Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

"Those behaviors should be brought to childrens attention as sick behaviors, not to be even laughed at, but behaviors one should totally distance onesself from."

I can't think of any way someone can "distance oneself" from a sick behavior than to mock it and laugh at it. That's what you don't get. Far as I'm concerned, Shrek II presented it exactly as it should be presented - as a bizarre behavior deserving of ridicule.

Maybe to you, being subjected to ridicule is a "fun" activity, since you seem to think that children will watch it and think, YAY, maybe if I become trangendered people will make fun of me too! I find this a very bizarre perspective. Most people do -not- enjoy being mocked, and if they do, they're a lost cause anyway.

Most people can distinguish between being laughed WITH and being laughed AT. You seem to have difficulty doing so, in that you seem to think it was portrayed as a very thin line in the movie. I saw it, and I really, really don't think so.

Qwinn


108 posted on 06/22/2004 8:04:37 AM PDT by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: Qwinn; SoCal Pubbie

"I can't think of any way someone can "distance oneself" from a sick behavior than to mock it and laugh at it. That's what you don't get. Far as I'm concerned, Shrek II presented it exactly as it should be presented - as a bizarre behavior deserving of ridicule."


Answer me THIS:

WHY should this even be brought up AT ALL in a "kid's movie"?


121 posted on 06/22/2004 8:11:04 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (I was there! I passed Reagan's casket 6/10 3:40 PM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson