Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)
LOL
I just did what I usually do...
select the area by holding down the left side of the mouse and puling it over the page..
right click to get a menu...
Choose “copy” ...
and then paste in here...
At least i think I did that...
I’m just a Nana..
To get the link I just go up to the address and right click which causes it to be selected and then pick copy and then paste where ever...
If a lil ol helpless 60 YO grandmother can do it you young whipper snappers shouldnt have any problems...
:)
Well, I did that too, but it wouldn’t work for me. There was this pop up that kept interfering (I guess). When I’d go to paste, there was nothing there.
Oh, about the pop ups..
You must have gone over a word that caused that...
just go out of the page and come back in and be careful where you put your cursor...
Hard to know WHAT he’s trying to do with his tease. The fatherhood may be questionable but not his mother. The resemblance to his grandfather is very strong.
Thanks for the tip.
“Does anyone but me see the total
I N S A N I T Y
of this?”
Sure, it’s the Clintonoid years all over again. Don’t you remember? One of their techniques was to make you folks explain the basic facts over and over and over and over and over again. And then again. Until you were pulling your hair out and beginning to doubt if what you were saying was actually true.
Now in this case, they’re pretending to be confused over what the heck a “Natural Born Citizen” is. Who knows?!? So you must explain the basic premise over and over and over again, as is being done in this thread.
It’s probably the claim, made by some, that BHO is actually the product of an affair between Frank Marshall Davis and Madelyn Paine Dunham and that the baby was passed off as Stanley Ann Dunham/Barack Obama I’s baby.
I think this hypothesis is very doubtful, but someone has made it—LameCherry? He claims that Frank Marshall Davis hit on Stanley Armour Dunham’s wife. She would have been in her late 30s in 1960.
I hope this is not what Farah is hyping. But he’d done wilder things than this in the past.
The Dunhams only arrived in Hawaii in 1960 and they met Davis then. (Though Davis grew up not far from Stanley Dunham in Kansas, my understanding is that they did not meet until 1960 in Hawaii. This shoots down the claim that Stanley Ann Dunham is the 13-year-old sexually exploited in Davis’s pseudonymous porno-memoirs—when Ann Dunham was 13 she was in Kansas and Davis was in Hawaii).
See my 7247
Thanks :)
The Constitution means EXACTLY what it says
natural born = innate, having from birth
citizen = allegiance to a state in which the sovereign power is retained by the people
(Webster’s New Collegiate Dictonary, 1949)
He looks a lot like his Grandad Dunham- maybe he is his bastard son, not grandson
BO sr, bona fide black African Marxist, and Anna, selected to be the “parents” to cover his infidelty. Expains why no one ever saw Anna pregnant and why she disappeared from anyone’s recollection after her “marriage” in Feb 61
Obama in his book talks about how Grandpa Stan liked to take him along as a kid to cruise the red light district and talk sex and ogle women with “Frank”
Madelyn was a Bank VP - if she kicked ol’ Stan out for infidelity (interracial no less) or lost her job- there went the breadwinner
‘course, this theory throws the whole Kenya BC/citizenship thing down the toilet ...
I see that Spaulding 7231 beat me to it. Apologies.
I’ll make a few comments and that will be the last thing I will write on this subject.
First, I want to respond to BIGLOOK who shares my concern about having the physical document thoroughly examined.
BIGLOOK:
About that Photoshop elements claim: you cannot pull apart a JPG image into layers because it is a flattened image. The only thing that you can split off are the individual color channels (Red, Green, Blue). However, separating them into individual RGB channels will not reveal anything as the printed form and text are monochromatic.
El Gato:
I’ll answer you in the form of a question:
If you found a photo of a long-form Hawaiian birth certificate, produced on June 25, 1959, certified by the State of Hawaii with a raised Seal and Registrar’s signarture, hospital name, doctor’s name and signature, and so on, what analyses would you do to determine if its a forgery?
Answer: None.
Hawaii was not officially a state until August 21, 1959.
One little thing like a date can sink a document.
OK, folk, gotta run but I’ll be back sometime next week.
Hi Spaulding,
It does appear that Mr. Obama has backed himself into a corner; he can't afford to let anything slip that might bring down the entire house of cards, so he and his supporters fight (and lie) relentlessly to maintain the illusion of eligibility.
There was no other reason to hide the proof of his birth - in our modern society, nobody really cares who your parents are, if you were born out-of-wedlock, or even if your father and your grandfather are the same person (besides, with the MSM on his side, he would be revered for "overcoming his disadvantages")---but we do still care about being lied to, and the discovery that he lied about his country of birth (and actively covered-up the truth) would be the end of his political career. So, if Obama got where he is through that kind of fraud or deceit, a pardon from President Biden may be his only hope!
Contrary to some of the seeming treatments by some academics, the Founding Fathers were not some gigantic intellects creating mysteries for the Ages, as some of the professors would appear to imply with the complexities of their papers. They were often well educated men, fluent quite often in French and/or other languages in addition to English, and they necessarily were practical enough to usually evade the hangman's noose during the Revolutionary War and trade (smuggle) goods to keep body, soul, and country together. This quite often involved less than scrupulous care with respect to consistency in spelling, terminologies, and uniformity. They did nevertheless exercise an acute and often aggressive awareness of status, privileges, rights, duties, and sworn oaths which inconsistencies in terminologies were of naught influence. Consequently, it would be a grievous error to wrongly assume they did not have an immediate understanding of the natural born citizen, free born, free born citizen, and other terminology and pretty much exactly how it related to the allegiance and duties owed to the United States.
For the Founding Fathers of 1787, the meaning of natural born citizen was so obviously a matter of being born with an allegiance, it was entirely unnecessary to treat it as a new term of art requiring an explanation.
I have. Like everyone else here, my views on this have rapidly evolved as the collective applied intelligence of this community sorts it all out.
Vice President Burr was really not that bad. I was fortunate enough to be assigned to write a report on him, of which the background research included reading through the entire transcripts of his trial.
He was the first example of bipartisanship Democrat style - Jefferson was of a different party and they tied in the electoral college. After the vote in the House of Reps, Jefferson was declared the winner and President and Burr the Vice President. Burr played along. Jefferson's Louisiana Purchase was as wildly unconstitutional as anything Obama is doing. The plot to annex northern Mexico (which also involved Zebulon Pike, Pike's Peak was named on a reconaisance mission) was really not all that sinister. I think the fall out was due to the infamous Hamilton/Burr duel, which was legal at the time. The trial for treason mainly focused on northern Mexico which was almost certainly done under Jefferson's direction.
When a scapegoat was needed, the bipartisan Vice President Burr was served up as the main course. McCain, take heed.
I pray you are right.
“Solum acknowledges the Vattel definition, but sets up a straw dog by asserting that it is indeterminate because it depends up English Common law, with “subject” mucking things up.”
Yup, even though a subject can Not be King. Go figure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.