Posted on 01/22/2012 8:28:39 PM PST by Obama Exposer
President Obama plans to head out on a 3 day trip arriving in Las Vegas Wednesday afternoon and staying overnight well into Thursday. That afternoon he will leave for Denver and then Detroit. The president plans to promote his State of the Union address. With this action, President Obama intends to ignore a legal judicial subpoena from the state of Georgia requesting him, by name, to appear in court January 26th 2012 at 9am in Judge Michael Malihi's courtroom. Barack Obama's attempt as a candidate to be on the state ballot in Georgia has been officially legally challenged by state citizens in a official administrative hearing before a judge who was appointed by Governor Zell Miller, a democrat at the time.
It is important to know that, once you are given a subpoena or summons, you are legally required to attend the proceeding indicated on the document and serve as a witness for the case in question. Failure to comply with the court’s order can lead to severe penalties, including a warrant being issued for your arrest. In some states, you may even be fined, lose your driver’s license, or spend time in jail if do not appear at the proceeding indicated in the subpoena. As of now it appears Barack Obama will ignore the subpoena, upheld by Judge Malihi in his denial of the Presidents 'Motion to Quash', and carry on with his trip to 'Sin City' and beyond. It's also apparent that Barack Obama doesn't intend to show up in court and ensure the American people that he is indeed a natural born Citizen to be president as required by Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the United States Constitution.
I’ve got a better idea. How about a friendly wager? Obama appears, or he does not. The only thing that is certain is that, the law will be on the winning side. LOL
“Do you think he can’t keep Obama off the ballot? Same as above. Please show why you believe, legally and constitutionally speaking, he cannot.”
This judge cannot keep Obama off the ballot. Under state law he reports his findings to the SoS and SoS decides what to do.
Darn it, you spoiled almost everything.
No, how about you stop runnin’ round the Maypole and answer my and several issues/questions you’ve ducked.
OK, but it remains that it is his legal ruling that leads to it.
“OK, but it remains that it is his legal ruling that leads to it.”
That is correct. He will make a ruling at some point and then it will be up to the SoS. I think one can appeal to the Supreme Ct of GA after that.
But anyway what intrigues me about this case is the numerous historical documents talking about NBC. How do you argue against that? The only thing that the Obama attorney can argue is that the historical documents are wrong or that is not what they meant but as far as evidence supporting his position, he has none. So if this was a just hearing, the citizens should win the ruling. But if the judge rules against NBC all 3 will fail after the Judge rules that forged documents are not germane to qualifications.
However, one could argue that if the selective service record is a fraud, then Obama can’t hold office....
Once the judge makes a ruling, the SOS would need a very compelling reason not to follow that judgment.
Yes. Well you and I would. We have seen worse rulings than that.
Take the total hypocritical ruling the law commission did in NH. Pretty scary when you get a bunch of adults in the room that will argue the sky is purple. That should be a good sign we lost the country.
Really, since judges as a whole seem to have a vampire/cross aversion to his whole issue simply over issues of skin tone and the potential violence that could ensue, god knows how they will rule when the rubber hits the road. Prior rulings/historical documents don’t seem to matter.
All we can do is push as hard/far as we can and hope that the people ultimately rule correctly via the ballot box for every elected official involved.
Wasn’t the NH hearing pretty much led by Orly?? I blame that on her for not being able to clearly articulate the message. This Hatfield in Georgia seems much, much better.
“All we can do is push as hard/far as we can and hope that the people ultimately rule correctly via the ballot box for every elected official involved.”
Well thats a nice thought but I think that really only a handful of people in the country really understand the legal and future consequences of all this. Dems have no problem with who votes in elections, why would they care who they are voting for. Look at the county that raised hell when they took the Rs and Ds off the ballot. They complained they didn’t know who to vote for.
Put yourself in their shoes. Obama v Romney and Rubio. Who are you going to vote for? Or will you vote at all? There is definitely no way to challenge the qualifications of a vice president. Heck we can’t even check the prez’s now.
What I am saying is this, if the few people who do know there is a problem don’t get laws passed in their state legislatures charging SoS to check qualifications and give standing to ordinary citizens, we will eventually someday be doomed.
FRiend, did you not watch Orly on tape? I thought her testimony in NH which was brilliant and flawless.
FR’s own GregNH gave testimony, too. She did come down a bit too hard while questioning the hapless, but innocent, clerk and got a bit frazzled, but that was minor. It was the 100% Democrat corrupt panel that was the problem who denied they had any power other than to see if all of the boxes had been filled in...even thought they had previously disqualified another foreign born candidate.
Come on edge, you are not being fair. She handed them 85 pages of evidence. Their out was the law only requires us to collect a check and a form. So what the heck we need 15 people to do that for?
Orly is it, like it or not. She is the only attorney in the country willing to file ballot challenges all over the country period.
See if you can find one, much less one who will do it pro bono. See if Hatfield, Van Irion, Donofrio, Apuzzo, Berg, Kreep etc etc will return your calls. And if you try to file one pro se, right in the garbage it will go.
She is our only hope and thats the reality of it. So go easy on her.
Don’t hold your breath!
He is no American citizen.
He is not even a good an evil, likely insane man.
He is behaving accordingly."
FIFY
You miss the point (surprize that) that Obama in the context of this case is not the sitting president, but a candidate.
This is a different situation.
He’s just a candidate.
Perhaps the smell was from the "poppers"
mindless Tattz frivolities?
Not only was the foreign born removed from the ballot that hapless clerk removed him all by herself! That is the problem. I have her email exchange with me, it was posted in many places over time but the last one was on the thread for the hearing. She simply removed him and listed his as “disqualified” because he was not a “natural born Citizen” yet I point that out at the hearing, all be it loudly, it was “he admitted he was born in Egypt”. So we need Obama to admit he is not an NBC......ummmm he did!
"Well, Presidents can be somewhat busy. Busier than you or I. It’s why you don’t have a Filipino waiting for you with a fresh cup of your favorite coffee every morning, and greeting you with, 'Good Morning, Mr. President.'"
Wow. Personal attacks and racism in one thread? Can someone please cogently explain to me how someone exhibiting this kind of boorish behavior has lasted this long on FR? Kittehs want to know.
Oh, and 1rb: Notwithstanding the more-far-fetched notion of flying a judge to the WH, which would appear more as a "summoning" of the judge with overtones of supplication, I concede that the Pres__ent (No ID: h/t musicman) is likely able to dispatch agents to represent him in his stead in Georgia, provided that any subpoenaed evidentiary materials are made available by same agents for inspection by the court, its agents and those the court considers germane actors in the proceedings as directed by court rules and attendant instructions by the judge.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.