnotfriends; permissivesociety; prisoners; riteway4smackdbottom; sexualizingchildren; shrek2; shrek2isperverted; sickbehavior; smuttyhumor; stickupbutt; transgenderism; tvc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 381-394 next last
To: Rightly Biased
So If I am retentive I get a parting Gift?

Metamucil does wonders for that problem.

101 posted on 06/22/2004 8:03:24 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Rightly Biased

hehehehehe


102 posted on 06/22/2004 8:03:38 AM PDT by Lord_Baltar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

See my post 19. There is a difference from "old time" to "now" the way these things are presented (I can't vouch for Shrek 2 tho it wouldn't shock me).

Adults getting bored just cuz there's no sex or other base innuendo or piggishness (like farting, burping, etc, which have appeared recently)? I NEVER get bored by truly great innocent, tasteful old Disney movies like Lady & the Tramp, Cinderella, Snow White, Bambi and the like.

Altho Pinnochio gets boring. But that's just not a great story, or not a great telling.


103 posted on 06/22/2004 8:03:51 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (I was there! I passed Reagan's casket 6/10 3:40 PM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Please explain to me how portraying the ugly step sister as a large, unattractive individual with the voice of Larry King can possibly be consider "promoting" transgenderism. If anything it has set the practice back. As another poster wrote, it is surprising the transgendered have not filed suit for defamation.


104 posted on 06/22/2004 8:04:02 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

"The wolf dressed in a nightie is from "Little Red Riding Hood" a classic Grimm tale. "


Oh no! Now he'll start griping about the 'overt bestiality themes in evil fairy tales'!!


105 posted on 06/22/2004 8:04:12 AM PDT by Blzbba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: mhking

But what if its on the other end?


106 posted on 06/22/2004 8:04:20 AM PDT by Rightly Biased (I'll vote Republican till the day I die then I'll vote democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
We are all going to hell in a handbasket. I blame Milton Berle.

I blame Jack Lemmon and Tony Curtis myself, although Milton may have beaten them to it.

They were pushing these issues before the creators of Shrek were born.

107 posted on 06/22/2004 8:04:30 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

"Those behaviors should be brought to childrens attention as sick behaviors, not to be even laughed at, but behaviors one should totally distance onesself from."

I can't think of any way someone can "distance oneself" from a sick behavior than to mock it and laugh at it. That's what you don't get. Far as I'm concerned, Shrek II presented it exactly as it should be presented - as a bizarre behavior deserving of ridicule.

Maybe to you, being subjected to ridicule is a "fun" activity, since you seem to think that children will watch it and think, YAY, maybe if I become trangendered people will make fun of me too! I find this a very bizarre perspective. Most people do -not- enjoy being mocked, and if they do, they're a lost cause anyway.

Most people can distinguish between being laughed WITH and being laughed AT. You seem to have difficulty doing so, in that you seem to think it was portrayed as a very thin line in the movie. I saw it, and I really, really don't think so.

Qwinn


108 posted on 06/22/2004 8:04:37 AM PDT by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Rightly Biased
I guess that would take parting to a whole new level?

Kind of like parting the waters from the waters... [duck & run]

109 posted on 06/22/2004 8:04:40 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Rightly Biased
But what if its on the other end?

"All hail the porcelain goddess!"

110 posted on 06/22/2004 8:05:30 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I was going to mention the Bugs Bunny cartoons also....


111 posted on 06/22/2004 8:05:52 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly ... But Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS press corpse lies every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Those behaviors should be brought to childrens attention as sick behaviors, not to be even laughed at, but behaviors one should totally distance onesself from.

Hmmm.. could it be. . . satan???


112 posted on 06/22/2004 8:06:01 AM PDT by humblegunner (This dog bite me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Blzbba
"They are required to now live with it in their day to day lives."


"So thousands (millions?) of children are now crossdressing on a daily basis in schools and getting sex-changes? Sorry - I don't think so."

HELLO did I make the claim? Public schools present to our children that any behavior is acceptable, well except "Christian". Although some who claim to be "Christian" give it a bad name.

Point being that getting all worked up over a "movie" misses where the real education is being given, and living with it daily does NOT mean there are thousands (millions?) of cross-dressers going to school. It means that "IF" one, anyone, does it is considered acceptable.

Meaning don't "judge", that is who that person is, accept it and if your heart desires then go ahead, there is nothing strange about it and if anybody says otherwise then they are the one who has the problem.
113 posted on 06/22/2004 8:06:47 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: LPM1888
Traditional Values Coalition
Is this is the same group that had the same complaint about Huckleberry Finn being a bad movie because Huckleberry dresses as a girl in one part? Even though it was following the book.
114 posted on 06/22/2004 8:07:06 AM PDT by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Lord_Baltar

You must be a proponent of the criminalizing of "hate speech". It seems in your universe I am at fault for not being happy about the inclusion of crossdressing and transgender themes in childrens' movies. You are equating my opinion with censoring? This is what leftists are always saying. That to NOT LIKE a movie or a theme in movies is censoring?

Censoring is when the GOVERNMENT forbids topics or subjects from being discussed or shown in entertainment or media.

So you think my opinion or viewpoint should be censored?


115 posted on 06/22/2004 8:07:43 AM PDT by little jeremiah (http://www.mikegabbard.com - a REAL conservative running for Congress from Hawaii!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

"Loosen up, Lassy"

I noticed that you had nothing to say about mhking, to whom I replied that sentence which you have quoted.

Unbias thyself, fumblegunner.


116 posted on 06/22/2004 8:09:17 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Hermit; nmh

LOL! According to nmh, those old cartoons are 'only in our minds', as if they weren't actually written. Funny pic, btw.


117 posted on 06/22/2004 8:09:23 AM PDT by Blzbba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

"So you think my opinion or viewpoint should be censored?"

Of course not Jeremiah, I think hand wringing scolds should always have their opinions heard.

I usually find them as amusing as Shrek


118 posted on 06/22/2004 8:09:46 AM PDT by Lord_Baltar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Blzbba

Yes, but in kids' movies? And maybe if the "innocent fun" of alcoholism weren't taken so lightly and made to seem harmless, there wouldn't be so many lives ruined from alcoholism.


119 posted on 06/22/2004 8:10:11 AM PDT by little jeremiah (http://www.mikegabbard.com - a REAL conservative running for Congress from Hawaii!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Laissez, did you see Shrek 2, or not?


120 posted on 06/22/2004 8:10:47 AM PDT by Lord_Baltar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 381-394 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson