Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)
I'm really concerned if that really says what he meant.
The 1964 Certificate is only a Certificate of certain facts in the original record. It isn't a complete copy of the record; it isn't event a certification of all the facts.
Further, certificates in 1961 would be different from certificates in 1964 by definition. In 1961, the issuing agency was a division of Coast Province of Zanzibar; in 1964, the certificate was issued by the Republic of Kenya. See for explanation BP2's excellent work above.
The quality of Joe's legal help is not very high. He really needs someone who is paying attention to these kinds of details.
That is true. It was very "avante garde" for the mother to get the baby at all. The nurses brought him/her to you for feeding and then took him away. You weren't allowed to change him, dress, etc. until it was time to go home. I was in the hospital 5 days for my first. For my second I was there for 1 1/2 days -- released by accident. The doctor was furious. I stayed about 3 days for #3 and #4.For numbers 2 through 4 I had was was called "rooming in" where I had my own mini nursery that I shared with a roommate. The babies stayed in a drawer in the wall. When I was tired I could push the drawer into the wall and the baby came out the other side in the "mini nursery". The nurses could see through the glass that the baby was no longer with me and could keep an eye on the baby. That was at Kaiser Permanente Hospital in Walnut Creek, CA and was a VERY NEW regimen.
My first was born in IL in 1960 and it was a very regimented system. The nurses had full care of the babies. I was warned that the babies were coming by an announcement over the hospital loudspeaker. "Mothers, be prepared to receive your babies!" Made me jump out of my skin.
I wasn't allowed to touch that baby except for feeding time, so I was totally unprepared when I went home. I remember standing by the bathinette and trying to read directions on how to bather the baby -- what goes first, oil or powder? Got the book all wet.
Do you have a ping list? Please add me. Thanks.
Exactly and it doesn’t appear until days later. I smell a rat.
Then I think she needs a new hosting company, or something. That’s not good.
Should he not have “several samples of Kenyan birth certificates in use around” Feb, 1964 ???
Yes, apparently its a lot of things.
Must still be on the market.
Still looking, current law is much easier to dredge up than archaic law.
And that first bath is complicated by the fact that babies DON’T HOLD STILL.
Yes...
Thank you...
I feel like Irma in My Friend Irma...
"He's not going to deny her a divorce as she claims "grievous mental suffering." BUT how's Judge King going to award custody off of Ann's good word? I don't think so ... he'd turn to prima facie. I can hear his words now:"
I'm going to ask for the mother to provide a copy of the birth certificate at our next hearing in March (1964). So ordered.
I have to completely disagree with you on this one BP2. Yes the judge would take it off of Stanley Ann's (or her lawyer's word) on the divorce papers that Barack was her child.
I personally know of a marriage and divorce where the father was from a different country. There were 3 small children involved and the mother asked for custody but she didn't ask for child support. She knew with the father back in his country it would be impossible to collect. The Judge never questioned the mother in any of the statements she put on her "do it yourself" divorce papers. No Birth Certificates, No DNA nor her Marriage Certificate was ever asked to be put into the divorce records. He took her word for everything she put in those papers. She was awarded full custody.
In fact I know of many divorces with under age children and they never ask for copies of Birth Certificates to be filed with the divorce papers.
Yes and you are close. But you need to understand the procedure in order to understand the form.
The kid is delivered (in a hospital). The doc fills in a piece of paper and inks the foot and prints it; many jurisdictions including many US states, he does it twice.
Often the hospital administrator is required to sign attesting that the doc was really there and did it. He or she then sends the original to the government agency recorder; the counterpart is given to mother.
You need a certificate to deliver for some purpose? You go see the government agency. One kind of certificate is of the entire record on the piece of paper signed by the doc--from early periods (1940's), maybe even a photocopy--which has an embossed seal and a signature of the issuing clerk.
The other kind of certificate is only some official saying under oath whatever the certificate says--words to the affect that "I have examined the original record; x was born here on such and such date; delivered at so and so hospital by Doc. Bump."
Slippery, as well.
Definitely, the bottom line here. As there's zero (pun intended) public proof of place of birth.
Or it’s just another false trail to throw off the hounds.
Posted ad infinitum:
Show us the ~real~ BC and we’ll all shut up.
{{{{crickets}}}}
And the "punked" forgers have decided to put their "deception" out there NOW, barely 100 hours since Orly's came out ... to "release" us of our "collective psychosis" and "obsession" regarding Obama's NBC status ...
How thoughtful of them ... Yeah, I smell a rat, too. And it smells like DU and one of their forgeries.
;~)
The one with the “tear” was my crappy, hurried image editing.
[Mea culpa...mea culpa maxima]
Please disregard it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.