Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

English And Welsh Are Races Apart
BBC ^ | 6-30-2002

Posted on 07/04/2002 5:27:12 PM PDT by blam

Sunday, 30 June, 2002, 15:31 GMT 16:31 UK

English and Welsh are races apart

Gene scientists claim to have found proof that the Welsh are the "true" Britons.

The research supports the idea that Celtic Britain underwent a form of ethnic cleansing by Anglo-Saxons invaders following the Roman withdrawal in the fifth century.

Genetic tests show clear differences between the Welsh and English

It suggests that between 50% and 100% of the indigenous population of what was to become England was wiped out, with Offa's Dyke acting as a "genetic barrier" protecting those on the Welsh side.

And the upheaval can be traced to this day through genetic differences between the English and the Welsh.

Academics at University College in London comparing a sample of men from the UK with those from an area of the Netherlands where the Anglo-Saxons are thought to have originated found the English subjects had genes that were almost identical.

But there were clear differences between the genetic make-up of Welsh people studied.

The research team studied the Y-chromosome, which is passed almost unchanged from father to son, and looked for certain genetic markers.

Ethnic links: Many races share common bonds

They chose seven market towns mentioned in the Domesday Book of 1086 and studied 313 male volunteers whose paternal grandfather had also lived in the area.

They then compared this with samples from Norway and with Friesland, now a northern province of the Netherlands.

The English and Frisians studied had almost identical genetic make-up but the English and Welsh were very different.

The researchers concluded the most likely explanation for this was a large-scale Anglo-Saxon invasion, which devastated the Celtic population of England, but did not reach Wales.

Dr Mark Thomas, of the Centre for Genetic Anthropology at UCL, said their findings suggested that a migration occurred within the last 2,500 years.

Genetic links

It reinforced the idea that the Welsh were the true indigenous Britons.

In April last year, research for a BBC programme on the Vikings revealed strong genetic links between the Welsh and Irish Celts and the Basques of northern Spain and south France.

It suggested a possible link between the Celts and Basques, dating back tens of thousands of years.

The UCL research into the more recent Anglo-Saxon period suggested a migration on a huge scale.

"It appears England is made up of an ethnic cleansing event from people coming across from the continent after the Romans left," he said.

Celtic Britons

Archaeologists after the Second World War rejected the traditionally held view that an Anglo-Saxon invasion pushed the indigenous Celtic Britons to the fringes of Britain.

Instead, they said the arrival of Anglo-Saxon culture could have come from trade or a small ruling elite.

But the latest research by the UCL team, "using genetics as a history book", appears to support the original view of a large-scale invasion of England.

It suggests that the Welsh border was more of a genetic barrier to the Anglo-Saxon Y chromosome gene flow than the North Sea.

Dr Thomas added: "Our findings completely overturn the modern view of the origins of the English."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: ancientautopsies; ancientnavigation; apart; archaeology; basques; bookofinvasions; caledonia; celts; cymraeg; cymru; cymry; domesdaybook; england; english; evolution; fartyshadesofgreen; genealogy; genetics; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; greatormecoppermine; helixmakemineadouble; history; iberia; ireland; kingarthur; normanconquest; pictish; picts; race; races; sociobiology; spain; uk; unitedkingdom; wales; welsh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 421-432 next last
To: PoisedWoman
Fiddlstx, let's launch a claim to get out castle back! From there, we can take back London. Tomorrow, the world!

Let's Do It!
LOL

201 posted on 07/05/2002 8:16:30 AM PDT by Fiddlstix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: dr_who
Besides, everyone knows that the lost tribes of Israel all crossed into North America via the old land bridge and settled in Fargo, North Dakota.

This statue was found by archaeologist while digging through the ruins of the Olmecs ( the big Negroid looking heads) in Vera Cruz, Mexico. Do you care to speculate what people are represented by this statue in North America in prehistoric times? (Phoenicians?)


202 posted on 07/05/2002 8:31:22 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: dr_who
Was America A Phoenician Colony?
203 posted on 07/05/2002 8:36:59 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

All,

This has been one of the most fascinating posts I have EVER read on FR! Thank you everybody! I have been sitting here mesmerized for more than two of hours reading all the threads. It has been a tremendous education and treat! Thank you again.

204 posted on 07/05/2002 9:08:33 AM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
BLAM comes up with all kinds of good topics.
205 posted on 07/05/2002 9:28:49 AM PDT by LostTribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: All
Seven Nations, Celtic Rock.
206 posted on 07/05/2002 9:32:20 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LostTribe; blam
Thank you LostTribe and blam.
207 posted on 07/05/2002 9:59:54 AM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer); Ernest_at_the_Beach; LostTribe
"Thank you LostTribe and blam."

You're welcome. LT is the brains, I just stir the pot. There is a lot more at Gods, Graves, Glyphs that was set up by Ernest_at_the_Beach, but I can't tell you how to get there. lol. (Ernest will be along shortly and provide a link)

208 posted on 07/05/2002 10:13:10 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Torie
No, I'm not related to Fidel in any way, shape, or form...but this guy is.
209 posted on 07/05/2002 12:42:48 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: blam
I knew that Wagner uses "welsch" (the cognate in German to our "Welsh") in Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg to refer to what is French, so I looked "welsch" up in a German etymological dictionary. Seems the original Germanic noun referred to Celts, and in particular to the Gallic tribe called "Volcae" in Latin. Because of the Roman occupation of the Gallic areas in France, Northern Italy, etc., some Germanic peoples applied the term to Romance peoples like the French and Italians. The Anglo-Saxons invading Britain applied the term to the Welsh, who were both Celtic and semi-Romanized.
210 posted on 07/05/2002 1:20:21 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I don't think there's anything particularly Celtic in bagpipes originally. It's just that the playing of them has survived in peripheral regions of Europe, in many of which Celtic languages also happen to have survived. I believe originally bagpipes were played throughout Europe. Augustin of "Ach du lieber Augustin" was a Dudelsackpfeifer, i.e., bagpipe player, at the time of the Turkish siege of Vienna, i.e., long after Germans displaced Celts in Vienna.
211 posted on 07/05/2002 1:28:56 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: LostTribe
These ISRAELITE CELTIC GENTILES made up the bulk of the early Christians, and all the promises they received as Israelites were, and are, still good today. Gods inheritance has no statue of limitations.

Is the Israel-Celt connection the reason that Irish Gaelic and Hebrew sound so similar? I was shocked the first time I heard someone speaking Gaelic on an audio tape my daughter had. I thought the language learning company had packed a Hebrew tape in the box by mistake.

212 posted on 07/05/2002 1:33:35 PM PDT by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
I am an Irish-American who studied Biblical Hebrew for a couple of years and who made a valiant but unsuccessful effort to learn Gaelic. I assure you, the languages are unrelated except to the extent all Semitic and Indo-European languages might be related. Both families have gender, number, case, and person. Adjectives agree with their nouns, and verbs agree with their subjects in some of these categories. Semitic roots are pretty obviously composed of three consonants, with vowels inserted at various positions to make the forms derived from those roots. Turns out that the earliest version of Indo-European that can be reconstructed, once Hittite is taken into account, also has triconsonantal roots. So it's possible that Semitic and Indo-European may ultimately be related, but beyond that Hebrew and Gaelic are unrelated.
213 posted on 07/05/2002 1:46:02 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Torie
The Galician (Gallego) dialect is almost identical to Portuguese. When I visited Santiago de Compostela, I was able, having just spent a year studying Portuguese, to make myself understood to the locals.
214 posted on 07/05/2002 1:51:32 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: CaptRon
In the book The Story of English they make the point that the Welsh and the people of Normandy can make themselves understood with either of them speaking the others' language.

I think the point must have been made about the people of Brittany, not Normandy. Norman dialect now is just a form of French. Originally, in the Middle Ages, Normandy was settled by Norsemen, but they quickly adopted French as their language. By the time they conquered England in 1066, I don't think there were any traces left of their original Scandinavian language.

215 posted on 07/05/2002 1:54:17 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: LostTribe
I don't agree that Germans are just another variety of Celts. Germanic languages are not particularly close to Celtic languages. Celtic languages seem to related considerably more closely to Italic languages like Latin. Surely you wouldn't say that the speakers of Italic languages were just another variety of Celts?
216 posted on 07/05/2002 2:02:17 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
What evidence do you have of the Norman conquerors of England speaking any language besides Norman French? I am totally unaware of any evidence of their speaking some Celtic dialect.
217 posted on 07/05/2002 2:05:41 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Skalven
I guess the Celtic parties that are least socialist are the governing parties in Ireland. So maybe the thing to do is to give these countries independence, so that they actually have to make a go of things, and not rely on subventions from England.
218 posted on 07/05/2002 2:14:19 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
>I don't agree that Germans are just another variety of Celts. Germanic languages are not particularly close to Celtic languages.

Sorry, but as long as you insist on going exculsively down the language road and ignoring all the other facts of history and Bible you are going to be frustrated. Language is simply a VERY POOR INDICATOR of roots, especially over the long time periods we are examining. Ask any real linguist/archeologist.

219 posted on 07/05/2002 2:52:37 PM PDT by LostTribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
> Normandy was settled by Norsemen, but they quickly adopted French as their language. By the time they conquered England in 1066, I don't think there were any traces left of their original Scandinavian language.

It is astounding that you can be so cock sure the Norsemen totally lost their lingustic heritage IN ONLY THREE GENERATIONS or less, but everyone else you promote doesn't lose theirs in THOUSANDS OF YEARS! Don't you consider this ironic?

220 posted on 07/05/2002 2:57:59 PM PDT by LostTribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 421-432 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson