Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'The Nativity Story' Movie Problematic for Catholics, "Unsuitable" for Young Children
LifeSiteNews.com ^ | 12/4/2006 | John-Henry Westen

Posted on 12/04/2006 7:52:47 PM PST by Pyro7480

'The Nativity Story' Movie Problematic for Catholics, "Unsuitable" for Young Children

By John-Henry Westen

NEW YORK, December 4, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A review of New Line Cinema's The Nativity story by Fr. Angelo Mary Geiger of the Franciscans of the Immaculate in the United States, points out that the film, which opened December 1, misinterprets scripture from a Catholic perspective.

While Fr. Geiger admits that he found the film is "in general, to be a pious and reverential presentation of the Christmas mystery." He adds however, that "not only does the movie get the Virgin Birth wrong, it thoroughly Protestantizes its portrayal of Our Lady."

In Isaiah 7:14 the Bible predicts the coming of the Messiah saying: "Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign. Behold a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and his name shall be called Emmanuel." Fr. Geiger, in an video blog post, explains that the Catholic Church has taught for over 2000 years that the referenced Scripture showed that Mary would not only conceive the child miraculously, but would give birth to the child miraculously - keeping her physical virginity intact during the birth.

The film, he suggests, in portraying a natural, painful birth of Christ, thus denies the truth of the virginal and miraculous birth of Christ, which, he notes, the Fathers of the Church compared to light passing through glass without breaking it. Fr. Geiger quoted the fourth century St. Augustine on the matter saying. "That same power which brought the body of the young man through closed doors, brought the body of the infant forth from the inviolate womb of the mother."

Fr. Geiger contrasts The Nativity Story with The Passion of the Christ, noting that with the latter, Catholics and Protestants could agree to support it. He suggests, however, that the latter is "a virtual coup against Catholic Mariology".

The characterization of Mary further debases her as Fr. Geiger relates in his review. "Mary in The Nativity lacks depth and stature, and becomes the subject of a treatment on teenage psychology."

Beyond the non-miraculous birth, the biggest let-down for Catholics comes from Director Catherine Hardwicke's own words. Hardwicke explains her rationale in an interview: "We wanted her [Mary] to feel accessible to a young teenager, so she wouldn't seem so far away from their life that it had no meaning for them. I wanted them to see Mary as a girl, as a teenager at first, not perfectly pious from the very first moment. So you see Mary going through stuff with her parents where they say, 'You're going to marry this guy, and these are the rules you have to follow.' Her father is telling her that she's not to have sex with Joseph for a year-and Joseph is standing right there."

Comments Fr. Geiger, "it is rather disconcerting to see Our Blessed Mother portrayed with 'attitude;' asserting herself in a rather anachronistic rebellion against an arranged marriage, choosing her words carefully with her parents, and posing meaningful silences toward those who do not understand her."

Fr. Geiger adds that the film also contains "an overly graphic scene of St. Elizabeth giving birth," which is "just not suitable, in my opinion, for young children to view."

Despite its flaws Fr. Geiger, after viewing the film, also has some good things to say about it. "Today, one must commend any sincere attempt to put Christ back into Christmas, and this film is certainly one of them," he says. "The Nativity Story in no way compares to the masterpiece which is The Passion of the Christ, but it is at least sincere, untainted by cynicism, and a worthy effort by Hollywood to end the prejudice against Christianity in the public square."

And, in addition to a good portrait of St. Joseph, the film offers "at least one cinematic and spiritual triumph" in portraying the Visitation of Mary to St. Elizabeth. "Although the Magnificat is relegated to a kind of epilogue at the movie's end, the meeting between Mary and Elizabeth is otherwise faithful to the scriptures and quite poignant. In a separate scene, the two women experience the concurrent movement of their children in utero and share deeply in each other's joy. I can't think of another piece of celluloid that illustrates the dignity of the unborn child better than this."

See Fr. Geiger's full review here:
http://airmaria.com/


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Religion & Culture; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic; catholics; christmas; mary; movie; nativity; nativitystory; thenativitystory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 4,721-4,7404,741-4,7604,761-4,780 ... 16,241-16,256 next last
To: HarleyD

Is there a difference between saying that a particular book gives you salvation and worshiping that book?

Seems a far cry from worshipping Christ.


4,741 posted on 01/09/2007 4:47:11 PM PST by kawaii (Orthodox Christianity -- Proclaiming the Truth Since 33 A.D.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4718 | View Replies]

To: kosta50; HarleyD; Dr. Eckleburg; Blogger; Forest Keeper
The master deciver made sure there were plent of alternative "Gospels" to go around, and ever since then has been popping up heresies and protests, reforms, what not, even among the brothers.

I would be more concerned about your brothers who run around praying to apparitions of a dead human than those who bury their nose in Scripture and discuss proper understanding.

4,742 posted on 01/09/2007 4:50:29 PM PST by wmfights (LUKE 9:49-50 , MARK 9:38-41)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4712 | View Replies]

To: annalex

Does this commentary bother you?
http://www.rosaryarmy.com/consecrationpodcast3.aspx


The third devotion to our Lady, known and practiced by very few persons, is this I am about to disclose to you, predestinate soul. It consists of giving one's self entirely and as a slave to Mary, and to Jesus through Mary, and after that, to do all that we do, through Mary, with Mary, in Mary and for Mary. We should choose a special feast day on which we give, consecrate and sacrifice to Mary, voluntarily, lovingly and without constraint, entirely and without reserve: our body and soul, our exterior property, such as house, family and income, and also our interior and spiritual possessions:

Namely, our merits, graces, virtues and satisfactions.


4,743 posted on 01/09/2007 4:51:18 PM PST by Blogger (In nullo gloriandum quando nostrum nihil sit- Cyprian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4733 | View Replies]

To: kawaii

Sorry. Not buying that one. She is your alleged advocate,

http://vatican.mondosearch.com/search_en.aspx?query=pray+to+mary&x=0&y=0

http://www.marypages.com/PrayerstoMary.htm

Mary, Help of Those in Need

Holy Mary,
help those in need,
give strength to the weak,
comfort the sorrowful,
pray for God's people,
assist the clergy,
intercede for religious.
Mary all who seek your help
experience your unfailing protection.
Amen.

Prayer to Our Lady of Czestochowa

O Mother of God, Immaculate Mary, to Thee do I dedicate my body and soul, all my prayers and deeds, my joys and sufferings, all that I am an all that I have. With a joyful heart I surrender myself to Thy love. To Thee will I devote my services of my own free will for the salvation of mankind, and for the help of the Holy Church whose Mother Thou art.
From now on my only desire is to do all things with Thee, through Thee, and for Thee. I know I can accomplish nothing by my own strength, whereas You can do everything that is the will of Thy Son, Our Lord Jesus Christ. You are always victorious. Grant, therefore, O Helper of the Faithful, that my family, my parish, and my country might become in truth the Kingdom where Thou reignest in the glorious presence God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit, forever and ever.
Amen.

Prayer to Our Lady of Fatima

O Most Holy Virgin Mary, Queen of the most holy Rosary, you were pleased to appear to the children of Fatima and reveal a glorious message. We implore you, inspire in our hearts a fervent love for the recitation of the Rosary. By meditating on the mysteries of the redemption that are recalled therein may we obtain the graces and virtues that we ask, through the merits of Jesus Christ, our Lord and Redeemer.
Amen

Prayer to Our Lady of Guadalupe

Dear Mother, we love you. We thank you for your promise to help us in our need. We trust in your love that dries our tears and comforts us. Teach us to find our peace in your Son, Jesus, and bless us every day of our lives.
Help us to build a shrine in our hearts. Make it as beautiful as the one built for you on the Mount of Tepeyac. A shrine full of trust, hope, and love of Jesus growing stronger each day.
Mary, you have chosen to remain with us by giving us your most wonderful and holy self-image on Juan Diego's cloak. May we feel your loving presence as we look upon your face. Like Juan, give us the courage to bring your message of hope to everyone.
You are our Mother and our inspiration. Hear our prayers and answer us.
Amen.

And many more...


4,744 posted on 01/09/2007 4:57:19 PM PST by Blogger (In nullo gloriandum quando nostrum nihil sit- Cyprian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4736 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

The word "sacrifice" is indeed inapproproate, at least without a qualifier. "Dedicate" would be better. But no, it doesn't really bother me since it is all clearly Christ-centric.

I don't see you quote at the link though.


4,745 posted on 01/09/2007 4:57:29 PM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4743 | View Replies]

To: Blogger
declare He is worthy. We adore Him. We show him our love. We exalt Him.

With the possible exception of exalt, could you not say/give the same things of/to another person? What is the difference in your view?

4,746 posted on 01/09/2007 4:57:33 PM PST by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4725 | View Replies]

To: annalex

It is on one of the days that you have to drop down.


4,747 posted on 01/09/2007 5:00:05 PM PST by Blogger (In nullo gloriandum quando nostrum nihil sit- Cyprian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4745 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

No human is worthy. None is worthy of our exaltation. We do love humans, and do adore however, not in the same way. A human being is not our life. Christ Jesus is our life. I've seen Marian prayers saying Mary is "our life." To me, that is blasphemy.


4,748 posted on 01/09/2007 5:01:36 PM PST by Blogger (In nullo gloriandum quando nostrum nihil sit- Cyprian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4746 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

I am Orthodox! Why the heck are you linking to the website of the Patriarchate of Rome to justify your allegations?!?


4,749 posted on 01/09/2007 5:05:34 PM PST by kawaii (Orthodox Christianity -- Proclaiming the Truth Since 33 A.D.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4744 | View Replies]

To: kawaii

Didn't see the tagline


4,750 posted on 01/09/2007 5:06:34 PM PST by Blogger (In nullo gloriandum quando nostrum nihil sit- Cyprian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4749 | View Replies]

To: Blogger
Vita, dulcedo, et spes nostra

Yep, Blasphemy - or Love. Fortunately, when I first heard it sung I really could "feel the love." There was never any question in my mind that these monks love her and do NOT worship her.

4,751 posted on 01/09/2007 5:11:58 PM PST by Mad Dawg (horate hoti ex ergon dikaioutai anthropos kai ouk ek pisteos monon; Jas 2:24)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4748 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

More to the point, what exactly is supposed to be the problem with these prayers, in your view? They all make clear that her mediation is to Christ.

I've got to run but I would really like to know if it is simply a form of spirituality that is foreign to you or where do you see a fundamental problem. Anticipating one answer, Christ remains the mediator to the Father in all these prayers; Mary intercedes to Him. We are fully aware of the "one mediator" verse and do not see it violated here.


4,752 posted on 01/09/2007 5:12:45 PM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4750 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
All we can do is speak the truth in love.

So reason need not apply? Shades of Regensberg!

4,753 posted on 01/09/2007 5:16:19 PM PST by Mad Dawg (horate hoti ex ergon dikaioutai anthropos kai ouk ek pisteos monon; Jas 2:24)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4726 | View Replies]

To: annalex

It is not Scriptural. Jesus ALONE is the Mediator. NONE of the Apostles get even CLOSE to praying to Mary for her intercession or anything else. Giving Mary attributes of Christ is blasphemy but the Mary of Catholicism bears little resemblance to the Mary of Scripture (particularly in the apparitions). Consecrate the world to Mary? Not hardly. God alone is Sovereign.


4,754 posted on 01/09/2007 5:18:56 PM PST by Blogger (In nullo gloriandum quando nostrum nihil sit- Cyprian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4752 | View Replies]

To: Blogger; annalex
NONE of the Apostles get even CLOSE to praying to Mary for her intercession or anything else.

Re-read the story of the wedding at Cana.

4,755 posted on 01/09/2007 5:22:47 PM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4754 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr; Blogger
So a Protestant can see "worship" in quite a very large range.
Whereas, "worship" means something quite specific and different in Catholicism.

Yes. It's interesting, O Blogger, that you went to an English dictionary. That would be one of the las tplaces I'd go for a matter relating ultimately to a cocmmandment given in God's Language, namely Hebrew.

In my protestant seminary when we looked at the idea of worship we cranked through the etymmology some and it's relationship to worth. The line about a cemetary was mentioned: from memory) Many were buried there, some of honor and some of worship, where "honor" meant nobility and "worship" meant wealth.

Somebody said,"You worship what saves you," which is to say you "value" waht saves you, with respect to different kinds and degrees of salvation. I value exercise to save me from physical weakness and the blahs. But I value God supremely to save me from the whole mess.

So the "community usage" was "Supreme worship" or words of that kind.

But here we have veneration and worship, In English, as Webster's suggests, it's at most a matter of degree. Somehow I doubt the editors of Webster's care much about theology.

4,756 posted on 01/09/2007 5:25:10 PM PST by Mad Dawg (horate hoti ex ergon dikaioutai anthropos kai ouk ek pisteos monon; Jas 2:24)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4716 | View Replies]

To: Blogger
Consecrate the world to Mary? Not hardly. God alone is Sovereign.

You do get that we don't see those activities as mutually exclusive.

We're an old church, with habits and diction perhaps best understood with reference to Troubadours, Medieval poetry and customs, and things of that kind. You might get SOME notion of the affect (if you know Tolkien) when you consider Gimli's fierce devotion to Galadriel. That's "courtly love" of a kind. A knight could be devoted to his lady, but that had nothing to do with marital love (Except in Parzival -- his "lady" is his wife! Astonishing!) The "lady" might be the queen or his lord's wife, and at least in the ideal, the lover's joy would be only to receive her smile and the privilege of bearing a token of hers - a veil or a bit of sleeve which she had once worn. There really was an ideal of a passionate love which either had nothing to do with sex or with VERY sublimated sex, and it was a love that dared and endured great things, either of courage or of asceticism.

And that lies behind the language, excessive to our ears, of some of the Western songs to Our Lady.

And MY Lady would never return my love if I betrayed my utter allegiance to my Lord and hers. The matrix within which my love arises is that my Lord loves her, and she and I love Him.

Again, it's a matter of flavor and of experience. My mother was English, as she said "A British subject, not an American object." She had quite ambivalent feelings about the aristocracy, of which she was by no means a member, but she LOVED the Queen. I was bowled over when I realized this about her, and it shed a new light on pre-Republican governments and why regicide was considered especially foul.

Then I was involved with a really neat candidate for our state assembly, a self-made man and a man of principle and faith. And I remember seeing him march in our little community's 4th of July parade (in which George Allen usually rides a horse, since he's from around here.) And as he passed I smiled and whistled and pointed at him, as if to say, "You da MAN!" and he saw me and smiled and pointed back, as if to say, "No, YOU da Man!" And it just felt good. Now if I were to write a song about that, somebody could say it sounded blasphemous or plausibly homosexual. But it would be no more blasphemous than the Four Tops song, "I'll be there," which I always thought with a little tweaking would make a great hymn.

Lewis says, in another comparison, that some art is like through difference, and the more like, the more unlike. A good painted portrait is more like the subject than all but the very best photographs. But photographs are in some sense "exact" representations.

So the Theotokos is, as are we all, in God's image. But my devotion to her is very unlike my devotion to God.

One last inadequate appeal. I am very devoted to my wife. I am also very devoted to my child. Those devotions do not conflict with one another or with my devotion to God. If anything, they all reinforce one another.

Again, I am not really trying to persuade. Maybe I'm suggesting that there is a range and subtlety to religious affect and affiliation which might be more nuanced than folks at first appreciate.

4,757 posted on 01/09/2007 5:49:19 PM PST by Mad Dawg (horate hoti ex ergon dikaioutai anthropos kai ouk ek pisteos monon; Jas 2:24)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4754 | View Replies]

To: kosta50; kawaii

"Today 'Christians' work hard to steal other professed Christians into churches that condone abortion, gay marriage, hay lifestyles, and every manner of sin which Christ spoke against"

Actually I think it's reversed. Psuedo christians work hard to drive Christians out of churches that support "abortion, gay marriage, gay lifestyles, and every manner of sin which Christ spoke against". Every main line denomination is steadily losing members as they rush pell mell into hell. Seriously now, did you like that assonance or alliteration in that last phrase? I know it was not onamatapoea because I can't spell it.


4,758 posted on 01/09/2007 5:50:34 PM PST by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4714 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

Okay. Is it wrong to ask anyone to pray for one? How do we "parse" this one out?


4,759 posted on 01/09/2007 5:51:54 PM PST by Mad Dawg (horate hoti ex ergon dikaioutai anthropos kai ouk ek pisteos monon; Jas 2:24)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4754 | View Replies]

To: adiaireton8

LOL! Only took 9 posts for one to come out of the woodwork!


4,760 posted on 01/09/2007 5:53:47 PM PST by ducdriver ("Impartiality is a pompous name for indifference, which is an elegant name for ignorance." GKC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 4,721-4,7404,741-4,7604,761-4,780 ... 16,241-16,256 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson