Posted on 02/03/2023 8:46:10 AM PST by AT7Saluki
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., recently commented on the viral clip of her speaking with Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., during the extended vote to install Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., as Speaker of the House.
The congresswoman admitted to CNN anchor John Berman that the conversation between her and Gosar revealed their "alignment" on not wanting McCarthy to have the leadership role, though she declared she finds it "uncomfortable" serving with Gosar, and other MAGA-identifying members of Congress because they engage in "stochastic terrorism" against her.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
"the public demonization of a person or group resulting in the incitement of a violent act, which is statistically probable but whose specifics cannot be predicted: The lone-wolf attack was apparently influenced by the rhetoric of stochastic terrorism."
💩
Since her entire Party want to burn America down her comment is the truth.
She is obviously running for President.
Why was Gosar talking to a Marxist traitor!?
Check out the big brain on Sandy.
Yeah I noticed that.
I noticed she misused the word. I wouldn’t think that ‘terrorism’ was completely unplanned and random.
Didn’t see your post before i posted.
We made the same point. ;-)
I’m sure Paul is just saying “good... I don’t want you near me anyhow”.
If ‘Sandy’ is ‘uncomfortable serving with terrorists’, she needs to resign from the leftist party she serves with!
Source? REALITY!
Projection! Project, deflect, blame Trump and Maga.
I’m ‘uncomfortable’ serving with terrorists
She’s leaving the democrat party?.
So resign your seat.
Problem solved.
L
aoc talks about bipartisanship
way to reach across the aisle
maybe aoc got this phrase from a liberal random (oops stochastic) phrase generator
Maybe she can get her friends to resign then.
Am I the only one who’s glad she is uncomfortable?
In fact, ramp up her uncomfortableness to 11!
I hope she is surrounded by kids going to church, men and women getting married, women having babies, people praying to God, people going to work, housewives, hardworking Dads, friendly businessmen, oil drillers working, people making money, you know, all the stuff she’s against.
If every violent attack or crime is caused by “apparent influence by the rhetoric of stochastic terrorism” then surely no one is guilty of their own murderous or anti-social acts, right?
Except Republicans and their rhetoric that forced others to act violently, of course, but not the wielder of the knife, bat, club, gun, fist, etc.
Then leave…
You should'a taken that bartending course at CC.
I think this dumbass meant ‘stoichiometric’? Even if so, it lacks proper context. I’m familiar with stochiometric ratio of fuel and air in an internal combustion engine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.