Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Obama To Ignore Georgia Subpoena And Head To Las Vegas Jan 26th.

Posted on 01/22/2012 8:28:39 PM PST by Obama Exposer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-156 next last
To: 1rudeboy

No, how about addressing your claims you stated? For the 3rd time, address the question. Again, Name any judge that a president has flown to the White House to take a deposition from him and for what occassion?


81 posted on 01/22/2012 10:35:16 PM PST by Obama Exposer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

Not completely apples and oranges. You can have a grandstanding judge indicting a sitting President for warcrimes in order to create a spectacle, or you can have a grandstanding judge insisting that a sitting President appear before him about what is a purely administrative matter. In order to create a spectacle.


82 posted on 01/22/2012 10:35:16 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Oh, yah . . . you got me at Obama supporter. What a genius.


83 posted on 01/22/2012 10:36:57 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

The SF crew had no legal authority to do squat over war crimes...this judge does over election issues.

The only grandstanding outside SF is your own.


84 posted on 01/22/2012 10:38:37 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
85 posted on 01/22/2012 10:38:37 PM PST by LucyT ( NB. ~ Pakistan was NOT on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981. ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Well, don’t support Obama and you won’t have that problem.


86 posted on 01/22/2012 10:39:46 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

!


87 posted on 01/22/2012 10:43:47 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (I can take tomorrow, $pend it all today. Who can take your income, tax it all away. Obama Man can. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Goldwater Girl

Thank you, ma’am.


88 posted on 01/22/2012 10:44:08 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

!


89 posted on 01/22/2012 10:44:11 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (I can take tomorrow, $pend it all today. Who can take your income, tax it all away. Obama Man can. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

!


90 posted on 01/22/2012 10:44:28 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (I can take tomorrow, $pend it all today. Who can take your income, tax it all away. Obama Man can. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

That just shows you have no idea what you are talking about.

This hearing isn’t about removing him from office.

Read up and then you might be taken seriously.


91 posted on 01/22/2012 10:45:29 PM PST by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Or his inferiors can plead the fifth.If his inferiors plead the fifth what will Obama plead?Stupid?Wonder how long Holder will cover for Obama as he appears again in 2 weeks.

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/205401-fed-officer-invokes-fifth-in-fast-and-furious-probe

Obama has so many crimes so little time in between his hideous speeches. He will slip up and it may be his name not being on any ballots.Now that is justice.

92 posted on 01/22/2012 10:45:54 PM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer
Looks like Obama is going to put it all on Black and let it ride. Let the Campaign begin, oops, I mean continue.
93 posted on 01/22/2012 10:46:14 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (Liberals, Useful Idiots Voting for Useless Idiots...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Again, I am taking an objective view. People who are emotionally-vested in their argument won’t see it. A sitting President isn’t subject to the whim of whatever State judge happens to come along. It’s why Presidents have a legal team. Anybody remember Bush v. Gore?


94 posted on 01/22/2012 10:48:26 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

This says it all in the title

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/s_777667.html


95 posted on 01/22/2012 10:50:13 PM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

Is anybody taking seriously the best darn Amended Motion to Quash you had ever seen being filed and ruled on tomorrow?

Come on the Judge practically ordered one be written. Anyway, it doesn’t matter. Orly’s witnesses are coming anyway. Obama’s attorney will argue against NBC and as far as the forgery claims, I don’t know what the judge does about that. It will depend on what argument the Obama attorney makes.

Then it will be the SoS job to decide what to do.


96 posted on 01/22/2012 10:50:30 PM PST by jdirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer; LucyT; Red Steel
LucyT and RS - did you see Obama Exposer's comment:

From what I am hearing now is that Obama is trying to set it up for some kind of mis-trial type appeal where he can claim he got incompetent representation by Jablonski for the ballot hearing? He could then attempt to get another judge of their liking to hold the hearing in front of?

97 posted on 01/22/2012 10:50:40 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
Read up and then you might be taken seriously.

Alternatively, you could read the comment to which I was responding.

98 posted on 01/22/2012 10:50:55 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

It’s not ‘emotional’ anything. Do you think this judge lacks the authority to compel his appearance? If so, please show us the legal reasons and the constitutional reasons a sitting judge with the legal authority to preside over this case cannot use his legal authority. Do you think he can’t keep Obama off the ballot? Same as above. Please show why you believe, legally and constitutionally speaking, he cannot.

Otherwise, you are blowing smoke, trolling, and generally siding with Obama, not the law.


99 posted on 01/22/2012 10:54:58 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
In a perfect world (I can dream, can't I?), a State could insist that presidential candidates be certified to whatever standard that State wishes. I will note that, in this perfect world, a candidate would not personally have to appear before a judge because someone, somewhere, wants to score political points for someone, or something.
100 posted on 01/22/2012 10:55:57 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-156 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson