Posted on 01/02/2023 3:13:10 AM PST by Jyotishi
OPINION
The US and Europe must be getting ready for Putin-like ambitious and aggressive statesmen in the days to come who would challenge the already ailing and aging western liberal order
The war in Ukraine is devastating and tragic. It has been ten months now. It demonstrates the strained relationship between Ukraine and Russia not only in the present, but also in the past. Russia’s claim over neighbouring Ukraine is a historic question. Nevertheless, the recent claims spearheaded by Moscow’s armed intervention on February 26 last year clearly exposed the rifts between the two nations and Putin’s agenda. We all need to grapple with the reality that Ukraine was an integral part of the former USSR till its breakdown in the year 1991.
Experts opine that the spy guy Putin has been looking for an opportunity to go to war with Ukraine to rebuild the former Russian Empire. In an age of globalisation propelled by the digital revolution, we all talk, celebrate, and claim our rights and liberties in a way that we never used to be. When big tech and other business conglomerates are encroaching upon the very sovereign rights of the contemporary nation-state, the latter is trying to guard the same jealousy. At this juncture, ever ambitious autocrats like Putin are hoping and struggling to chase sovereign rights of a neighbour. Alas! The whole world is watching it helplessly by simply offering arms and ammunition to the embattled regime of Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
When we flip the pages of recent political conflicts in Europe, we observe that Russia’s frontal war with Ukraine began in the year 2014. In that very year, in February-March, the Russian Federation under the leadership of Putin occupied Crimea, a southern peninsular area from Ukraine. For Putin, he all has the right to protect the rights of its compatriots in Crimea. Since then it has been more than eight years now Russia is at loggerheads with Ukraine, although there has not been any direct confrontation with that country unlike the one that started last year.
How is Putin managing global support for his aggressive war against Ukraine? Clearly, Putin is receiving both direct and indirect support from two big powers for this massive war — India and China — albeit in different ways. Indeed, both these nations are not exerting sufficient pressure on Putin to stop the war. Delhi is either abstaining or refusing to vote on the sanction imposed on Russia at the UN.
However, unlike fence-sitting China, India has been maintaining a clear stance that “it is not the right time for war” as the whole world is just coming out of a deadly Covid-19 pandemic. Delhi is sending clear signals in public and directly to Putin that it’s ready to mediate to end the conflict and urging Putin to end the war. So, India is on the side of peace; but this is not enough for a regional power like India.
On the other hand, China under Xi Jinping is happy to see Russia engaged in a war that is firmly challenging the western hegemony in Europe. In that case, Beijing and Moscow are on the same page; but the world should not forget the fact that both these nations are also competitors at various global forums. Neither Putin nor Xi would accept a subordinate role in the global stage. Therefore, Xi’s friendship or ties with Putin is just a marriage of convenience at this moment. Frankly, Putin is fighting a war with NATO or with the top western powers which Xi is preparing to do for quite some time. Again, both the countries are interdependent in the sense that they are a part of a global coalition to craft a new global order to fight and replace the liberal global order that has been dominating the world since the end of the Second World War under the leadership of the US.
Today, Ukraine’s 43 million people are facing a dark future as the country is devastated under the Russian attacks. Neither they are hoping for an immediate end of the war, nor are they receiving any relief from their economic hardship. Banks are closed, transport systems are suspended in most parts of the country and markets are completely empty. The normal life is shattered. Every single day, war clouds are hovering over Kiev and Kharkiv, a strategically located city just 25 miles from the Russian border. Further, this war town is a midpoint between the already occupied regions of Luhansk and Donetsk in the east and the capital of Kyiv to the west.
Zelenskyy is made a hero out of this war. His resistance is spectacular. He garnered support both from the US and Europe to save his country with financial and military aids. He has been fervently struggling to safeguard the sanctity of his nation. So far, he has been able to make his point in all the global forms, including the UN. And therefore, Russia and Putin are equally worried that the West is mounting both sanctions and pressure on Moscow.
Putin is finding no way out. The Czar is equally helpless and reckless. But neither Putin nor Zelenskyy is ready to surrender. However, Moscow has recently claimed that he is ready to negotiate with Kiev. But it is surprising that despite sending signals for negotiation, Putin has mounted devastating attacks on Kiev and other strategic locations in Ukraine. The end result is the suffering of the common people, particularly women, children, elders and the sick. Above all, Putin must put this war to an end at least on humanitarian ground.
Russia and Ukraine are two countries that have been intertwined for almost 1000 years. Their separation and subsequent developments in Europe and around the world have entirely changed the geopolitical situation in the region. And clearly, Putin was threatened by the NATO encirclement in and around Russia. His concerns were not addressed by the West and forced him to go to war. It is a fact. But that can’t be a justification for Russia to attack an independent nation.
Slavik kinship, extensive intermarriage and long cultural bonding have made Russia and Ukraine not only common European brethren, but also their historical longing for future reunions in border areas. But can it be done by an aggressive war as launched by Putin. No way. Though they are historically and culturally connected, a forceful political reunion could cost both the Russians and the Ukrainians dear. Hope this New Year 2023 will bring sense to Putin to put an end to this bloody war. At the same time, the West under the leadership of the US must understand the growing pain of a new Russia that wants to set the course of global political leadership under Putin. This war is an indication of that. The US and Europe must be getting ready for Putin-like ambitious and aggressive statesmen in the days to come who would challenge the already ailing and aging western liberal order.
(The writer is the Head of the Department of Arts and Humanities at Geeta University, Panipat)
Crimea was a semi-autonomous region in Ukraine before the invasion, and now its a police state, so not sure what rights Putin has protected in Crimea.
Its ridiculous to say Putin was "forced" to go to war, neither Ukraine nor NATO was going to invade nuclear armed Russia.
Ukraine was almost always historically controlled by someone else.
During the 20th century, Ukraine was aligned with the USSR and the Russian people.
After the collapse of the USSR, Ukraine floundered as an independent nation being pulled by east and west at the same time. Its corruption levels did not help its independence.
In 2014, after Russia annexed Crimea, the west staged a coup and had the Russia-aligned leader impeached, replaced with a western-aligned leader.
This did not sit well with the large portion of the Ukrainian population that was aligned with Russia.
After that, Ukraine was torn apart into pro-western and pro-Russian factions that fought each other. The new, pro-western government got involved and so did Russia.
There were no efforts to resolve the situation peacefully by the west that also used threats of NATO membership, etc. to escalate the tensions.
Russia is not the good guy. The west is not the good guy.
I join you in your sentiment, and refuse the "offer" to pick one of two possible "sides." Not every conflict and not every argument is dualistic in nature. Certainly this particular conflict will end with a loss, as our Afghan adventure was indeed a loss, spun as necessary and such. What will be the outcome of this Ukraine/Russia slugfest? The "sides" say their view, but I have no idea. Time will tell. The impact will be far larger than we expect, I should think, as the multipolar world seems forming with greater speed, and this predicts Biden's claim that "we must lead the liberal world order" is a boast, and not a likelihood.
Ukraine was free and independent for the last 30 years, and they have shown in their defense against Putin's invasion they don't want to be under Putin's boot.
“And clearly, Putin was threatened by the NATO encirclement in and around Russia. His concerns were not addressed by the West and forced him to go to war.”
Wow, this is going to ANGER the bunch who are trying to re-write history to now claim that all was fine on Feb 24 of last year, and then Putin just, arbitrarily, decided to invade Ukraine that day. Must have gotten up on the wrong side of the bed that morning, perhaps?
“His concerns were not addressed by the West and forced him to go to war. It is a fact. But that can’t be a justification for Russia to attack an independent nation.”
Heck, the West wouldn’t even return his calls in the months leading up to the military operation. What’s funny is that during the Cold War, the Hippies DEMANDED that we talk with the Soviets, as that was the only way to prevent war (and they were likely right).
Now the Hippies are running the West, and they completely REFUSED to talk to Putin. Makes it quite obvious that this is a war they wanted.
1. We all need to grapple with the reality that Ukraine was an integral part of the former USSR till its breakdown in the year 1991. --> so? India and Ireland were integral parts of the British empire until it's breakdown (1920-1947), that does not mean they should be part of it now.
2. the growing pain of a new Russia that wants to set the course of global political leadership under Putin. -- Putin could have focused, like Modi is, on growing the wealth of ordinary Russians. But he did the opposite and is using the war to distract them from his abysmal performance
that was March and look at how much you Russians have lost by January 2023
You are losing so I understand you panicking
Do you still want to hunt down Muslims and shoot them?
“Ukraine was almost always historically controlled by someone else.”
Neither was Estonia nor Latvia nor Ireland (until 1920) etc. — yet Ukraine has been independent since 1990, that is 30 years.
IN 2014 there wasn’t a coup - Yanokowych promised one thing and broke his promise to the electorate. there were peaceful sitdowns in Kyiv but he used force and finally he fled.
He was impeached and lost.
Poroshenko, who was then elected, was and is a native Russian speaker — as is Zelensky.
There isn’t “a large portion of the Ukrainian population aligned with Russia” - note that in the 1991 referendum to leave the USSR, 56% of Crimea, and about 76% to 80% of the Donbas regions voted to leave the USSR and leave a union with Russia. Since then the percentage has only increased in the non-Crimea places.
Also in late 2014 I met with a Ukrainian who was bringing aid to orphanages in the occupied Donbass territory. When the checkpoints were closed he decided to enter through Russia. He was killed in Russia a few days after I met with him in a “car accident.”
So yes, the war began in 2014.
Then in 2015, I heard former general Wesley Clark speak. Of course I can hardly stomach him, but what he said had turned out to be right. He called the conflict the next phases in East-West war where new war methods were being tested. He was very concerned it would escalate.
By extension, the purpose of the expanded Ukraine war could be further testing of weapons development and war strategy on a national level.
Russia doesn’t pose an immediate threat to me personally. The western oligopoly does.
No. WE are the baddies in this situation. The collective west under the corrupt deceptive US has created this situation. Too many lies. The whole edifice of American “righteousness” is dead since it has been replaced with a sick cabal of corrupt deep state agencies. They lie to us…they lie to the world. They are not to be trusted. Social media propaganda and manipulation has been used to distort truth and consolidate power. If they are defeated by the hands of Russia then so be it. The more resounding the defeat, the better.
good points..
Ukraine has been a “country” longer than russia/muskovy
Ukraine is NOT russian. It was settled by Jews, Greeks and Vikings way before russia was a country.
putin is an evil man, a killer. That must be understood, imo
He is a statesman and carefully explains his interests honestly. He did so good over a decade. Our perverted and depraved government bent on world domination utterly ignored him. To show the slightest respect would imply that they did not rule the world.
Lavrov is even more of a statesman. No western leader compares.
Ukrainian dictator replicates WWII-type war crimes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B84HPchJMi0&ab_channel=TFIGlobal
From the article:
“Above all, Putin must put this war to an end at least on humanitarian ground.”
________________
Some people are simply deaf, dumb and blind. Russia will never be allowed to simply end this war. Russia is being forced to retaliate against their opposition and when they do we’ll all know it happens here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.