Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'The Nativity Story' Movie Problematic for Catholics, "Unsuitable" for Young Children
LifeSiteNews.com ^ | 12/4/2006 | John-Henry Westen

Posted on 12/04/2006 7:52:47 PM PST by Pyro7480

'The Nativity Story' Movie Problematic for Catholics, "Unsuitable" for Young Children

By John-Henry Westen

NEW YORK, December 4, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A review of New Line Cinema's The Nativity story by Fr. Angelo Mary Geiger of the Franciscans of the Immaculate in the United States, points out that the film, which opened December 1, misinterprets scripture from a Catholic perspective.

While Fr. Geiger admits that he found the film is "in general, to be a pious and reverential presentation of the Christmas mystery." He adds however, that "not only does the movie get the Virgin Birth wrong, it thoroughly Protestantizes its portrayal of Our Lady."

In Isaiah 7:14 the Bible predicts the coming of the Messiah saying: "Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign. Behold a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and his name shall be called Emmanuel." Fr. Geiger, in an video blog post, explains that the Catholic Church has taught for over 2000 years that the referenced Scripture showed that Mary would not only conceive the child miraculously, but would give birth to the child miraculously - keeping her physical virginity intact during the birth.

The film, he suggests, in portraying a natural, painful birth of Christ, thus denies the truth of the virginal and miraculous birth of Christ, which, he notes, the Fathers of the Church compared to light passing through glass without breaking it. Fr. Geiger quoted the fourth century St. Augustine on the matter saying. "That same power which brought the body of the young man through closed doors, brought the body of the infant forth from the inviolate womb of the mother."

Fr. Geiger contrasts The Nativity Story with The Passion of the Christ, noting that with the latter, Catholics and Protestants could agree to support it. He suggests, however, that the latter is "a virtual coup against Catholic Mariology".

The characterization of Mary further debases her as Fr. Geiger relates in his review. "Mary in The Nativity lacks depth and stature, and becomes the subject of a treatment on teenage psychology."

Beyond the non-miraculous birth, the biggest let-down for Catholics comes from Director Catherine Hardwicke's own words. Hardwicke explains her rationale in an interview: "We wanted her [Mary] to feel accessible to a young teenager, so she wouldn't seem so far away from their life that it had no meaning for them. I wanted them to see Mary as a girl, as a teenager at first, not perfectly pious from the very first moment. So you see Mary going through stuff with her parents where they say, 'You're going to marry this guy, and these are the rules you have to follow.' Her father is telling her that she's not to have sex with Joseph for a year-and Joseph is standing right there."

Comments Fr. Geiger, "it is rather disconcerting to see Our Blessed Mother portrayed with 'attitude;' asserting herself in a rather anachronistic rebellion against an arranged marriage, choosing her words carefully with her parents, and posing meaningful silences toward those who do not understand her."

Fr. Geiger adds that the film also contains "an overly graphic scene of St. Elizabeth giving birth," which is "just not suitable, in my opinion, for young children to view."

Despite its flaws Fr. Geiger, after viewing the film, also has some good things to say about it. "Today, one must commend any sincere attempt to put Christ back into Christmas, and this film is certainly one of them," he says. "The Nativity Story in no way compares to the masterpiece which is The Passion of the Christ, but it is at least sincere, untainted by cynicism, and a worthy effort by Hollywood to end the prejudice against Christianity in the public square."

And, in addition to a good portrait of St. Joseph, the film offers "at least one cinematic and spiritual triumph" in portraying the Visitation of Mary to St. Elizabeth. "Although the Magnificat is relegated to a kind of epilogue at the movie's end, the meeting between Mary and Elizabeth is otherwise faithful to the scriptures and quite poignant. In a separate scene, the two women experience the concurrent movement of their children in utero and share deeply in each other's joy. I can't think of another piece of celluloid that illustrates the dignity of the unborn child better than this."

See Fr. Geiger's full review here:
http://airmaria.com/


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Religion & Culture; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic; catholics; christmas; mary; movie; nativity; nativitystory; thenativitystory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 6,181-6,2006,201-6,2206,221-6,240 ... 16,241-16,256 next last
To: hosepipe
Beautiful thoughts, dear hosepipe! I too look forward to all of it - I'm sure it'll be amazing (and never boring.)

But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him. - I Cor 2:9

Maranatha, Jesus!

6,201 posted on 01/15/2007 11:06:48 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6200 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

Thank you for discussing things rationaly and not resorting to yelling (Typing in all caps)


6,202 posted on 01/15/2007 11:15:45 PM PST by kawaii (Orthodox Christianity -- Proclaiming the Truth Since 33 A.D.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6197 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
[ But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him. - I Cor 2:9 ]

Indeed my favorite verse.. Number one of many many favorites..
What a promise and declaration.. worthy to sell all you have for this pearl of great price..

6,203 posted on 01/15/2007 11:16:34 PM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6201 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

There are cetainly new testament things which supercede the Jewish religion which misinterpretated many things. I would certainly argue that the New Testament definition of the Saints supercedes Old Testament misunderstandings.


6,204 posted on 01/15/2007 11:17:38 PM PST by kawaii (Orthodox Christianity -- Proclaiming the Truth Since 33 A.D.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6199 | View Replies]

To: kawaii
The word saint in the new testament original language(not Latin) merely means "holy one" or "the holy ones".. Holy in the Hebrew sense of the word.. The Greeks had no corresponding word for holy in the Hebrew sense/language, one had to be invented..
What makes them holy?.. i.e. saints..
The Blood of Jesus.. Not a declaration by some other human..

NOTE: In new testament times they did not call each other christians but "holy ones"/"saints".. Non believers called them christians.. they called each other holy ones/saints..

6,205 posted on 01/15/2007 11:36:54 PM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6204 | View Replies]

To: kosta50; Blogger
[Blogger:] Paul spent YEARS studying before launching into full-time ministry.

You are wasting your words. He spent years studying Judaism. What made him an inerrant apostle of Christ was not his study of Judaism.

Perhaps Blogger is referring to this:

Gal. 1:15-18 : 15 But when God, who set me apart from birth and called me by his grace, was pleased 16 to reveal his Son in me so that I might preach him among the Gentiles, I did not consult any man, 17 nor did I go up to Jerusalem to see those who were apostles before I was, but I went immediately into Arabia and later returned to Damascus. 18 Then after three years, I went up to Jerusalem to get acquainted with Peter and stayed with him fifteen days.

I think it most likely that Paul spent those three years in solitude in prayer, meditation and study on what Christ had revealed to him. Only after these years did he begin his full-time ministry.

6,206 posted on 01/16/2007 12:13:16 AM PST by Forest Keeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4648 | View Replies]

To: annalex; Blogger
[Alex to Blogger:] More to the point, what exactly is supposed to be the problem with these prayers, in your view? They all make clear that her mediation is to Christ. I've got to run but I would really like to know if it is simply a form of spirituality that is foreign to you or where do you see a fundamental problem.

Well, the prayers that Blogger posted all show a theme. Even from the first one we DO see a fundamental problem:

Mary, Help of Those in Need

Holy Mary, help those in need, give strength to the weak, comfort the sorrowful, pray for God's people, assist the clergy, intercede for religious. Mary all who seek your help experience your unfailing protection. Amen.

Here we have a list of different tasks being asked of Mary. One of the many is to pray for God's people. But that is what you tell us is your entire request of Mary, to pray for us. This obviously does not match. Helping, giving, comforting, praying, assisting, and interceding are all listed as separate requests. Just this one example, among the others Blogger cited, and still hundreds more that are out there, I'm sure, tell us that there is MUCH more going on here than the simple solicitation to Mary to pray for us.

The last thing in the world I think of when reading these prayers to Mary is mediation. These are action requests. "Mary, do this for me now", etc. When I ask my friend for prayer I do not say "Steve, give strength to the weak, and I experience your protection of me." After reading the prayers that Blogger posted, that comparison is now officially COMPLETELY out the window as far as I'm concerned. (Thank you, Blogger :)

6,207 posted on 01/16/2007 3:16:05 AM PST by Forest Keeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4752 | View Replies]

To: Forest Keeper; annalex; Blogger
The last thing in the world I think of when reading these prayers to Mary is mediation.

That should be intercession.

6,208 posted on 01/16/2007 3:19:49 AM PST by Forest Keeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6207 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

"I didn't think there was any HTML in that to make it go all squishy!"

Its the Greek words which caused the problem. Whenever you use them, you have to close each paragraph, both before and after the Greek with the appropriate HTML tag. I learned the hard way! :)


6,209 posted on 01/16/2007 4:15:42 AM PST by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6185 | View Replies]

To: kosta50; annalex; Dr. Eckleburg; Mad Dawg; kawaii; Kolokotronis; D-fendr; Blogger; jo kus
That's better-I think. I understand now. The scriptures are inspired by God, Himself, but the Church is free to override what God has said. Okay, if that's your story I'll stick to sola scriptura.
6,210 posted on 01/16/2007 4:34:45 AM PST by HarleyD ("...even the one whom He will choose, He will bring near Himself." Num 16:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6013 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

Very little faith is blind.

The people you trust are also the ones who wrote the history books.

At some point in time, you are trusting that what the priests and historians are telling you is true. That is faith.


6,211 posted on 01/16/2007 5:08:16 AM PST by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6194 | View Replies]

To: kosta50

A creed is NOT Scripture. It is not a complete statement of everything that we believe is Christians. Frankly, it doesn't need to be because we HAVE Scripture. So, even though the creed doesn't have a statement on the atonement, it matters not because I do not take the creed as authoritative. Rather, it is a statement of faith. Incomplete, but valuable for a general understanding.


6,212 posted on 01/16/2007 5:11:03 AM PST by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6198 | View Replies]

To: kosta50; Dr. Eckleburg

"You have yet to answer my question why is God under obligation to die for us?"

John 3:16, "And this is the way God loved the world, He gave His only Son to die for us...".


6,213 posted on 01/16/2007 5:12:08 AM PST by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6131 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

Absolute Biblical Truth.

Great sequence of it. Praise God.


6,214 posted on 01/16/2007 5:40:29 AM PST by Quix (LET GOD ARISE AND HIShe ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6199 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis; Forest Keeper; kosta50; Blogger; blue-duncan; The_Reader_David; annalex; Mad Dawg
In order for one to be a member of a particular church, Orthodoxy teaches that we must believe the exact same things. In saying this Orthodoxy doesn't go so far as the Latin Church does in great measure because we don't define theological matters to the same extent that the Latin Church does.

Oh, please. There are significant differences in the way the East and West view Mary, purgatory, Church authority, sin/grace, and a number of other issues. About the only thing you two agree on is the Eucharist.

What I am pointing to, as was Kosta, is the "Oneness" and "Catholicity" of The Church, something which lacking in virtually all of "Protestantism". Now it is apparent that "Protestants", despite the fact that they virtually all recite The Creed (another one of those spiritual things The Church gave you, either don't understand what they are praying or they positively reject it.

And where does the Orthodox stand on the Nicene Creed? There are very few of the early creeds that I believe Protestants would "reject".

I have been in a number of church in all parts of the world. I can assure you that, while their services may vary, Protestants have this "oneness" also. That being said, there are some Protestants churches I would not enter. However, after reading some of the problems with the Catholic Church, there are a number of them I wouldn't attend if I were Catholic. I suspect the same is true about Orthodoxy.

Protestantism may be the rejection of "teaching authority" of the Church, but let's look at what that means. You have told me that Orthodoxy is very complex to understand and take years of reading and immersion to fully grasp it. Protestants simply state, "Repent, believe in the Lord Jesus and you shall be saved." We don't need much more "teaching authority" than that.

6,215 posted on 01/16/2007 5:50:42 AM PST by HarleyD ("...even the one whom He will choose, He will bring near Himself." Num 16:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6000 | View Replies]

To: blue-duncan; Kolokotronis; D-fendr; Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; wmfights; kosta50; P-Marlowe; xzins; ...
We did get a Nigerian who had a lot of money his father had deposited in a bank in Nigeria that was embargoed under one of the many administrations. All he needed was $5,000.00 as a good faith advance and he could get millions to share with us for our building project.

LOL! You remind me of the, BY FAR, best e-mail scam (and abuse by the responder) I have ever read. It is hideously long, but worth every minute (if you like my sense of humor :). The only thing you need is a working knowledge of the very basics of "Star Wars". This African scammer has no clue. :) If you haven't already seen this, enjoy:

Darth Vader adopts an apprentice or two (Danga vs. Darth)

6,216 posted on 01/16/2007 5:55:47 AM PST by Forest Keeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4770 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

I probably need to meditate on that one more.

A great verse.

Thanks.


6,217 posted on 01/16/2007 6:14:36 AM PST by Quix (LET GOD ARISE AND HIShe ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6203 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

Interesting.

Didn't know that.

Thanks for helping me learn something.


6,218 posted on 01/16/2007 6:15:46 AM PST by Quix (LET GOD ARISE AND HIShe ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6205 | View Replies]

To: Forest Keeper; Kolokotronis; D-fendr; Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; wmfights; kosta50; P-Marlowe; ...

This is the site I go to for laughs. The letters are terrific and the scams of the scammers are great.

http://www.419eater.com/


6,219 posted on 01/16/2007 6:27:45 AM PST by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6216 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

Can you cite any sources for this? After all the Greek bishops which came together in the 7 councils were pretty good speakers of Greek. I think they'd know what words meant.


6,220 posted on 01/16/2007 6:51:25 AM PST by kawaii (Orthodox Christianity -- Proclaiming the Truth Since 33 A.D.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6205 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 6,181-6,2006,201-6,2206,221-6,240 ... 16,241-16,256 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson